BlueNoseAdam
New Signing-
Posts
100 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Downloads
Everything posted by BlueNoseAdam
-
is this the same radio(alan the dumb bastarted i love ra septic)station.loovens just went in for a tackle,mcdonald tryed 2 pull his leg oot of the tackle,wait for it here cmes the joke in scotland,dive.laught.kyle should have got the worse punishment,there having a laught.thet me lol,lol,lol,lol.
-
thats what u get from scotland nowadays,its turning into a terriost fest.no 1 apart from the other mob r aloud 2 speak. there they r trying 2 get the blacks walk stoped in dumbarton.why is this happening?because (WE R LETTING IT HAPPEN)so lets stand together,dont let these scum think that this is there country,oriland is there country.
-
http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/scotsol/ho...py-mending.html Interesting stuff. oh no..novo out for the last 20mins..falkirk will gub us..a poor manager"thinking" about 2 up front v falkirk. enjoy your season guys,there is more to come. let walter pick the team,hes the 1 thats never let us down,so hes the 1 paid 2 do what hes suppose 2 do.
-
no wat
-
To many people obsessed wae hatin they tims oan . .
BlueNoseAdam replied to BLUEDIGNITY's topic in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
-
Lafferty / Loovens / McDonald Disciplinary Hearings
BlueNoseAdam replied to Chef's topic in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
But the break is that Adam wasn't hauled up for it. Loovens hasn't gotten away with it, he's received the going rate for the crime. And Adam got away with it entirely so in a way Celtic have been more harshly dealt with than we have because an off the ball incident in the OF game was dealt with while 2 by our player in 2 matches were ignored. I just feel we're looking for a reason to complain. this is a diffrent game and a diffrent argument,these 2 tackles r worse than kyles dive,so get this in 2 perspective.kyle did not try 2 hurt anybody,these 2 scum players did. Getting another player sent off is heavily frowned upon. It's despicable behaviour and I don't have any disagreement with the ban. My point is that I refuse to compare the cases as they are different crimes and as such the punishment isn't the same. see if this was vice versa,i would have had the same punishment,but the player that dived would not have got the hardest punishment.that would have been the consistent.this is the sfa were talking aboot. -
Lafferty / Loovens / McDonald Disciplinary Hearings
BlueNoseAdam replied to Chef's topic in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
But the break is that Adam wasn't hauled up for it. Loovens hasn't gotten away with it, he's received the going rate for the crime. And Adam got away with it entirely so in a way Celtic have been more harshly dealt with than we have because an off the ball incident in the OF game was dealt with while 2 by our player in 2 matches were ignored. I just feel we're looking for a reason to complain. this is a diffrent game and a diffrent argument,these 2 tackles r worse than kyles dive,so get this in 2 perspective.kyle did not try 2 hurt anybody,these 2 scum players did. -
thats unbeliveble papaguy51.i remmember these games,it was when theyd just re vamped the e/c.no 1 gave rangers a chance,but we nearly won it,we should have won it.GOOD MEMORYS.should be no1
-
thats unbeliveble papaguy51.i remmember these games,it was when theyd just re vamped the e/c.no 1 gave rangers a chance,but we nearly won it,we should have won it.GOOD MEMORYS.should be no1
-
Lafferty / Loovens / McDonald Disciplinary Hearings
BlueNoseAdam replied to Chef's topic in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
All well and good, and I agree that it's a dreadful tackle, but what of Charlie Adam who didn't even get hauled for disciplinary hearings when during 2 successive matches he clearly and deliberately stamped opponents on the deck last season? The point is sometimes this stuff goes for you, other times it doesn't. And far too many fans remain angry at the ones which don't and conveniently forget the ones which do. Danny, I agree on the Charlie Adam point, but it's almost irrelevant in this case. The fact that he's been hauled up in front of the beaks means that he's been caught - he shouldn't get away with it because Charlie Adam wasn't hauled up for it. If the SFA seriously think that...; ...isn't worthy of an explanation, then I must be on the wrong planet. If it's acceptable, I hope to see it employed more often against Celtic next year though cant belive that the board of committees have ruled that kyles dive is worse than loovens,mcdonalds tackles.this goes 2 show were the sfa loyaltys lay,septic fc -
Im expecting them to As for this thread, there is no big difference between pot 2 and 3 However there is a big difference between getting all the CL money, and splitting it. Come on the gooners well said mate.thats wat i was thinking.dont give these traitors any room send them back 2 were (they want 2 be from)ROI.
-
he was until he lost 5 goals aganist that mob
-
no way,i dont care who they play,i support glasgow rangers.so if they get put oot so be it,i never what them 2 win at anything.thats just the way iam.i detest this club for wat they stand for.
-
People talk so much pish TBH
-
***Official Madjid Bougherra Thread***
BlueNoseAdam replied to foot365's topic in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
Aw well seen this coming tbh sad to see him go -
lololol funny site
-
Always quite before the storm
-
yea he had no chance in getting no1
-
I dont think he will leave us and yes i would swap mendes for hutton
-
Dosent Look Like anymore Players will be signed now
BlueNoseAdam replied to Davie2909's topic in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
Yeo thank fuk we have a good squad i hink shud be a good season for us -
look rlly good m8 nice work Adam
-
Nah hes to much on the wage budget.
-
Sounds like a good signing.
-
Cousin and Darcheville for the off
BlueNoseAdam replied to ricksen_da_best's topic in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
I would like to see big JCD stay Adam