Frankie

We are all entitled to answer points if and when we can - or indeed, if and when we want to. Some people are not worth trying to converse with on here so I don't blame Chris for ignoring some stuff. Unfortunately, that may mean he misses the more genuine folk.
Has Chris' reaction been perfect. No, it's not but given the utter nonsense he's subjected to from people, it's not a surprise he responds in kind occasionally. That's unhelpful so I think everyone should rethink their style in that regard. But it won't happen because for some, personality issues have overtaken every other consideration.

I've never seen anyone (from Edgar, to Macmillan, to Kerr and more) say they're speaking for everyone. That would be ludicrous and untrue.
All these people are doing is, when asked, giving their opinion - usually on behalf of those they represent - to give a flavour of what the Rangers support is thinking. It may be reflective of the majority, it may not; but if anyone has serious opposition to these people and/or organisations, it's more constructive to offer an alternative.

Careful, that will get you outed on Twitter for sleeping with the enemy...
Seriously, I've had some interaction with her on Twitter and like most journos on there she's a bit selective in what she answers to. She also struggles to defend her opinion sometimes.
Does that mean she's a Rangers hater? Maybe not but she works for BBC Scotland so that's good enough for me in terms of someone I won't be trusting any time soon.

As I touched on earlier (and on Twitter yesterday) it's unfair for people to generalise about whole forums because of the actions of a few.
Every forum has its trolls, interlopers and fruitcakes. And on a forum as large and as intense as RM, I don't envy those attempting to moderate it. However, the rules are clear and BluePeter has had to go to extraordinary lengths recently to try and curb the unreasonable behaviour we've seen lately.
I think we all need to examine our contribution in that sense. The rules are there for everyone.

We are all entitled to answer points if and when we can - or indeed, if and when we want to. Some people are not worth trying to converse with on here so I don't blame Chris for ignoring some stuff. Unfortunately, that may mean he misses the more genuine folk.
Has Chris' reaction been perfect. No, it's not but given the utter nonsense he's subjected to from people, it's not a surprise he responds in kind occasionally. That's unhelpful so I think everyone should rethink their style in that regard. But it won't happen because for some, personality issues have overtaken every other consideration.

We are all entitled to answer points if and when we can - or indeed, if and when we want to. Some people are not worth trying to converse with on here so I don't blame Chris for ignoring some stuff. Unfortunately, that may mean he misses the more genuine folk.
Has Chris' reaction been perfect. No, it's not but given the utter nonsense he's subjected to from people, it's not a surprise he responds in kind occasionally. That's unhelpful so I think everyone should rethink their style in that regard. But it won't happen because for some, personality issues have overtaken every other consideration.

I'm genuinely at a loss for words.

I'm genuinely at a loss for words.

I'm genuinely at a loss for words.

I'm genuinely at a loss for words.

I think the chances of Imran taking legal action are pretty minimal to be honest. If he was going to do so, he'd have done so in the intervening three weeks since he sent the original letter - especially since Rangers have apparently dismissed his claim. As with his previous attempts at getting a pay off, this is arguably all about trying to make some more money out of the club. How much did he receive for organising club loans in the past again?
As for Ahmad being a 'money-machine' and the rest of the McMurdo article, I'll let others decide on the quality of the piece.

Some people have literally backed themselves into a corner by their support of Green and Ahmad. If it means using Celtic fans to make their point or willing legal action on bears shining a light on club directors leaking club info, so be it it seems...

I'm perfectly rational.
I'm comfortable that no laws were broken by Chris or TRS. I also doubt any legal action will go ahead.

It looks to me like the death throes of people who discredit themselves more each week.
It's no wonder McCollco don't say anything when Ahmad and Green say it all.

I'm genuinely at a loss for words.

Ahmad is looking for a pay-out. It is as simple as that. And, unless Chris Graham is loaded, he is not going to waste his money going after him.

I'm genuinely at a loss for words.

1. He has not driven the share price down.
2. He has actually said very little. Hardly a war of words.
3. He is a shareholder as am I. He is under no more obligation than me to invest more money.
4. His money isn't needed right now. This is a battle for shareholder votes not further investment.
5. He is not dictating the composition of the future Board. He is making a proposal which will go to a vote of the shareholders.

It looks to me like the death throes of people who discredit themselves more each week.
It's no wonder McCollco don't say anything when Ahmad and Green say it all.

I'm genuinely at a loss for words.

I'm genuinely at a loss for words.

I'm genuinely at a loss for words.

I'm genuinely at a loss for words.

Nope, no further info I'm afraid.
I think they'll have to announce the people behind the deal to the LSE by close of business today though.

It's debatable whether or not (and what portion) of season ticket income was included in the ca£10m Stockbridge mentioned.
He seemed to be very vague on the make-up of the money we have at the bank. Clearly the financials will help but it's just more uncertainty in the meantime.