Jimfanciesthedude 24,958 Posted September 29, 2013 Share Posted September 29, 2013 Where did we earn 20 million last season before including the ipo Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AMcK 92 Posted September 29, 2013 Share Posted September 29, 2013 Where did we earn 20 million last season before including the ipoTurnover for last season will have been close to £20M. I'm sure accounts will confirm this when they are released. Then you have the £5.75M raised prior to the IPO. That's before you consider those who bought in earlier in the season like Mather (£1M). Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Atheist 178 Posted September 29, 2013 Share Posted September 29, 2013 Personally I am find it increasingly difficult to support the current board but can understand that people want to wait for audited accounts before forming an opinion. That is perhaps why many fans will disagree with yesterday's protest."Aye but somehow we need to wait for the accounts before we can judge. Ridiculous." - You half an hour ago on Twitter.Has something happened in the last few hours to change your mind from being "understanding" of fans' reluctance to turn on the board to labelling that mindset "ridiculous"?Just wondering. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AMcK 92 Posted September 29, 2013 Share Posted September 29, 2013 "Aye but somehow we need to wait for the accounts before we can judge. Ridiculous." - You half an hour ago on Twitter.Has something happened in the last few hours to change your mind from being "understanding" of fans' reluctance to turn on the board to labelling that mindset "ridiculous"?Just wondering. Take the comment in context. My reply was in relation to comment made about board threatening fans with legal action. We can judge that without the need for accounts. Board have plenty of failings outside of their financial performance and accounts aren't needed to judge those actions or decisions. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Atheist 178 Posted September 29, 2013 Share Posted September 29, 2013 Take the comment in context. My reply was in relation to comment made about board threatening fans with legal action. We can judge that without the need for accounts. Board have plenty of failings outside of their financial performance and accounts aren't needed to judge those actions or decisions.Fair enough. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvern 11,329 Posted September 29, 2013 Share Posted September 29, 2013 Fair enough.Two opposing Gers fans in agreement SHOCKER!Front page of the Daily Rhebel right there ;-) Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 Should it not be the Rangers board providing us the fans with the evidence? If people accused you of doing someting wrong and you knew they were lying would you prove them wrong?So far this board haven't done this.No I would not react all the time to rumours I was not doing my job correctly - if I was doing my job I would just wait to publish the accounts. The board do NOT have to prove every time there is an accusation that they are doing things right - what a waste of management time. As in law it is up to the a users to prove fault - not the accused to prove innocence Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Young Bob 1,360 Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 I saw some chaps in CF1 with an action not apathy banner and they certainly took action. I would guess they were in row H and in the 73rd minute they left the stadium. Wasn't a lot of support around them for their protest so I guess they had a beer to catch in the Louden or had a desire to get on the underground without queueing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.