backup
-
Posts
8,482 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Downloads
Posts posted by backup
-
-
7 minutes ago, gersandy said:
There were some highly paid players during the advocaat era. A lot more than was made public.
Kanchelskis.
-
1 hour ago, rabc10000 said:
Was only asking a simple question, no idea how much it was and no getting into arguments over it. Genuinelu dont have a clue despite discussions with fellow Bears who continually state otherwise and as I pointed out didn't k ow what other thread to post in to ask.
Yes he is getting paid his contractual wage in full, we contribute a percentage of that.
-
-
-
1 minute ago, The Dude said:
Right but not every member of the SFA are under them.
The stuff you cited that was deleted only applies to school teams. Not teams of school age but football teams operated by eucational establishments. Nobody else. It's a total red herring and has absolutely no relevance to celtic, celtic BC or St. Pats
No, the law of the land applies to all not how associations decide they are to be administered, that is the remit of the courts.
Once you are fully comfortable with that very obvious analogy enlightenment shall follow, incidentally do you agree that celtic, (never mind anyone else for their cover up of abuse is the subject matter) should be prosecuted to the full extent of the criminal code ?
- VentyFour and Bobby Hume
-
2
-
Just now, Bad Robot said:
Yes they are the parent but the SSFA documents have nothing to do with anything in youth football only school football and yes they are low on child protection issues in the links below as ultimately the school are still responsible similar to school kids being taken to the swimming, there’s case law saying it’s the school who ultimately has the duty of care and supervision, and not the Lesuire centre and life guards if that makes sense. The councils have very strict child protection policies
I was referring to the sfa, as being irrelevant and unfit for purpose, it is a criminal matter 👍
-
2 minutes ago, The Dude said:
It could well have just been the City of Glasgow FA
Who are under the sfa, as all are.
-
2 minutes ago, Bad Robot said:
Yes under the SYFA abs not the SSFA
no the sfa, parent of all.
The Scottish FA is the governing body for football in Scotland.
-
5 minutes ago, Bad Robot said:
That’s a complete red herring as it’s to do with the sfa and schools and nothing to do with youth or professional football.
the sfa has unfortunately to do with all.
-
5 minutes ago, The Dude said:
Right, but he wasn't playing under the Scottish Schools FA. That relates to school teams/competitions.
All associations are under the sfa banner, specifically the league/assocciation celtic boys club (now st pats after £20K changed hands) are/were affiliated to.
-
Just now, The Dude said:
It wouldn't be relevant to celtic/celtic BC as neither compete under the SSFA.
Section 9 is/was about reporting abuse, Andrew was abused from schoolboy age.
-
Would be extremely unbecoming for this to turn into a point scoring thread, I am sure we all in our own different ways want to see different entity brought to the full force of criminal justice.
-
1 minute ago, The Dude said:
That's the Scottish Schools FA and it was removed because the SSFA moved to their own website.
Andrew Grays Mum challenged the sfa on the charmed life of section 9, so far she has not had the decency of a reply, new website or no new website.
- Malvern and Bobby Hume
-
2
-
30 minutes ago, The Dude said:
No they didn't. I've no idea where this myth appeared from.
https://www.scottishfa.co.uk/scottish-fa/football-governance/childrens-rights-wellbeing/for-clubs/
The reason they are continually being quoted is that they are the only body who has the power to issue sporting sanctions (unless it was to go to FIFA/UEFA although even then it would be referred back to Hampden first)
👍
-
22 minutes ago, The Dude said:
Again, nobody has said anything different. You're trying to prove your intelligence by incorrectly correcting a post.
Nobody has suggested that anyone other the COPFS are in control.
The sfa are irrelevant and not fit for purpose, they removed the need to report abuse from their rules, why the sfa are continually quoted is beyond me it is a criminal matter, is that easier 🤫
-
Just now, The Dude said:
You seem to have misread a very simple post.
CB had reference the punishments the SFA gave us in 2012. Those are the ones referenced. Any punishment issued by the Scottish FA would almost certainly be a civil matter unless celtic as a corporate entity was prosecuted.
Very simply this is a criminal matter, the sfa and the CoS have no jurisdiction, the Crown Office and the PF are custodians of jurisprudence in this matter.
-
2 minutes ago, The Dude said:
Nobody suggested any different.
The CoS is irrelevant in this matter.
-
2 minutes ago, The Dude said:
To the point there were found unlawful in the court of session.
The CoS is a civil court, these are criminal matters.
-
27 minutes ago, The Dude said:
An enquiry wouldnt have any power to punish celtic unless it was done under the auspices of the Scottish FA
A private prosecution if successful would, following on the sfa would then be duty bound as well as morally bound to act, failure by them to do so could also see them prosecuted for aiding and abetting a convicted party.
-
£74 million for the chelski dodgy keeper must be the biggest robbery in transfer history !
-
Far and away the ultimate book on a Rangers Captain and immortal legend.
-
Seen it said that it was jack's wife who posted the video, surely not!
-
Doubt he is going anywhere, been two tentative inquiries from Germany nothing more so far.
-
30 minutes ago, rabc10000 said:
See if u take away the summer breaks and 6 days avg between games then he really isn't a sick note😉😉
I just cannot understand it at all, his hearts days aff (monday club) are clearly marked, obviously apart from the sick note days with us he has cost an absolute fortune for little if any return, testimonial...he should be paying us...😉
If we lose Tav, Kent and Morelos...
in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
Posted
There is an obvious correlation if kent comes back on loan, no one is was willing to pay L’pool’s asking price.