Barbarrosa
-
Posts
341 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Downloads
Posts posted by Barbarrosa
-
-
10 minutes ago, siddiqi_drinker said:
Not sure if you just don't listen or if you are lacking basic comprehension skills.
Hodson turned up in the morning sick, certainly looked off the pace, substituted.
Wallace had a well-documented stomach injury after the jockobite match, he was risked and then substituted. The alternate LB was also coming off a hamstring injury.
Hill tight hamstring.
You can only play the hand you are dealt.
Being fit at kick-off doesn't mean you can finish a game otherwise we would never have had the substitute rule.
Judging a manager after two games, fukking lunatic.
What I'm saying is, if your star player is a risk, it might be a risk worth taking. If three ordinary players are a risk, tell them to take the day off
-
10 minutes ago, yermaw145 said:
We've got the right man
Who's we?
-
31 minutes ago, Dietspam said:
You mean Murty who brought on Garner on the 89th minute?
Yes, that's the chap I'm referring to
-
23 minutes ago, siddiqi_drinker said:
you do realise three of our defenders were injured/sick, don't you?
Folk saying it was a risk playing Wallace should remember Halliday is just coming off a hamstring injury, helluva choice for the manager.
Three defenders totally fit at 3pm but then not fit enough to finish the game ?
Fuck off. If they were that unfit they shouldn't have started. Pedro hasn't got a scooby
-
Even with injuries, not for me. Rather have Murty
-
On 03/30/2017 at 9:43 PM, falwheel said:
Any win will do, I just really enjoy laughing at Scott MacDonald. Not sure why he pisses me off so much. I would go as far to say that I almost hate him ?
A Few weeks ago I'd also have said any win will do. However I think we're better than that now. I want to see a good performance and a comfortable win.
Especially after last nights result.
-
26 minutes ago, Smile said:
This for me Murray not a stupid man and would not have been duped by Whyte.
If he was trying buy a house or a car of DM you can bet there would have been checks to ensure the funds were actually there
-
45 minutes ago, Blue Avenger said:
What is his disagreement with this ruling really telling us?
That thanks to his involvement the shares are really worth fuck all.
-
1 minute ago, FSM said:
TAB: "You have to offer to buy everybody's shares for 20p each Dave".
Dave to shareholder: "I'll give to 20p for your shares".
Shareholder "Naw".
Dave "Fair enough".
The last line is more like Dave "thank fuck"
-
2 minutes ago, Copland bear said:
He is gonna take it, a lot of big shareholders he can wipe out but it's us little guys we are the real losers.
Jeezo. He can't take anything he just has to make an offer. It's up to you whether or not you take the offer.
-
Nobody is being forced to sell at 20p or any other price. When an individual or group of individuals acting in concert take 30% of a company they must then offer to buy all the remaining shares.
DK tried to get round this by claiming that he and the 3 Bears acted independently. The TAB have seen through this
-
It felt like a win so I've got no problem celebrating it as such.
If there's a downside it might that DK might think everything is now rosy and there's only minimum investment needed.
However that's a worry for another day. For now let's just enjoy
-
21 minutes ago, standup said:
A draw that feels like a win that should have been a win.
Came on to say that. Felt like a win should have been a win
-
HIm and King will make a good double act.
A bull fighter and a bull shitter
-
He should get £10M and should be able to make some difference if it's spent wisely. In Jan it's likely to be loans or purchases financed by sales.
Then next summer another £10m and that would see us in a position to mount a serious challenge.
£20m over two seasons could make a difference, and shouldn't be beyond us. Alas I fear it will be.
-
Could we try putting the net infront of the goal rather than behind it
-
1 minute ago, The Godfather said:
I think we need our back 4 at 100% to stand a chance more than the attackers tbh.
That's our big weakness especially against the pace they have going forward.Probably right but I was thinking about creating something rather than preventing them.
Also if Hyndman and McKay have the ball then their pace can't hurt us.
-
3 minutes ago, Gaz52 said:
I've not seen enough of Forest or Roberts to compare them with McKay but I've seen taigs on Twitter etc say he's the only one from our team they'd have.
You not think Hyndman would get in?
Possibly kind of overlooked him as he's only on loan. Be interesting to see how him and McKay do on Sunday. We need both of them at 100% to have a chance
-
How many of our players would get into their side? I honestly think none. So it comes down to teamwork and tactics.
The last two games have shown that the team spirit is there, and the players will battle for each other.
However I worry about leaving Mury in charge for this, even if he has experienced people advising him.
-
2 minutes ago, JR said:
The original article from Sky didn't mention Gardening leave but interesting nonetheless.
Get him and Ally in. We might not win much but we'll have some fucking pitch.
-
This is worrying. No way should he even be considered. Fair play two decent wins but no where near good enough.
Hope King isn't going to try and sell this to us
-
Well I was right about it being a high scoring game. Hope we get StMirren in the semis
-
2 minutes ago, Lloyd72 said:
Appealing Kiernans ban is surely a sackable offence
If we're lucky they'll make it 4 matches
-
I can see this being a high scoring game. 4-3 I'll go for.
Both teams have issues in defence and an identical record of 3 defeats 2 wins and a draw in the last few games
Caixinha
in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
Posted
Sorry not buying it. One player maybe but surely to fuck we can cover two out of three crocks