BLUEDIGNITY 34,197 Posted July 4, 2007 Share Posted July 4, 2007 . . . Glasgow unless a fee has been rubber stamped. Either he's not that keen or they doesn't trust somebody ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poetry_In_Blue 1,043 Posted July 4, 2007 Share Posted July 4, 2007 Old news, has been posted before with the appropriate articles, and he is quite correct, why should he travel to Glasgow if a fee hasn't been agreed? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JR 1,480 Posted July 4, 2007 Share Posted July 4, 2007 . . . Glasgow unless a fee has been rubber stamped. Either he's not that keen or they doesn't trust somebody ? He CANT travel unless a fee has been rubber stamped - its not up to him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 34,197 Posted July 4, 2007 Author Share Posted July 4, 2007 . . . Glasgow unless a fee has been rubber stamped. Either he's not that keen or they doesn't trust somebody ? He CANT travel unless a fee has been rubber stamped - its not up to himBeen known for players to come and give the place the once over before talks begin has in not ? How do tou mean then he CAN'T travel and who is it up to then ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JR 1,480 Posted July 4, 2007 Share Posted July 4, 2007 . . . Glasgow unless a fee has been rubber stamped. Either he's not that keen or they doesn't trust somebody ? He CANT travel unless a fee has been rubber stamped - its not up to himBeen known for players to come and give the place the once over before talks begin has in not ? How do tou mean then he CAN'T travel and who is it up to then ? He can only come over if he is given permission by his current Club - no agreed fee - no permission - no travel Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted July 4, 2007 Share Posted July 4, 2007 . . . Glasgow unless a fee has been rubber stamped. Either he's not that keen or they doesn't trust somebody ? He CANT travel unless a fee has been rubber stamped - its not up to himBeen known for players to come and give the place the once over before talks begin has in not ? How do tou mean then he CAN'T travel and who is it up to then ? Was he not here in about march Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Stars Bearette 1 Posted July 4, 2007 Share Posted July 4, 2007 no hes scared of terrorists get Smeaton to escort him over :9537: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
J_RFC87 766 Posted July 4, 2007 Share Posted July 4, 2007 Surely if he came over before a fee was agreed, this is almost...tapping up? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSuedeSambas 56,545 Posted July 4, 2007 Share Posted July 4, 2007 Surely if he came over before a fee was agreed, this is almost...tapping up?I think it would be JA. I brought a similar point up a few days ago about how we have been allowed to agree personal terms with Celluer if we have infact not agreed a fee with Osasuna.I just don't understand why a team would allow a player to talk to and agree a deal in principle to move elsewhere if they are still a million miles apart in terms of agreeing a fee Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
J_RFC87 766 Posted July 4, 2007 Share Posted July 4, 2007 Surely if he came over before a fee was agreed, this is almost...tapping up?I think it would be JA. I brought a similar point up a few days ago about how we have been allowed to agree personal terms with Celluer if we have infact not agreed a fee with Osasuna.I just don't understand why a team would allow a player to talk to and agree a deal in principle to move elsewhere if they are still a million miles apart in terms of agreeing a fee The Ashley Cole fiasco before he joined Chelsea, was about agreeing wages before the transfer fee was agreedshhh, don't tell UEFA, we're already in enough trouble Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boabe 1 Posted July 4, 2007 Share Posted July 4, 2007 Surely if he came over before a fee was agreed, this is almost...tapping up?I think it would be JA. I brought a similar point up a few days ago about how we have been allowed to agree personal terms with Celluer if we have infact not agreed a fee with Osasuna.I just don't understand why a team would allow a player to talk to and agree a deal in principle to move elsewhere if they are still a million miles apart in terms of agreeing a fee Often teams will let players go and discuss terms before a fee has been agreed mainly because it costs the selling team nothing really, the buying club will usually pay flights/hotels/etc. If the fees agreed the transfer goes through quicker and if not well then its not your fault and youve lost nothing really. All depends on if the selling team some dont like to do things that way as it can unsettle players if a fee isnt agreed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts