will_1974

Fair enough. I just think that is flawed to automatically credit someone as a success without knowing what they actually did. If Warburton brings him in as No 2 I'll support them both. I just have some reservations about Weir as a coach based upon his time at Sheff Utd.

And if he doesn't?

Didn't see any quotes about them coming as a package. If Warburton comes and brings Weir with him you are correct, he must believe in him. I just think there are better options out there and a strong manager needs to put sentiment aside and pick the best No 2 he can.

I'm a middle manager. I have three supervisors who work for me. One is very good, one is average, the other is poor and has made no contribution to our successes. By your logic he is a good supervisor.

I call it the McCoist factor. Had a reasonable rep as a No 2. But hopeless as Manager. We don't know if Weir is good as a No 2, because like McCoist was he is given credit for the success of others.My point is that if we judge him on what he has done alone in management he wouldnt get in the building.

First of all we don't know if he is coming at all. His performance as a manager is relevant. It shows his capability. He failed as a manager. Being no 2 to a successful Warburton previously gives us no indication of his ability. Would rather it was someone else.

Because he was a disaster at sheff united

Would rather Warburton was joining without Weir tbh.

Bet victor 1/5

No thanks.

Over the past two years just about every Rangers Media user commented upon how we wasted an opportunity to get it right. At every turn those in charge have chosen through fear the negative option. Hearts made a bold appointment and got their rewards. It is time to make positive long term decisions.

The problem is that McCall, and particularly McCleish will offer a tired brand of football. I have no doubt that if either got the job everyone would be moaning within weeks. McCall did not do enough in the time he had to make him serious candidate and Eck's signing record on balance is poor, plus he'll want top dollar.

Well put.

Again I don't disagree that Pereira and Warburton are much better applicants. But Pereira might not be interested (speculation is that he has lost interest due to not getting promoted), Warburton might have priced himself out the job.(speculation is that he was wanting quite big money) The speculation might be bs but if it is true and Cathro had a good interview and is not wanting big cash to me it seems a good bet to go for him.

I don't disagree. But sometimes people don't want to come, change their mind, or don't meet your expectations after speaking to them, or someone shines that you didn't expect. I can remember going for a job and getting it after having a cracking interview. I was told afterwards that I'd caused them a bit of a headache as they had been 100% sure beforehand that someone else would have been best at interview.

Why speak to him them?

I think it will be Cathro. Speaking to the likes of Pereira and Warburton is great. I just have a feeling that they'll price themselves out the job.

Encouraged by the names we've been linked with. Cathro Warburton Pereira You could make a case for each of them. Cathro probably the riskiest but the cheapest appointment. Pereira the safest and costliest.

Such a big decision I think we should advertise the vacancy, deadline of 10 days time for expressions of interest. Interview top five applicants after papersift.

Danny Wilson too

Thanks

Was he not on here before touting himself for a move.

For RB Mitchell Weiser For CB JAN-ARIE VAN DER HEIJDEN

I think we'll keep improving although we are up against a decent team in Hearts next. Another weeks training and coaching. One or two changes and we should have a reasonable chance.

Said it when McCall joined. It will take two to three weeks to get them fit. Most look about half a stone overweight.