Gowser

No one actually knows what we do with regards to warnings against members of the forum. The only people who know are the ones doing the warning and the ones getting said warning. So it is a bit unfair to suggest that anyone who says something against the fish is being warned. Nothing anyone says on these threads goes un-noticed and if you like you are allowed to complain to the admin team about any member of the board. You also have the ability to block any member of the board I have only ever been warned publically i.e. not by PM, but within the thread; I have never seen that happen to THE FISH, so I would therefore presume he has never been warned. If he has been warned by PM, does that suggest favouritism? After all, everyone else is given a public humilation!!! The fish has had many thread warnings, you obviously aren't there at the time, but I can assure you he has. With respect to PM. That was never brought up in my post. However, if we do see a serious breach of rules, then that person will be approached in PM. I would argue that your "humiliation" is nothing more than a warning to watch your language and to be careful how you talk to other forum members No offence but I don't believe you, can you please link me to a thread where the Fish has been publically warned for his behaviour. Cheers

No one actually knows what we do with regards to warnings against members of the forum. The only people who know are the ones doing the warning and the ones getting said warning. So it is a bit unfair to suggest that anyone who says something against the fish is being warned. Nothing anyone says on these threads goes un-noticed and if you like you are allowed to complain to the admin team about any member of the board. You also have the ability to block any member of the board I have only ever been warned publically i.e. not by PM, but within the thread; I have never seen that happen to THE FISH, so I would therefore presume he has never been warned. If he has been warned by PM, does that suggest favouritism? After all, everyone else is given a public humilation!!!

Spot on mate. For some reason though they believe the biggest Gers slagger on this board to the biggest Gers fan. I don't get it either. Maybe the mods think it makes the boards more entertaining with an "enemy" on board

Personally, I think Gowser is overstating this factor. What I mean is I think the swearing rule is more so for abusive language then say Muffger saying that Papac is shite. I don't think this happens a helluva alot tbh but it does happen, yes the claim of not supporting Rangers but this will always be the case for Fish - defending him but its a fact. As for you thinking I have overstated the swearing factor, check out this link to a topic I started last weekend, Nvager says no verions of the "F" word "period", but since I have seen him giving variations the thumbs up; hence my point. http://forum.rangersmedia.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=35182 So it's either period, as he made out to me, or just when being abusive, and how can you tell the difference anyway? I don't mean to single him out, but I started that topic as a laugh and he got all serious on me with that reply. When I read the forum the rest of the week, what am I meant to think. Rules for one group, rules for the other. :barf:

In my personal opinion this seems similar to the Albahighlander situation, and I personally had lots of arguments with him. I believe he eventually got banned, although I have no idea, because I actually stopped using this site for a long period because I seemed to get warned constantly and have threads closed for arguing with him and I felt as if my opinions were being stifled. I came back eventually and have enjoyed the site more to a certain extent. The Moderation on here however is not fair. I am told no sweraing whatsoever is allowed, but I see Mods and Admins swearing, or sweraing in abbreviation all the time. No consistency. And there lies the biggest problem. It's not one rule for all. I have also seen threads where The Fish has slagged people, perhaps claimed they do not support Rangers, or has called them an offensive name; those people have then responded and they seem to be the ones gettig warned. That makes no sense to me. But I am but a lowly occasional poster, what would I know

I predict many more of these this season Well deserved.

Well excuse me. Happened to be out all day at the hospital and my partner didn't have any news for me bar the Faye signing and when I had a quick look on here earlier I never noticed it. I'll just quietly go and read every post from last night and this morning now....

Just flashed up on Sky Sports News

As portrayed by Adolf Hitler

Nothing wrong with what he said, I agree with it. MAIR LIKE THE FISH TALKING PISH AGAIN.

Thomson has a similar role to Hemdani however, he can run forward and attack, unlike the aforementioned. I find Hemdani a very good player in European matches, however, domestically, I find he is easily pushed off the ball and not suited for our quick, aggressive game. If he leaves, we will miss him in Europe, but if that's the only matches he will be played in, can you see him wanting to stay?

Probably trying to extract his head from sand. Hopefully his head is stuck and we won't have any more RANDOM, SHOUTING, USELESS, THREAD WASTING, POINTLESS, SHOUTS IN BIG BOLD BLUE Feckin hell, how much longer do we have to suffer this pish, I mean Fish

It's good to see others thinking like me. I'd said this to my mates before we'd even played the first leg of the Red Star game. Going by the friendly, which wasn't played much like one, I'd been hoping, prematurely, that we'd get them in the group stages. Easy points.

If you are referring to this season in general, I think you are very much mistaken. As for tonight's match, he didn't seem to tackle as much, but I think he had been warned that the Ref's eyes would be on him due to the fact that Red Star had singled him out in press releases and was wary of their diving tactics considering he had already been given a red in a European match this season.

Watching the Barry, Beasley show in that corner. Quote from a caller on Gers TV phone in. Quality

Anyone else agree that we will sign him by the end of the week? John Brown on Rangers TV says "The money's there now and he's the ideal player". Derek Ferguson says "Hopefully everything will be ok and he can come to Rangers" Here's hoping!!

At the bounce up, at the Rangers penalty box, Barry points as if to say I'll punt it up the park, and Koroman stole it and passed to his mate 10 yards away to start an attack and Barry shouts "Heyyyy ya f*cking C*nt!!" And the commentator says someting like "you can hear how much Ferguson was annoyed by that move".

Hands off , he's a Ger and he'll stay a Ger!

McGregor for me, couple of brilliant saves. How did Letizi get picked over him last year?!?! JCD and Hemdani are a close second for me. Can't quite decide who's 2nd and who's 3rd though!!

I've seen that a hundred times now and still laugh. I'm hoping that do a sketh of it for Only an Excuse this year!

Spot on.

I've been slagging the fans who have shouted this shit etc. but I was very pleased that I never heard anything today. Typical of this trash rag. The SPL only have to read the official's report and watch the replay to realise they're talking pish. The big question is, when they find that Rangers done nothing wrong, will they take action against those who falsely accused us so as to make news?

No I won't be happy, I'll be raging, but not at the SPL or Martin Bain. I'll be angry at the fans who persist with the bigotry despite all the warnings. And I will not only be angry at those fans, but also at anyone who didn't speak out against these unfair regulations. The fans may be at the heart of the problem but there is no excuse for point docking. It's just lazyness from the SFA and self-servitude from the Scottish Excecutive. You talk one load of nonesense. It's only the fans that can get us into the position of having ponits docked anyway, whether or not they speak out against the point docking. It's a law that's in our game now and the fans must understand that they have to abide by it and if they don't there will be consequences. The ponit docking will be a last resort anyway. We'll get fined first, maybe even the second time, but after that they have to do something that will have more of an impact. I wonder if you'll feel so benevolent towards these said fans if Rangers lose the league this year because we've been docked points. And since when have I ever shown "benevolance" to the sectarian crowd? In my post that you quoted I stated that they make me angry. Read before you reply. And just because the fans are singing doesnt mean that It should be taken out on the team and innocent fans like me I did read your post - "And I will not be angry at those fans". Maybe you should read what you write before you actually post. It says "not only be angry." Nice edit, I just don't understand how every quote was edited. Who's the Mod/Admin that you're mates with?