Cherster Perry 1977

The case is settled. Non story or wishful thinking.

An arrangement that I am more than comfortable with.

makes no difference to the casual reader.

Whether you like it or not, in print media, all of us.

Dave King has not intimated that he will throw his weight behind the board.

http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/rangers/u/king-says-yes-to-rangers-return.1381403029

There would be little point from his perspective and it would have been difficult.

I would say it is exteremely unlikely that he is behind any of the instituational investors.

I think timing is evertything and either is achievable if planned out correctly. We were in the wrong state for anything worthwhile to work while in admin and with the tax case.

Lets say no. But he wanted rid of the same bodies.

Will he be deemed a rebel if he wants certain board members removed?

Think before you type is the message here :pipe: :pipe:

I personally would like the comfort of a wealthy owner for a period until we establish a plan and strategy. Stability after uncertainty. In the longer term I would like to see a model that allowed the wealthy owner a vehicle to pass majority ownership to the fans.

Haha! ED thought he had me sussed, but has now seen the light.

I don't think Hart wanted anything other than a well run Rangers. Always thought he was caught in the middle.

I will buy more when the boradroom is transparent and above reproach. I hope there is a sensible credit purchase offer avaiable in order for the share issue to reach as many of the long suffering support as possible.

Good enough for the cnts. However, it's the legeslation I want fcked here. This just proves they are stepping it up.

Everyone!!

He was supposed to be in there as a canary. As long as he was there, everything was OK. However, when he left, it just brought further confusion.

The clean slate approach is pointless. Nothing really changes. Grievances need to be heard, accuations adressed or backed up, responsibility taken. A clean slate just papers over the cracks. And at the moment that would last about a week.

I couldn't open the link. I assume it's an official line and not just a random contribution (?)

"For example, why the growing trend among those who are pro-Minico in the boardroom wars to use the term “Sevco” when referring to the club?" I have never heard this from anyone calling themself a Rangers fan.

The problem is, by the time they get to court the damage is potentially already done.......loss of job etc

Fair bit of tail chasing on this thread.

Do you agree so far?