StublueKPL 524 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Re. the parts you highlighted.1. That is one of the reasons they are in court and why I said they had a maximum of 5%2. Again as per my previous post they tried to have the AGM delayed before the case was heard but failed3. The petitioners agree, but they only account for between 0.71% and 5.03% of the shareholders. They are saying that they are happy, but they don't speak for the other shareholders. There is an assumption there that there are no other objections. I hope that assumption is correctThis place would go mental if it was suggested that Paul Murray was removing shareholders' rights to 21 days consideration of the resolutions which is what would happen if that ruling was binding on all shareholderslisburn. You are by far the best poster on here who supports the rst and more people like you could convert guys who are reluctant. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lisburnranger 36 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 lisburn. You are by far the best poster on here who supports the rst and more people like you could convert guys who are reluctant.Why thank you kind sir Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted October 13, 2013 Author Share Posted October 13, 2013 Re. the parts you highlighted.1. That is one of the reasons they are in court and why I said they had a maximum of 5%2. Again as per my previous post they tried to have the AGM delayed before the case was heard but failed3. The petitioners agree, but they only account for between 0.71% and 5.03% of the shareholders. They are saying that they are happy, but they don't speak for the other shareholders. There is an assumption there that there are no other objections. I hope that assumption is correctThis place would go mental if it was suggested that Paul Murray was removing shareholders' rights to 21 days consideration of the resolutions which is what would happen if that ruling was binding on all shareholdersAs I said the club disagree with you as I do, the AGM goes ahead as planned, that is not an assumption that is a clear statement by the board.The Annual General Meeting of the Company is, therefore, set to proceed on October 24, 2013. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StublueKPL 524 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Why thank you kind siri still have serious issues, but more guys like you onboard and it it can only help.Anyway, we all want one thing: the rangers back where they belong. NS Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgacus 88 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 The board as not managed to do what the IPO prospectus said they would do - so how can anyone claim they are a success? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgacus 88 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 "As I said the club disagree with you as I do, the AGM goes ahead as planned, that is not an assumption that is a clear statement by the board."This Board havemade plenty of other clear statement that turned out to be rubbish Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluepeter 5,627 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 lisburn. You are by far the best poster on here who supports the rst and more people like you could convert guys who are reluctant.Completely agree with this - Lisburnranger is a credit to his organisation Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lisburnranger 36 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 As I said the club disagree with you as I do, the AGM goes ahead as planned, that is not an assumption that is a clear statement by the board.The Annual General Meeting of the Company is, therefore, set to proceed on October 24, 2013.We could go round in circles all day and never agree, so we'll probably need to wait and see. Since I always like to have the last word, a clear statement would have said - The Annual General Meeting of the Company will, therefore, proceed on October 24 2013 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lisburnranger 36 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 I'm feeling the love here guys, much appreciated.On a serious note, I strongly believe that fan ownership is the only way we can secure the long term security of our club. Despite our differences we all have one major thing in common and that is a desire to see our team become successful and sustainable again. As an organisation, the RST has obstacles to overcome in order to grow to a size that will give us a realistic opportunity to achieve our goals. We are always looking to improve as an organisation. I implore anyone who believes in fan ownership, but dislikes the RST for whatever reason, join and change it from within. We have made massive strides in the last 12 months and want to keep that improvement going. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted October 13, 2013 Author Share Posted October 13, 2013 We could go round in circles all day and never agree, so we'll probably need to wait and see. Since I always like to have the last word, a clear statement would have said -The Annual General Meeting of the Company will, therefore, proceed on October 24 2013 The statement is clear enough, even for those who don't want it to be, hopefully the hostiles see sense and withdraw tomorrow. DK has no love or time for fan ownership. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StublueKPL 524 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 "As I said the club disagree with you as I do, the AGM goes ahead as planned, that is not an assumption that is a clear statement by the board."This Board havemade plenty of other clear statement that turned out to be rubbishthere is always one to put a damper on fans getting on a wee bit.So what's your solution? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lisburnranger 36 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 The statement is clear enough, even for those who don't want it to be, hopefully the hostiles see sense and withdraw tomorrow. DK has no love or time for fan ownership.I spoke to a friend of mine who is a corporate lawyer and I asked his opinion. It was heavily caveated with "based on the information available", but he was of the impression that Murray and co would be successful. A key point here is that there will be much that we haven't heard so far. I only hope the AGM goes ahead as planned regardless of the outcome Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StublueKPL 524 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 What have we become eh? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StublueKPL 524 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 And that's not a dig at Lisburn or bawsburst before anyone says it Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muirheadbear 1,483 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 And that's not a dig at Lisburn or bawsburst before anyone says itThat's a dig at Lisburn and Bawsburst! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lisburnranger 36 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 What have we become eh?It's really sad when you look at it. I long for the day I can go back to just moaning or worrying about events on the pitch.I better make it clear, I asked the question about the court case when I was gathering information regarding resolutions 9 and 10 for Thursdays meeting Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverBlue_Since91 2,895 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 The only bit i care about in that story is.."Having settled his tax dispute with the South African Revenue Service, King would not face any difficulties over the SFA's fit and proper person criteria." Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
glasgowrangersno1 468 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Re. the parts you highlighted.1. That is one of the reasons they are in court and why I said they had a maximum of 5%2. Again as per my previous post they tried to have the AGM delayed before the case was heard but failed3. The petitioners agree, but they only account for between 0.71% and 5.03% of the shareholders. They are saying that they are happy, but they don't speak for the other shareholders. There is an assumption there that there are no other objections. I hope that assumption is correctThis place would go mental if it was suggested that Paul Murray was removing shareholders' rights to 21 days consideration of the resolutions which is what would happen if that ruling was binding on all shareholdersI thought the petitioners/requesitioners represented some of the large institutional investors? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shankillblue1 349 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 They represent rag, taig and bobtail !! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 I'm feeling the love here guys, much appreciated.On a serious note, I strongly believe that fan ownership is the only way we can secure the long term security of our club. Despite our differences we all have one major thing in common and that is a desire to see our team become successful and sustainable again. As an organisation, the RST has obstacles to overcome in order to grow to a size that will give us a realistic opportunity to achieve our goals. We are always looking to improve as an organisation. I implore anyone who believes in fan ownership, but dislikes the RST for whatever reason, join and change it from within. We have made massive strides in the last 12 months and want to keep that improvement going.You know exactly what's needed to make the RST grow Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 I spoke to a friend of mine who is a corporate lawyer and I asked his opinion. It was heavily caveated with "based on the information available", but he was of the impression that Murray and co would be successful. A key point here is that there will be much that we haven't heard so far. I only hope the AGM goes ahead as planned regardless of the outcomeHas Murray promised the RST (or any of its members) anything?Has he committed to fan ownership which is after all your raisin d'être? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Army 4,146 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Completely agree with this - Lisburnranger is a credit to his organisation I would agree and he puts the rest to shame, Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Army 4,146 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 I thought the petitioners/requesitioners represented some of the large institutional investors?I thought the petitioners/requesitioners represented some of the large institutional investors?So did you alter ego DeliriousDennis, I think he mentioned the figure of 28% a few time. (hourly) Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
glasgowrangersno1 468 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 So did you alter ego DeliriousDennis, I think he mentioned the figure of 28% a few time. (hourly)Rap the pish, it's boring.Knew I hadn't made it up:In a statement, a spokesman for the requisitioners said: "We embarked on this exercise seven weeks ago at the request of shareholders speaking for 28% of the club's shares.http://www.heraldscotland.com/mobile/sport/football/rangers-shareholders-claim-clubs-broker-blocked-compromise-agreement-with-current-dir.1379068511?_=aced6dedd8203df3cb3d81f46c263fd71b7b3e48 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lisburnranger 36 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Has Murray promised the RST (or any of its members) anything?Has he committed to fan ownership which is after all your raisin d'être?There have been no promises made as far as I'm aware. He has indicated that he is keen on supporter representation/ownership and we quoted it in a recent statement. Personally I would like him to say it publicly. He's had and will continue to have plenty of opportunities to do this. Again in my personal opinion he needs to give fans something to back. As far as I can see there is no indication of his plans or even who will run the club if the executives are voted off Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.