UKIP BEAR

No,i understand that mate.But there was plenty on here,handing out all sorts of nasty abuse to the req's for speaking to certain media outlets. Now i trust Mr.Wallace but that doesn't mean we should not be critical of him or that we do not keep a close eye on the board. Just seems to me that some are being somewhat 2 faced about it.

I agree.But what is really annoying me is that it seems to be ok for the present board to talk to Rangers haters. Not one iota of criticism from anyone on here. The silence is deafening.

And our ceo gives him an interview. ffs,you couldn't make it up.

Agree 100%.If he thinks we need investment,then invest. The agm is over,wallace must be given a chance to sort out the mess.

Irrelevant?Wasn't irrelevant a few weeks ago. Anyone who spoke to a Rangers hater was slaughtered. Why is nobody saying a word on Wallace giving an interview to English? And they know who they are.

Lack of comment says it all.

aye.Some people are more equal than others.

Seeing as most of the people commenting on this thread were some of the most fervent supporters of the board and some of the most bitter opponents of the req's. Can anyone please tell me why Mr.Wallace isn't being attacked from all angles for giving an interview to Rangers hater Tom English? As some of you may know,i supported the req's but i am willing to give the board a chance to do the job they said they would. If the req's would have given English an interview this forum would have went into meltdown. Personally,i support Mr.Wallace and i think he looks the part,but i think there may be some on here who should,by following their own logic,be slaughtering Mr.Wallace.

I was being a bit sarcastic actually mate.What i am getting at is,if certain other people who were trying to get onto the board had given an interview to that bastard English this forum would have gone into meltdown. But hey ho,we move on. Onwards and upwards. Think id better shut it,im doing what ive been moaning to others about. ie. Looking backwards.

Imagine speaking to one of the enemies of our club. Tut tut.

The only slight sticking point i have is that,he was asked if ally gets it(financial situation)and he said he believes he does. Then the squad book into a plush hotel instead of driving a hour and a half up the road in a luxury coach. Pissing our money down a stank imo.

We're being taken for mugs. We pay,they take.

While Mr.Stockbridge remains at Rangers there will be dissatisfaction from large parts of the support.I cannot believe that he is still in his job. Craig Mather was a disaster and had to go. BS must go too.

Good luck Andy. Go on and prove us wrong.

Yes our player's are entitled to refuse a 15% wage cut.(legally) But how many of them could look at themselves in the mirror and say that their performances have merited the money they are on? I said this last year and i'll say it again,i really don't think i'd like alot of our players. It's all me, me,me. What about the club? Play for the jersey? Don't make me laugh. If i could give the club my season ticket money in another way next season i would. Im sick of watching this bunch of selfish,greedy individuals. They don't deserve our loyalty.

ffs you could get a job as a spin doctor for a political party.

If i played for Rangers,i would say yes ok.But then again,i love Rangers. Too many of the cunts that pull that famous blue jersey on obviously don't.

Dublin in march for st.patrick's day.Enjoy yourself. FFS. Aaaaaaaaaggggghhhhh!

Aye you're right.Protestant history rather than roots is probably a better description.

If you'd have read an earlier post of mine,you'd have seen that i said,i have no problem with the ordinary Irish people.But i do have a problem with the Irish state and their flag.

You trying to say that you can't have protestant roots without being a sectarian club?

You're well named mate.

Not sectarian-Protestant.

terrorism is different from war

Cheers mate.