dan_ger 1,454 Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 The real question is:Can Whyte lose all his control if AJ gets his wayCan Ticketus then pursue him for the repayments on loaned season ticket moneyYes, as far as we all know Ticketus have security over CW assets.CW has already lost control of the club. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLawMan 6,240 Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 The real question is:Can Whyte lose all his control if AJ gets his wayCan Ticketus then pursue him for the repayments on loaned season ticket moneyYes and probably yes. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.T.G 10,773 Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 Yes, as far as we all know Ticketus have security over CW assets.CW has already lost control of the club.I mean lose his shares ie get him to fuck Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 Which means we get off free from Whyte and Ticketus?if he's not a secured creditor perhaps. buy only if we are liquidated. more likely whyte will just get a share like everyone. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan_ger 1,454 Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 I mean lose his shares ie get him to fuckNot sure, that would probably involve a very long winded court case. Unless he gave them up out of embarrassment. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.T.G 10,773 Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 if he's not a secured creditor perhaps. buy only if we are liquidated. more likely whyte will just get a share like everyone.He really is a cunt Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 He really is a cunthe really really is. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StudsLonniegan 9 Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 not quite true he first talked about it in April 2011 but provision is made in the half year figures to 31.12.10.Very true, the figures were delayed and the small tax bill was an addendum, what's up you not like the robber baron's definitive figure as stated to the press of £36.6 million without additions, or do you think he just invented that and thought it not important enough to be a liability possible or otherwise noted in the accounts. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
airdrieloyal1 6 Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 Go home Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 Very true, the figures were delayed and the small tax bill was an addendum, what's up you not like the robber baron's definitive figure as stated to the press of £36.6 million without additions, or do you think he just invented that and thought it not important enough to be a liability possible or otherwise noted in the accounts. I'm sure the auditor got it right. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StudsLonniegan 9 Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 I'm sure the auditor got it right.Got what right ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 Got what right ?the audit. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StudsLonniegan 9 Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 the audit.They didn't know about it allegedly or if they did they failed to flag it up either way not a clever move signing off incomplete accounts, aj waffling that it was an MIH problem, bit of a porky there aj or was it just incompetence or being so far out of murray's loop that you were dizzy. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 They didn't know about it allegedly or if they did they failed to flag it up either way not a clever move signing off incomplete accounts, aj waffling that it was an MIH problem, bit of a porky there aj or was it just incompetence or being so far out of murray's loop that you were dizzy. I doubt they are worried. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StudsLonniegan 9 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 I doubt they are worried.Probably the doubt that is worrying them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.