john meikle

This is spot-on. Nobody has all the facts, everybody's trying to find out the truth whatever way they can. Bomber's in yer face approach is one way. There are others, some maybe more eloquent, but nobody should doubt that Bomber's heart is in the right place. He's not gone about it in the way I would like to see, but at least he's having a go.

Liam McLeod ‏@BBCLiamMcLeod Charles Green's Sevco 5088 company is not currently permitted to inherit the name 'The #Rangers Football Club'. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/ 18509619

From twitter: Gregory Ioannidis ‏@LawTop20 With RFC ending, liabilities and sanctions [Court of Session, dual contracts etc] would also end. This is the main advantage of New Rangers. Gregory Ioannidis ‏@LawTop20 The 'transfer' of the OldCo's liabilities to the NewCo, would mean a serious violation of the separate corporate personality principle. Gregory Ioannidis ‏@LawTop20 @Paulmcc12 @evanjhenderson @mdkster Just to help: SPL may vote to apply sanctions to NewCo but it would be in violation of national law Maybe they've messed it up again....

Can't believe this. THEY need us more than anybody does.

Brilliant post. Let's get back to doing things the Rangers way. Fuck the glory hunters.

Oh yeah - that team was just starting to change. Alex Scott was a bit of hero to me, but Willie Henderson was just breaking through, two of the best right wingers ever. We were just about to add Billy Ritchie, John Greig, big Ronnie McKinnon. Happy days indeed.....

Absolutely brilliant - anyone tell me where this came from? Wish we could get a series about all these great players I grew up with Niven, Shearer Caldow, Davis, Patterson, Baxter, Scott, McMillan, Millar, Brand & Wilson - the first Rangers team I ever saw. A wee tear in my eye

Bang on mate. FIFA can't punish us, they can only take action against the SFA it seems.

Cheers for the answer mate

This is twistin my melon man.............. Somebody needs to straighten me out here. Greens investmen tis a loan, paid back by 2020 right? Ticketus money was a loan, used to cover the bank loan, and paid back by a percentage of the seaon ticket sales. What was up with that then? Couldn'y we have just payed them back instead of all the mentalness?

Does that mean that if the cva is turned down, the assets will go on sale to the highest bidder? I'm thinking TBK or others might want to put in an offer for the stadium, trademarks etc.

There's a whole thread on another forum about invading the pitch tonight

Can't argue with that