rokcy 4 Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 A poster on rtc has claimed that much if not all of the correspondence regarding the alleged tax is on MIH letterheads, the strange thing is that the soapdodger who blogs rtc has all but confirmed that may well be the case and promptly waffled and ran for cover.Can any of our experts throw any light on the possible repercussions and benefits to ourselves if the documentation is indeed on MIH headed paper, taking into consideration that the employees of our club are employed by the club, murray stated quite clearly that we were and are a stand alone company with no cross funding or guarantees to MIH.Simple question why would monetary benefits to our players or staff be on the headed paper of a company which does not employ them.I am more confident by the day that we will win this tribunal, timmy will go into conspiracy meltdown nothing new there then. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 hmmmmm Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rokcy 4 Posted January 3, 2012 Author Share Posted January 3, 2012 hmmmmmAbout that name the one you keep dodging..... :lol: Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 its a mih scheme so it will be I expect. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiscoDavie 5 Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 You are better asking over at KerryFail Street as they know all that is going on with the Tax case, we are only Rangers fans after all, they are accountants!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rokcy 4 Posted January 3, 2012 Author Share Posted January 3, 2012 its a mih scheme so it will be I expect.So if it's a MIH scheme unless it is somehow construed as a joint scheme it has in reality very little if anything to do with RFC wouldn't you agree ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 About that name the one you keep dodging..... :lol:Or choosing not to give to you.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willger 14 Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 That site is full of zoomers, theyr'e on about turning it into a book or a film now. The more i read that site the more confident i'm becoming. One guy actually believes the authorities gifted us the last 2 titles to keep us in buisness. Their hatred towards us is all consuming and will be their downfall. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 So if it's a MIH scheme unless it is somehow construed as a joint scheme it has in reality very little if anything to do with RFC wouldn't you agree ?its our responsibility. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rokcy 4 Posted January 3, 2012 Author Share Posted January 3, 2012 Or choosing not to give to you.... You simply made it up as you always do. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 You simply made it up as you always do. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 You simply made it up as you always do. well lets see how it turns out...maybe you should stick to the filth site that blogs about our tax case for your information....that seems to suit you better Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rokcy 4 Posted January 3, 2012 Author Share Posted January 3, 2012 its our responsibility.Why if it's a MIH scheme as you say ? AJ opined it was something down to MIH.He said: "It is not a new issue."Tax issues are never clear cut, but all I can say is that we have taken a lot of legal advice on the issue."I do not think it should be a material concern for us in the longer term."It's something the Murray Group have been dealing with and taking care of." http://forum.rangersmedia.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=151401&view=findpost&p=1057964560 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregor Stevens Fan Club 42 Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Why if it's a MIH scheme as you say ? AJ opined it was something down to MIH.He said: "It is not a new issue."Tax issues are never clear cut, but all I can say is that we have taken a lot of legal advice on the issue."I do not think it should be a material concern for us in the longer term."It's something the Murray Group have been dealing with and taking care of." http://forum.rangersmedia.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=151401&view=findpost&p=1057964560You better tell Craig Whyte then - because he thinks it affects the club. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rokcy 4 Posted January 3, 2012 Author Share Posted January 3, 2012 You better tell Craig Whyte then - because he thinks it affects the club. The problem is we don't have a clue what our owner thinks. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rokcy 4 Posted January 3, 2012 Author Share Posted January 3, 2012 well lets see how it turns out...maybe you should stick to the filth site that blogs about our tax case for your information....that seems to suit you better About that name you seem a tad embarrassed and deflective, can't say I am in the least surprised since you spend most of your time on kiddyfiddlers street. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gillete 1,338 Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Anyone else not got a scooby about anything in this thread ?Means nothing to me Please explain in foundation english level please Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluepeter 5,627 Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Can you three (rokcy, GCL and gs) stop flirting and get a room please? If you want to discuss the tax case, go ahead. This other shite is interesting to nobody but yourselves. Cheers Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bunter 0 Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 you mean, "foundation level English" Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creampuff 22,628 Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 I'm pretty sure if the club weren't going to be liable for the tax case, Craig Whyte would know. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Why if it's a MIH scheme as you say ? AJ opined it was something down to MIH.He said: "It is not a new issue."Tax issues are never clear cut, but all I can say is that we have taken a lot of legal advice on the issue."I do not think it should be a material concern for us in the longer term."It's something the Murray Group have been dealing with and taking care of." http://forum.rangersmedia.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=151401&view=findpost&p=1057964560because our staff joined it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
linfield1690 4,249 Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Guy in the pub told me its settled Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeds_Bear 8,165 Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Double post . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeds_Bear 8,165 Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 A poster on rtc has claimed that much if not all of the correspondence regarding the alleged tax is on MIH letterheads, the strange thing is that the soapdodger who blogs rtc has all but confirmed that may well be the case and promptly waffled and ran for cover.Can any of our experts throw any light on the possible repercussions and benefits to ourselves if the documentation is indeed on MIH headed paper, taking into consideration that the employees of our club are employed by the club, murray stated quite clearly that we were and are a stand alone company with no cross funding or guarantees to MIH.Simple question why would monetary benefits to our players or staff be on the headed paper of a company which does not employ them.I am more confident by the day that we will win this tribunal, timmy will go into conspiracy meltdown nothing new there then.I doubt very much that the type of paper used will define this, I am sure it has already been looked at. I am quite confident (on no information what so ever) we will end up with a settlement figure of some kind or we will loose it. Or we will win it. Don't ask me how I know just a hunch. I am usually really good with these kind of things as well. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosesMcNeil 1,664 Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Guy in the pub told me its settled Boy at the local co-op checkout said the same thing.Too much of a coincidence for it not to be true Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.