Jump to content

NorthUistBear

First Team
  • Posts

    2,437
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by NorthUistBear

  1. Yes he is but if we fail to win the league then he should walk. explain why it is walters fault our chairman has not given him the resourses to work with? Was he not given money after he got us knocked out of Europe by a pub team. and do you not agree that he spent the money well and won us the league and took us to 2 cup finals? Lafferty, Bougherra, Mendes, Davis and Edu were brought in and each did their bit towards that. And the only reason we got beat by a 'pub team' is because yet again our chairman did not give walter resourses until Cuellar was sold after that game. We should have been able to beat the pub team with our reserves. lol true and minstral i aint argueing with you. lol i agree with alot of what you say on here. lol I am not arguing all i was saying was if we dont win the league then Walter should walk away, and yes you are correct Murray should give Walter the money to bring in players. he did that last time though, he walked when we lost 10 in a row. so he prob will. anyway this is silly, of course we are going to win the league! lol I think we will win it if we can stay clear of injurys. definately. but i dunno if weir is capable of 50 odd games. who knows thoguh. lol
  2. i have too but not a poll! lol
  3. Yes he is but if we fail to win the league then he should walk. explain why it is walters fault our chairman has not given him the resourses to work with? Was he not given money after he got us knocked out of Europe by a pub team. and do you not agree that he spent the money well and won us the league and took us to 2 cup finals? Lafferty, Bougherra, Mendes, Davis and Edu were brought in and each did their bit towards that. And the only reason we got beat by a 'pub team' is because yet again our chairman did not give walter resourses until Cuellar was sold after that game. We should have been able to beat the pub team with our reserves. lol true and minstral i aint argueing with you. lol i agree with alot of what you say on here. lol I am not arguing all i was saying was if we dont win the league then Walter should walk away, and yes you are correct Murray should give Walter the money to bring in players. he did that last time though, he walked when we lost 10 in a row. so he prob will. anyway this is silly, of course we are going to win the league! lol
  4. lafferty was signed between 1st and 2nd leg and came on with a minute to go because he was not ready. if bougie mendes davis and edu were also involved we would have won sorry he was actually on bench first leg. , my bad!!
  5. and well done for bein able to count but lafferty actuallty cost £3.25m!
  6. lafferty was signed between 1st and 2nd leg and came on with a minute to go because he was not ready. if bougie mendes davis and edu were also involved we would have won
  7. according to the sun newcastle are going to offer him a contract giving him 3 times the wage that we're willing to pay. yes and thats why they let him go at end of last season and didnt tell him! and again and once more ffs
  8. Yes he is but if we fail to win the league then he should walk. explain why it is walters fault our chairman has not given him the resourses to work with? Was he not given money after he got us knocked out of Europe by a pub team. and do you not agree that he spent the money well and won us the league and took us to 2 cup finals? Lafferty, Bougherra, Mendes, Davis and Edu were brought in and each did their bit towards that. And the only reason we got beat by a 'pub team' is because yet again our chairman did not give walter resourses until Cuellar was sold after that game. We should have been able to beat the pub team with our reserves. lol true and minstral i aint argueing with you. lol i agree with alot of what you say on here. lol
  9. Yes he is but if we fail to win the league then he should walk. explain why it is walters fault our chairman has not given him the resourses to work with? Was he not given money after he got us knocked out of Europe by a pub team. and do you not agree that he spent the money well and won us the league and took us to 2 cup finals? Lafferty, Bougherra, Mendes, Davis and Edu were brought in and each did their bit towards that. And the only reason we got beat by a 'pub team' is because yet again our chairman did not give walter resourses until Cuellar was sold after that game.
  10. Yes he is but if we fail to win the league then he should walk. explain why it is walters fault our chairman has not given him the resourses to work with?
  11. lol i put him in for comedy factor! haha
  12. this shows what a good man walter smith is. the only bad thing about this thread is that it will bring out the anti walter smith fans. they need to get a grip. walter smith is a rangers legend and a fantastic manager and man.
  13. to be fair though i dont think many keepers in the world would have saved that shot by st mirren. lol
  14. Mixed opinions so lets see who the majority want? I'd Pick McGregor. no dis respect to alexander. or adam
  15. i think we could win with this :alexander: :whittaker: :bougherra: :wilson: :ssmith: :aaron: :shinnie: :mcculloch: :fleck: :boyd:
  16. it will be :mcgregor: :whittaker: :weir: : :bougherra: :papac: :davis: :mcculloch: :fleck: :boyd: :miller: i would like to see :alexander: :whittaker: :weir: :bougherra: :ssmith: :davis: :mcculloch: :thomson: :boyd: :miller:
  17. get it right up him. a million dollar fanny. good player when he wanted to be but a bit of a liability. imagine how many more important games he would have been sent off in if he was still here.
  18. and your giving the thumbs up to that? ffs your mad. and you obviously cant be serious? do you remember kyle when he played for scotland? a big diddy. i would be raging if i seen a line up in the camp nou or berbabau or old trafford with kevin bloody kyle spearheading our attack. . you cannot be serious, are u?
  19. good to see the majority of us want our best striker to stay. obviously the ones who said no are happy enough with us not having a striker capable of 30-40 goals in a season lol
  20. his defending is horrific. he struggles at the best of time in the SPL i'm dreading the CL with whittaker in the RB berth. You certainly can't knock the guy for his ability to go forward tho. who would you prefer? broadfoot? cos i'm afraid hutton aint comin back....................................................................just yet!lol
  21. Rubbish Teams win leagues, not individuals. We won the league because McGregor and Alexander made saves. The defence played well The midfield produced some quality and the frontmen all chipped in With Boyd Without Boyd Rangers 2-1 Kilmarnock Boyd(2) Rangers 0-1 Kilmarnock Hamilton 1-3 Rangers Boyd(2) Hamilton 1-1 Rangers Dundee Utd 2-2 Rangers Boyd(1) Dundee Utd 2-1 Rangers Rangers 1-0 Hibs Boyd Rangers 0-0 Hibs Rangers 3-1 Falkirk Boyd(2) Rangers 1-1 Falkirk Falkirk 0-1 Rangers Boyd Falkirk 0-0 Rangers St Mirren 1-2 Rangers Boyd(1) St Mirren 1-1 Rangers Rangers 3-1 Motherwell Boyd(2) Rangers 1-1 Motherwell 17 points dropped! lol you cant really use that data tho because who is to say that which ever player filled boyds boots on that day wouldn't have made an even better contribution to the scoreline I think we are a much better team without boyd playing. You can see the difference every time he comes off the park as a sub and is replaced. Look at saturday for example.Yeh we were winning 3-1 when he was taken off but the forward line link so much better when boyd was removed from the equation. lol i know pal, it was a joke. hense the lol i know it was a joke hence the lol i know mate. boyd is an inigma. always will be while at rangers but you cannot write him off. his goals are so vitaly important. a replacement would probably not have scored 30 last season.
  22. Where are you getting the money from? lol And explain why whittaker is not good enough?
×
×
  • Create New...