tbblue 167 Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Given the SFA statement surely we now must look into a joint legal route into tackling anything that sees us as consumers not gaining what we paid for in our ticket outlays.....promotion! We must have consumer/retail lawyers amongst our support that could advise? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brock 42 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 Rangers should be doing this themselves, dont think it should be up to the fans to fight and pay for this.Time for the club to make a stand, if need be the RFFF should step in but they really shouldnt have to. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 Rangers should be doing this themselves, dont think it should be up to the fans to fight and pay for this.Time for the club to make a stand, if need be the RFFF should step in but they really shouldn't have to.As being someone who has never been jealous of anything or anyone, I would say the distrust not hate of the rst is borne out of their history as achievements nil, disruption towards the club in their hour of need , proven by their scaremongering and self-interest Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionRedHMS 190 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 Given the SFA statement surely we now must look into a joint legal route into tackling anything that sees us as consumers not gaining what we paid for in our ticket outlays.....promotion! We must have consumer/retail lawyers amongst our support that could advise?UEFA and FIFA should be very concerned. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
allgers 735 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 As fans we have made the biggest show of support we can, and it ain't over, Peterhead game is going to be the biggest event in UK this Saterday, can we do more? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
daviecooper01 826 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 Given the SFA statement surely we now must look into a joint legal route into tackling anything that sees us as consumers not gaining what we paid for in our ticket outlays.....promotion! We must have consumer/retail lawyers amongst our support that could advise?You or we did not pay for promotion.We paid for admission to 18 home league games.That's it.The contract between Rangers & the customers (us) will have been fulfilled in full.Complete non-starter, I am afraid.The ONLY legal action would be for member clubs to sue to organisation if any changes are made to the setup which are spcifically prohibited or the timescale set out differently, in the rules.And this brings us back to SFL Section 85..... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
markybear 136 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 You or we did not pay for promotion.We paid for admission to 18 home league games.That's it.The contract between Rangers & the customers (us) will have been fulfilled in full.Complete non-starter, I am afraid.The ONLY legal action would be for member clubs to sue to organisation if any changes are made to the setup which are spcifically prohibited or the timescale set out differently, in the rules.And this brings us back to SFL Section 85.....In a league of 18, RFC will only get 17 home gamesIf RFC start to sell the tickets soon for an sfl2 season with 18 home games then surely the gov bodies couldn't force thru 12-12-18 as we've paid for the original setupHearts have already started selling ST's for next season so its not too early either Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
daviecooper01 826 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 In a league of 18, RFC will only get 17 home gamesIf RFC start to sell the tickets soon for an sfl2 season with 18 home games then surely the gov bodies couldn't force thru 12-12-18 as we've paid for the original setupHearts have already started selling ST's for next season so its not too early eitherIf an 18 team league was put in place after STs were being sold, then Rangers simple refund 1/18th of the total ticket price.Again, the contract ST holders enter into is with the club to provide admission to league games - that's it. In fact, it only specifies league games, not the number.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 55 9,311 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 What's the problem with them getting involved?IMO its crazy that there aren't still discussions regarding single body, better wealth redistribution, play-offs and a pyramid structure. This whole take it or leave it deal from the SPL is utter nonsense and if it takes the SFA to get involved to sort it out then so be it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.