TheFarmer

You didn't read my post did you? I said we are the only club to have done it!

No chance any team will ever manage our 100% win record again IMO. Even if Barca got relegated they would draw at least one. 25-1 is shite odds

So the vast majority of RM users now want Green out, what a welcome change from a week ago.

Membership scheme won't work unless the membership has a controlling stake in the club like the continental versions. Liverpool & Man United have membership schemes, but they are useless without a owning the club, all you get is ticket priority a membership card and some discounted merchandise.

Might do this for the EGM only if I can't make it. Cheers for the heads up OP.

We already held the rights to the name and brand of Rangers Football Club. It only allowed us to change the name of the company. We could have continued to operate the company as Sevco Scotland Ltd or anything else for that matter, while still playing a football team registered with the SFL and SFA as Rangers FC.

Sevco Scotland wasn't renamed 'to Rangers'. Sevco Scotland Ltd was renamed to The Rangers Football Club Ltd.

The shade of blue changes slightly ever year I have noticed. It would be last seasons shade every year if I was in charge!

Knows the lower leagues inside out - check Rangers man - check Experience of negotiating commercial football deals - check At the right price would be a good acquisition.

The fact that Charles Greenhas to 'agree to tell the truth' in court says it all really.

No. We have three starting 11's that would win this league. The first one would romp it. The second one would comfortably win it. The third one would win it with a game to spare.

Brilliant reason not to do it. You've sold me.

Personally I think the Linfield murals look brilliant.

I would love Rangers to organise a big mural on the side of the block of terraced houses on Copland Road. Big RFC scroll crest, or similar, would be good.

I think this is just speculation on Frankie's part that DK would underwrite a share issue, based on today's papers? It would be a good outcome though, capital investment is obviously drastically needed.

I really liked him whenever he came on. Was delighted when he got a new deal. We have 3 players for every position at the moment so we need to move at least some of them on, although he wouldn't be my first choice.

Contract was terminated according to the official site

Current shareholders would have a pre-emptive right to buy shares to stop their percentage share of the company diluting. New shares are usually valued at slightly below the current market price. It is generally up to the current board of directors to arrange a share issue, although there can be bylaws written into a company to limit the amount of share issues allowed (if any) A share issue may be underwritten, although this isn't necessary unless the company need an investment of a specific amount. They can get someone (usually a current major shareholder, but can be anyone else) to underwrite the share issue. Hope that helps.

Exactly, Most of us wont buy papers so would never have seen something like this unless it was posted on here (cheers OP)

^ WTF

The difference between Dave King and the other Rangers men you refer to is that he HAS 'put up' in the past (on a large scale).

The difference between Dave King and the other Rangers men you refer to is that he HAS 'put up' in the past (on a large scale).

You are correct. Your share in the company would be diluted, but in essence would be worth the same due to the whole company getting a cash injection. Happened numerous times under David Murray's 'stewardship'.

Rangers Swifts No Surrender

He has bought up a "small number of shares" according to the press