Rennie 0 Posted May 11, 2008 Share Posted May 11, 2008 Celtic hav had many dodgey decisions in their favour thoughout the season but nothing has been said. So why now because Rangers have had ONE game with a couple of these decisions everyone is talking about it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueben_d 40 Posted May 11, 2008 Share Posted May 11, 2008 exactly, as walter mentioned we had two strong penalty claims against motherwell denied and no mention was made of it. Celtic have had their favour of many dodgy refereeing decisions, we get one and I stress one because the offside goal had to be offside as the ball crossed the line of vision of the keeper and the player in question and it's being reported that the big bad rangers are cheating Let's just see how many decisions Celtic get in their favour today they've made around 20 points as a result of bad refereeing decisions so they are in no place to complain Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueballss 2,969 Posted May 11, 2008 Share Posted May 11, 2008 i honestly dont know?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricksen_da_best 2,034 Posted May 11, 2008 Share Posted May 11, 2008 Because Celtic paid the ref and he still didnt give them! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kirkiebear 1,013 Posted May 11, 2008 Share Posted May 11, 2008 Knew this was going to happen. After watching the setanta highlights iam in no doubt that crocker and booth hate rangers, booth actually went as far as saying what was the point of united playing, he sounded like he was greeting when he was saying it as well. Yet these are the 2 commentators who turned a blind eye to almost all of the wrong decisions that went against us in recent weeks and the old firm games. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Bear 7 Posted May 11, 2008 Share Posted May 11, 2008 Knew this was going to happen. After watching the setanta highlights iam in no doubt that crocker and booth hate rangers, booth actually went as far as saying what was the point of united playing, he sounded like he was greeting when he was saying it as well. Yet these are the 2 commentators who turned a blind eye to almost all of the wrong decisions that went against us in recent weeks and the old firm games. The mhedia has been waiting for a couple of doubtful decisions that go our way - that's why it is getting blown out of proportion. They need to shift the attention away from the St Mirren, Aberdeen Old Firm, etc games that have all favoured Sellick. As far as Satan TV is concerned - is it just me or is the pressure getting to Crocker and Booth? They cannot hide their bias - just watched highlights of yesterday's game - we were great, well worth a 2-goal lead and all they could say was what if Utd scored, what if it was a penalty, what if big Weir was sent off (well he wouldn't have deflected that shot) what if the disallowed goal had stood, what if Cousin had got sent off for his blatant head butt on the angelic Lee Wilkie. My subscription to Satan TV ends soon - it will not be renewed! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bastian30 0 Posted May 11, 2008 Share Posted May 11, 2008 Cetanta has always favoured septik , so why shud we pay to watch there channel for them to rip into us , i suggest everyone writting a wee email and complain an advise them we will no longer be purchasing celtanta tv channel Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts