Colonel Mustard 380 Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 The OP is right. Its not ok tae accept this big Lee love in just cos we won.I have to admit to feeling the same.My heart sank every time he got the ball, and with every sideways and backwards pass.It sank with every wee skip as he ran in to an opposition player to have the ball passed by him, and it sank with every awkward movement of his gait.When he blazed the ball into the Rangers end from a good position, and then had a fucking smile to himself, I wanted to make him marry my wife. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dalton 1,192 Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 I dont think today mattered that big lee got his call its when hes on the starting sheet that many bears worry about and has been an hinderance through his limitations .Mc Cullough under walter in old firm games in his selected role as it workedas he was able to kick people about in an holding role at the back.The only low point was big lee getting on but if edu was injured then that for once it made sense an ally sub. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneDavidCooper 2,505 Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 The OP is right. Its not ok tae accept this big Lee love in just cos we won.Not a single poster has praised Lee so its hardly a "love in".All we are saying is why pick on this issue after a good win?Miserable feckers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebooler 4,509 Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Not a single poster has praised Lee so its hardly a "love in".All we are saying is why pick on this issue after a good win?Miserable feckers. I never said any posters had praised him. I referred to his love in wae Ally. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HG5 11,446 Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Rangers 4 Hibernian 0Reasons to cry like a baby - there’s always someone to invent one even if it’s not needed at all.Lee found time in his wee cameo to set up 2 Hibs breaks, only bailed out by great work from Boca & Greegs, and smack a shot 25 yards wide.What more do you need to know? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OzGers 425 Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 am i right in saying jig was booed a few times for playing the barry ferguson, aka passing the ball backwards?In any case, up 3 nil, take your point, ally should have more confidence in youngsters and use that time as an opportunity to get them exposed.I for one never want to see jig play in our midfield again, and thankfully i think ally is starting to see that too Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWalterSmithLegend 206 Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Lee found time in his wee cameo to set up 2 Hibs breaks, only bailed out by great work from Boca & Greegs, and smack a shot 25 yards wide.What more do you need to know?He hates the truth that one. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HG5 11,446 Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Not a single poster has praised Lee so its hardly a "love in".All we are saying is why pick on this issue after a good win?Miserable feckers. HG5 saidMaybe just a wee bit of balance to the slightly bi-polar nature of the forum.Some real signs of life & hope today, but a fair bit of dross interspersed amongst some actual brilliance.Full backs still let too many balls across the face of the goal & a better team would've made our margin a bit less comfy today.Great to have some quality goals to cheer again (and one which was due reward for persistence) but there's still work to be done. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creampuff 22,628 Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 He's the only defensive mid we had.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HG5 11,446 Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 He's the only defensive mid we had..3 up v 10 men - might we have managed without a DM? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FUDGIE52 9 Posted January 28, 2012 Author Share Posted January 28, 2012 He's the only defensive mid we had..Lets be honest mate Rangers within the context of Scottish football don't need a defensive midfielder, we should be taking the game to every team outwith the tarriers. Lee McCulloch's legs have gone he can't do the job required when he is in there anymore, it is only my opinion but personally I would rather see McCoist giving some of the youth a go, you have got to bleed them into the team at some point and when you are 3-0 up with 15mins to go against 10 men against a team in disarray such as Hibs are then what better a time to do so, Walter Smith was exactly the same in these situations and it is something that really disillusions a lot of supporters. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
docspiderman 1,262 Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Ally just being charitable and wanted to even the numbers after Hibs went down to 10 men. It did work because even one of the worst spl teams I have seen started to look dangerous. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creampuff 22,628 Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 3 up v 10 men - might we have managed without a DM?Why change the shape that got us to that position? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creampuff 22,628 Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 Lets be honest mate Rangers within the context of Scottish football don't need a defensive midfielder, we should be taking the game to every team outwith the tarriers. Lee McCulloch's legs have gone he can't do the job required when he is in there anymore, it is only my opinion but personally I would rather see McCoist giving some of the youth a go, you have got to bleed them into the team at some point and when you are 3-0 up with 15mins to go against 10 men against a team in disarray such as Hibs are then what better a time to do so, Walter Smith was exactly the same in these situations and it is something that really disillusions a lot of supporters.Every team needs a more defensive minded midfielder. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel Mustard 380 Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 Why change the shape that got us to that position?Because it's a fucking horrible shape in the first place. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hendoguy 11 Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 Still here chapsWE SHALL NOTWEE SHALL NOT BE MOVED!!!!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneDavidCooper 2,505 Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 Still here chapsWE SHALL NOTWEE SHALL NOT BE MOVED!!!!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel Mustard 380 Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 Every team needs a more defensive minded midfielder.No. Every team needs a player who can win the ball in the middle of the park. It's not the same thing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel Mustard 380 Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 Still here chapsWE SHALL NOTWEE SHALL NOT BE MOVED!!!!!!Hi altar boy. Tomorrow's rape day at the chapel for you.Big Jock sucking cocks in hell with Desmond White must be a disappointment to you.What kind of horrible, bawfaced cunt doesn't report child rape? Worse than the vatican nazi, IMO. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creampuff 22,628 Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 No. Every team needs a player who can win the ball in the middle of the park. It's not the same thing.Every midfield needs a player sitting further back in order to break up play and be a "starting again point" for moves forward that aren't working. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel Mustard 380 Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 Every midfield needs a player sitting further back in order to break up play and be a "starting again point" for moves forward that aren't working.No they don't. Especially not Rangers in the SPL.Who told you that? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HG5 11,446 Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 Why change the shape that got us to that position?Thought Mo was nearer the front a lot of the time, so kinda messing with that shape, anyway.I'm sure Sasa would've coped with a move in one Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creampuff 22,628 Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 No they don't. Especially not Rangers in the SPL.Who told you that?Cool, we'll just play with a midfield of 4 attacking players then? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creampuff 22,628 Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 Thought Mo was nearer the front a lot of the time, so kinda messing with that shape, anyway.I'm sure Sasa would've coped with a move in oneIt's not McCulloch's ability I'm defending mate, it's more McCoist's thinking in bringing him on. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HG5 11,446 Posted January 29, 2012 Share Posted January 29, 2012 It's not McCulloch's ability I'm defending mate, it's more McCoist's thinking in bringing him on.Sorry Alan, see where you're coming from In fairness to Ally, if ever there was a time to get him a few minutes match sharpness (just in case . ??) it was then, but once I saw the swap being made, couldn't help but think 'thank god we got that third goal! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.