OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 1. McDonald late offside goal at Rugby Park gives them 3 points when they should have had 1. [Celtic +2] 2. Combination of McDonald late offside goal at Falkirk , several denied Falkirk penalties as well as McManus evading a red card for breaking a young player's leg, gives them 3 points when they should have had 1. [Celtic +5] 3. Late free-kick for nothing at Love St gives them 3 points when they should have had 1. [Celtic +7] 4. Aberdeen denied late equaliser at Parkhead. 3 points instead of 1. [Celtic +9] 5. McDonald offside goal, Rangers denied penalty, Naylor, Hartley and Vennegoor remaining on the pitch when Whittaker goes off, albeit in the last minute and a penalty that turns out not to be, give Celtic three points when Rangers should have them. [Celtic +12] [Rangers -3] 6. Rescheduling allows Celtic to field McGayday, Hinkel, Brown and Samaras to play against Rangers after Hutton leaves. At 1-1 Vennegoor remains on the park after a series of shocking tackles, assisting in the attack that led to the penalty and the Cuellar red card, as well as scoring the last minute winner, after a nudge by McDonald on Whittaker before he nods across to Vennegoor, give Celtic 3 points that could have went to Rangers. [Celtic +15] [Rangers -6] 7. Tannadice sees Cousin denied a good goal for his arm being in an offside position (arms should not be taken into consideration according to FIFA) and a soft penalty give Dundee Utd 3 points that should have been Rangers. [Celtic +15] [Rangers -9] The final margin is a 24 point swing to Celtic. At this point, we should have 9 points more, and Celtic should have 15 less. We should be 19 points ahead with three games in hand. Cue SPL's rescheduled fixture card and 4 game in a week. I'm sure there are those who say we've had the breaks, but I only really recall Ferguson's goal after handball in the CIS semi V Hearts which was harder to score than the penalty we should have had 30 seconds earlier when Goncalves handled in the box, so does that even count? Let's not forget Thierry Henry's handball into the net to put us behind in Barcelona. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted April 28, 2008 Author Share Posted April 28, 2008 Feel free to add your own. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueben_d 40 Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 1. McDonald late offside goal at Rugby Park gives them 3 points when they should have had 1. [Celtic +2] 2. Combination of McDonald late offside goal at Falkirk , several denied Falkirk as well as McManus evading a red card for breaking a young player's leg, gives them 3 points when they should have had 2. [Celtic +5] 3. Late free-kick for nothing at Love St gives them 3 points when they should have had 1. [Celtic +7] 4. Aberdeen denied late equaliser at Parkhead. 3 points instead of 1. [Celtic +9] 5. McDonald offside goal, Rangers denied penalty, Naylor, Hartley and Vennegoor remaining on the pitch when Whittaker goes off, albeit in the last minute and a penalty that turns out not to be, give Celtic three points when Rangers should have them. [Celtic +12] [Rangers -3] 6. Rescheduling allows Celtic to field McGayday, Hinkel, Brown and Samaras to play against Rangers after Hutton leaves. At 1-1 Vennegoor remains on the park after a series of shocking tackles, assisting in the attack that led to the penalty and the Cuellar red card, as well as scoring the last minute winner, after a nudge by McDonald on Whittaker before he nods across to Vennegoor, give Celtic 3 points that could have went to Rangers. [Celtic +15] [Rangers -6] 7. Tannadice sees Cousin denied a good goal for his arm being in an offside position (arms should not be taken into consideration according to FIFA) and a soft penalty give Dundee Utd 3 points that should have been Rangers. [Celtic +18] [Rangers -9] The final margin is a 27 point swing to Celtic. At this point, we should have 9 points more, and Celtic should have 18 less. We should be 22 points ahead with three games in hand. Cue SPL's rescheduled fixture card and 4 game in a week. I'm sure there are those who say we've had the breaks, but I only really recall Ferguson's goal after handball in the CIS semi V Hearts which was harder to score than the penalty we should have had 30 seconds earlier when Goncalves handled in the box, so does that even count? Let's not forget Thierry Henry's handball into the net to put us behind in Barcelona. dont see how that one is a 6 point swing bud Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,263 Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Much as i agree with a lot of it, can we not be starting to sound like tims in all of this? FUCK THEM ALL, we'll win this league in adversity! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ty 0 Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Don't worry about it dude, nothing we can do now. Plus it won't matter when we win the league. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayrshire_blue 0 Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 The Famines over,send them fuckin home :unionflag: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted April 28, 2008 Author Share Posted April 28, 2008 1. McDonald late offside goal at Rugby Park gives them 3 points when they should have had 1. [Celtic +2] 2. Combination of McDonald late offside goal at Falkirk , several denied Falkirk as well as McManus evading a red card for breaking a young player's leg, gives them 3 points when they should have had 2. [Celtic +5] 3. Late free-kick for nothing at Love St gives them 3 points when they should have had 1. [Celtic +7] 4. Aberdeen denied late equaliser at Parkhead. 3 points instead of 1. [Celtic +9] 5. McDonald offside goal, Rangers denied penalty, Naylor, Hartley and Vennegoor remaining on the pitch when Whittaker goes off, albeit in the last minute and a penalty that turns out not to be, give Celtic three points when Rangers should have them. [Celtic +12] [Rangers -3] 6. Rescheduling allows Celtic to field McGayday, Hinkel, Brown and Samaras to play against Rangers after Hutton leaves. At 1-1 Vennegoor remains on the park after a series of shocking tackles, assisting in the attack that led to the penalty and the Cuellar red card, as well as scoring the last minute winner, after a nudge by McDonald on Whittaker before he nods across to Vennegoor, give Celtic 3 points that could have went to Rangers. [Celtic +15] [Rangers -6] 7. Tannadice sees Cousin denied a good goal for his arm being in an offside position (arms should not be taken into consideration according to FIFA) and a soft penalty give Dundee Utd 3 points that should have been Rangers. [Celtic +15] [Rangers -9] The final margin is a 27 point swing to Celtic. At this point, we should have 9 points more, and Celtic should have 18 less. We should be 22 points ahead with three games in hand. Cue SPL's rescheduled fixture card and 4 game in a week. I'm sure there are those who say we've had the breaks, but I only really recall Ferguson's goal after handball in the CIS semi V Hearts which was harder to score than the penalty we should have had 30 seconds earlier when Goncalves handled in the box, so does that even count? Let's not forget Thierry Henry's handball into the net to put us behind in Barcelona. dont see how that one is a 6 point swing bud Well spotted. I'm changing that to 24 which was my original guess. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueben_d 40 Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 how many of them were the same linesman??? just makes it all the sweeter when we still beat them to the title Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricksen_da_best 2,034 Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Who cares. We are Rangers, We dont need backhanders Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadaready 9,437 Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 I was waiting for a post like this. I am sure there are more...I really am. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davy 68 Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Who cares. We are Rangers, We dont need backhanders A bit of fairness wouldn't go a miss though. But we're just paranoid... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricksen_da_best 2,034 Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Who cares. We are Rangers, We dont need backhanders A bit of fairness wouldn't go a miss though. But we're just paranoid... Let them get on with it, i would rather people think they were the cheats than both of us. F*ck them, f*ck awl of them..There all a bunch of Inbred uneducated useless waste of space toothless b*stards scamming the government millions every year through benifits aswell as claiming benifits through the irish government because there also irish. Pricks! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davy 68 Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Who cares. We are Rangers, We dont need backhanders A bit of fairness wouldn't go a miss though. But we're just paranoid... Let them get on with it, i would rather people think they were the cheats than both of us. F*ck them, f*ck awl of them..There all a bunch of Inbred uneducated useless waste of space toothless b*stards scamming the government millions every year through benifits aswell as claiming benifits through the irish government because there also irish. Pricks! So we should let the referees cheat because they're benefit frauds? You've lost me on this one... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 More reasons to add to my list why I want the league more than ever! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadaready 9,437 Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 The league is balanced against us. We must persevere. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 941 Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Who cares. We are Rangers, We dont need backhanders Are you sure about that? To win this league, I think we might! It seems that playing fair isn't gonna work Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted April 28, 2008 Author Share Posted April 28, 2008 I was waiting for a post like this. I am sure there are more...I really am. More posts or more points. I don't think there's any real referee conspiracy. They're just human. Celtic specialise in hunting refs down and attacking their houses and families. It's only natural that they fear putting their families under such intimidation. I always said we had to win it by a bigger margin than they do to make up such points. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts