Rangers_Youth 6 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 bit baffled by this signing tbh good player but not a position that is a prioroty and as to why we paid 1.5 for him yet didnt and dnt wana pay that for goodwillie, granted hes got this court case, and maybe utd stated 2 million or whatever but a bid of 1.5 would do it imo!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ogbg 20 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 bit baffled by this signing tbh good player but not a position that is a prioroty and as to why we paid 1.5 for him yet didnt and dnt wana pay that for goodwillie, granted hes got this court case, and maybe utd stated 2 million or whatever but a bid of 1.5 would do it imo!!I think you answered your own question there Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangers_Youth 6 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 I think you answered your own question thereI didnt ask a question! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricksen_da_best 2,034 Posted July 22, 2011 Author Share Posted July 22, 2011 Baffled we paid 1.5million for a LB, when we could pay that for Goodwillie.Just as likely Wallace will have another serious injury, as likely it is young david will get the jail! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ogbg 20 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 I didnt ask a question!Not explicitly, but you were baffled "as to why we didn't pay that for Goodwillie". Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangers_Youth 6 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 correct I stated I`m baffled as to why we didn`t want to pay that for goodwillie and incidentally I still am!! I didnt ask you to shed any light on the subject but be my guest Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ogbg 20 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 correct I stated I`m baffled as to why we didn`t want to pay that for goodwillie and incidentally I still am!! I didnt ask you to shed any light on the subject but be my guestit's because he might go to jail Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangers_Youth 6 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 yeah of course, i get that but why make any bid in the first place?? i dont really see why we have went out and spent that money on a position that isn`t a priority! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ogbg 20 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 yeah of course, i get that but why make any bid in the first place?? i dont really see why we have went out and spent that money on a position that isn`t a priority!how is it not a priority? we only had one left back before signing wallace Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangers_Youth 6 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 why make the bid in the first place then?? well when papac was out after the tarrier game whittaker slotted in and was outstanding at left back plus ortiz can play in either full back position if and when papac is unavailable so enough cover imo!! would have preferred to see us sign a forward but if the money is there put aside for one its academic Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.