Jump to content

Gazza2258

First Team
  • Posts

    1,085
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Gazza2258

  1. 2 hours ago, Robmc1 said:

    Especially since McInness actually got sent off for taking umbrage with it. I honestly believe it was more to do with the horsing his team got that night he spat the dummy,  the singing deflector was laid at his feet by a reporter which he gratefully clasped on to...

    100%.  Was blatantly obvious after what had happened just a few days before and almost fuck all was said about it.  I also think he kept quiet about them that week, because he wanted to keep that avenue open to him.

  2. I think everyone who sings the songs we are supposedly not supposed to sing, is guilty in this instance.  But the UB can't keep claiming that it is them, and solely them that bring any and all atmosphere to Ibrox, then take a huff when we get sanctions against us.  They DO bring the atmosphere to home games, they DO stop it being a library, but they also DO dictate almost 100% what songs are sung. 

    I think generally they are a good thing, I get annoyed when a song starts outwith them but they stick to their hym sheet and often do their own thing regardless of what is happening elsewhere song wise.

    But the bottom line is, we have been warned, we've now been punished, and the punishments will get worse if it doesn't stop . There is no getting away from that regardless of what WE think can and can't be sung.  We need to either change some of our songs, or change some of the words in said songs.  I would go with the latter.  

    I do disagree with BF1 being shut for the game.  It should have been a total ballot as to what 3000 seats / sections were closed, and if BF1 was picked out, so be it.  But that obviously didn't happen.

  3. 8 minutes ago, Soldier blue said:

    I have the same concerns as the OP.  More worrying for me was the second half against Blackburn when they put in a high press and our CBs were caught out numerous times and we struggled to shift the ball forward - I don’t doubt other teams will adopt the same tactic this season.

    They were also caught a few times last night.  Their forward was through on goal in one chance and should of made it 2-1.  I'm all for patience but it should still be with total concentration.  I thought we looked a bit lazy at the back last night towards the end.

  4. 41 minutes ago, CoatbridgeBear said:

    How is this our clubs fault?😂 as long as they can justify it ie safety etc then there’s fuckall we can do.

    That's not strictly true.  We could have all this stop overnight, if we didn't go to the games.  I know it is not going to happen any time soon, but our support could have it stopped right away, if we wanted to.

  5. 4 minutes ago, eskbankloyal said:

    Can accept that he hasn't played much football so will be rusty but he was absolutely woeful yesterday. Positional sense was non-existent. Really want him to succeed but looking less likely every time he steps on the park

    Agree, I'm the same as you.  I wouldn't mind keeping him and try to make it work, but would offload if a decent offer came in.

  6. 13 hours ago, Lord Lockin said:

    Gerrards biggest mistake of the season playing Worrall instead of Katic 

    Possibly/probably.  Could it not have been something in the agreement that dictated Worrall play xx games?  I can't believe that he was backed purely on his performances vs Katic, for so long.

  7. 38 minutes ago, CF2 WINNIE said:

    I got allocated a ticket and will go but my opinion was if Rangers backed the RSCs on it I wouldn’t have gone we asked and members wanted to go so will be taking tickets, definitely understand why some aren’t 

    We also asked and said no, fed it back, fuck all happened, 1 person so far asked for a ticket in club chat.

  8. 9 hours ago, LilyTheOrange said:

    Imagine an opposition club looking after their own fans?That's disgusting isn't it?They give us more tix than most  even with one stand (4,500?) . And of course ForeverAndEver you do know that Lewis will come home soon?

    Imagine being a football fan and you can’t get a ticket to see your team in a half empty ground. That’s disgusting isn’t it? 

     

    Pissed off with the club for not backing the RSCs on this one. Farce of a board. 

  9. 12 minutes ago, Courtyard Bear said:

    Aye mate, makes no difference to the total price though. 

    I need to speak to them again.  I tried to pay by 4 months online, but its not an option, and both my STs were £492 at check out.

    Phoned up to renew, paid by 4-month and they are charging £133 a month, so both are costing me £532 now.

  10. 11 minutes ago, ForeverAndEver said:

    No there wasn’t. That’s a lie, it was silent as fuck, and I sit in BF

    It wasn't silent as fuck, that is def a lie, there was def singing. Lets agree to disagree and move on to something that is important, like the football team.

  11. 35 minutes ago, ForeverAndEver said:

    Lot of shite that mate.

    Kilmarnock was dreadful, and for the most part they are the only ones that sing.

    So how comes I genuinely didn't notice that they were protesting the first night the toys went oot the pram?  Until the boy behind me mentioned it towards the end of the game?  I'm only in GF1, no that far away.  There was the same amount of singing that night as there normally is, albeit not enough.

  12. 16 minutes ago, Tiger Shaw said:

    The point I’m making is that the people slating the UB for their silent protest are the actual reason we need a singing section in the first place because they can’t be arsed to get up and vocally back the team. It’s a wee bit hypocritical mate. 

    This is not the case.  Yes, the atmosphere is generally shite, but they aren't the only ones that sing, thats a fallacy.  The first game they protested, I never even realised they were until near the end of the game because the Blue Order started most of the songs that game.  The atmosphere was the same from where i sit.

  13. 2 minutes ago, ForeverAndEver said:

    I’ve worded it wrongly I think.

    Obviously not getting safe standing and being told they’re getting BF3 but not getting it is, the silent protests will be to show how shite Ibrox is, and they’re aren’t wrong.

    I get that - I just think that even though those two main issues are important, in regards to Rangers doing well in each and every game we play, ie the big scheme of things, they really aren't that important.

  14. 1 minute ago, Jeffrey said:

    Kinda changed my mind about this a bit. Not really having a go at them and I agree 100% with them wanting safe standing and I agree there should be protests if that's what's required but this wasn't the night

    Seems to have backfired as haven't seen many people supporting what they did

    Should have sung for 90 minutes but still done the throwing onto the park imo

    I agree.  I said before that I think most would back them as their current goals are for the benefit of absolutely everyone that attends games, and the team on the pitch.  That can't be denied. 

    They just need to be more mature about it and pick their moments better - support will be there if they do.

×
×
  • Create New...