coopscracker

Don't you start

Equally fucked in the head.

Dafuq you posting pics of ma wife for

He would be too busy burning a tri color or wanking into a union jack. Pretty sure you would have to give his PO a few weeks notice too.

Seemed like a bad shout then, not the kind of name we would have accepted but he has done well for killie

Jeez mate don't set yourself up like that.

10 dinar

Bravo indeed

He said staunch not stupid Give it 5 minutes and you would be blawing oot yer erse

Still more than any other cunt There.are.no.tanks.in.bagdad

its not unlikely that the first minister of scotland has the number of someone outwith the HMRC call centre is it? doesnt mean they will or are likely to listen. clearly the point is he tried.

only 2 of those parties would have influence with HMRC, Scottish government has no pull whatsoever with HMRC Tories and labour could have done something but didnt. I am glad you are getting the point i am trying to make though, and yes there are members in the snp who clearly dislike our club and what it stands for. there are dick heads in every walk of life.

Fixed that for you mate, no idea why you left everyone else out bar the snp .........

Fair enough mate, appreciate the reasoned response. Going by the logic currently being implied it would be the equivalent of the snp at the national level, PM, scottish secretory, shadow ministers etc etc. The point is that all we hear about (including from yourself) is how the snp never helped us, never hear about the tories or labour or others in a position of influence. You can see why it looks agenda driven.

genius

if the point you are arguing is that the ONLY people in a position to help were the snp then lets close this off now.

So just to get this right...its the non politicians who are being political and the politicians who are NOT being political. ok gotcha. Why is it that the SNP get accused of not wanting to help us during that time ( despite there being evidence they did) but no cunt mentions those who COULD have actually helped. It is of course a rhetorical question but would be interested in you point of view.

cant diagree with that too much however i think candeis is at fault too. There was no reason for him to pressure their keeper, if he had sat on brown the keeper would have punted it up and we could have had the chance to clear. He was clearly buzzing about scoring and was just trying to give his all. naive more than anything

love that it has went tits up for him, he thought he was bigger than us and our under 20's manager has scudded him twice. prick

wasnt just referring to you, but you still dont address the point. people seem to be able to absolve everyone who WERE in a position to do something of responsibility but not others, its almost asif its agenda driven....oh wait. the type of rocket who knows the queens english :) selective facts and figures....its not pertinent unless it affirms my view..... You wont be surprised that i am not surprised that you couldn't back up your argument, i mean its not as if you were trying to argue that you could identify "unidentifiable" spendi.... oh wait i mean its not as if you were arguing that you can make accurate statements on a balance sheet when revenue is "spent on your behalf" .... oh wait.... never EVER start your own business. As much as it turns our stomach its a reality that people in power need to "play nice" Our troops were over there serving our beloved queen, here she is meeting those who killed them.

what the fuck is wrong with people man, find the little bastards and put them in a labor camp for 10 years. sickening

"THAT borrowed debt, becomes ours on any indy" All of it or just a proportional share?, per capita share? Could you point me to where you are getting that info from, seems to me that it would be a negotiation but you seem to have other info so will be happy for you to point me to it.... "Now here is some homework to exercise your one brain cell. Work out all the wealth that Scotland creates and even factor in Barnet, then deduct what it costs to keep this shithole afloat on current infrastructure and overhead. ALL the figure are publicly available" Did you miss the part about "non-identifiable spending", here is a task for you Einstein.. Go and identify the "non-identifiable spending"... Will wait for your reply. When you are at it find a breakdown of what is "spent on behalf of Scotland"...will wait your reply. "Of course none of it takes into account all the additional revenue needed to fund new government departments, civil servants, new quangos, consular services all over the planet and so on." Seems that you are assuming the liability for shared debt but dont assume our share of joint assets....what a strange position to take. "Sadly logic and nationalists in the same sentence are just a contraction in terms, far less simple economics." 1) Go and identify the "non-identifiable spending" 2) find a breakdown of what is "spent on behalf of Scotland" 3) point me to your source for the allocation of debt in the event of Scottish independence. If you are able to provide these things and ultimately give credibility to your position then hats of to you....wont hold my breath though.

not going to answer the question?

sorry dude thought you were on about windass