Didn’t see the interview. But, it’s more about his contribution as a leader on the pitch than what he says in a post-match interview for me. He is not, and never has been a leader.
I’ve never understood this. Any player worth his salt could have a go at a free kick and strike a dead ball, and if you can’t take a throw in, then your the wrong sport.
There is someone of that ilk at the Sheep and Livingston (or at least there was). I fail to see why they would be any worse than what we’ve bought lately - and would have been a lot cheaper.
The MF 3 will be arguing over who goes back in between the back 4 to pick up the ball and spray an endless number of unnecessary passes left to right and back again. They offer very little going forward.
Neil Banfield:
”As long as you're working to a format that you know is going to bring success - and I think that's what we're doing”
Can anyone see this format? What is it?
What’s worrying, is that he surely must have identified the system he wanted to play before we brought players in to fit into it. I’m still unsure if he actually did either of those things.
Good for you mate. Ultimately, we are just numbers to them. As long as they get sufficient numbers to turn a profit they won’t bother either way.
I’m out on this occasion though.