belter 1 Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 If lbg were still in charge we would have sold davis,mcgregor,whittaker and jelavic during the summer.This is a given we would have reduced our debt from 18 million to around 6 million ,this is assuming that we would have raised 12 millon from the accumulated sales of the players mentioned.Wages would have reduced by approximately 35k a week .Players brought in would have been loan signings and out of contract players but debt and running costs would have been reduced.Whyte in charge has resulted in known debt rising due to wages increased extra transfer fees.We have also had the problem of various companies taking us to court to get monies owed ect.In a nutshell the hmrc case was going to be there whoever was in charge but the problems with other court cases ,cashflow problems are at whytes doorstep.I have said in previos posts we must be careful what we wish for. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creampuff 22,628 Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 We would have raised far more than 12 Would have been closer to 18-20.We'd still be fucked though. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVB 2,560 Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 I dont understand........are we being positive or negative today?Its all very confusing in here sometimes. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Thing is these players have been at the club during that time , yet no bids made for them during those dark days.So what's to say anyone wants them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 This Whyte v Murray shite is just pathetic. 'This owner is shite but your owner was worse' doesn't achieve the current objective: getting the REAL answers that are needed from the current incumbent. It's one contradiction after another. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
belter 1 Posted February 1, 2012 Author Share Posted February 1, 2012 My post was stating some facts would we rather have a team who would probably still be in a reasonable position in terms of the spl due to the state of the scottish game or the circus we have now under whytes stewardship. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.df745cc91b83abab0590131961ba2774.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.