ricksen_da_best 2,034 Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 were we run any better when murray stepped down? :pipeguy: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davy 68 Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 He was a fall guy who was brought in when we had our massive debt.Another fly move by Saint David. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSuedeSambas 53,782 Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 Not too sure myself but I think it may have benn FISH that said something along the lines of McClelland was only put in charge by SDM so SDM didn't have to take the flack about how bad things had become financially. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davy 68 Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 Not too sure myself but I think it may have benn FISH that said something along the lines of McClelland was only put in charge by SDM so SDM didn't have to take the flack about how bad things had become financially.Thats exactly why he was brought in Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSuedeSambas 53,782 Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 Thought so :Animation44: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
docspiderman 1,228 Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 Bowed down to everything the small time chairmen of clubs like Dunfermline wanted.Certainly did not defend the club and lowered our status. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricksen_da_best 2,034 Posted April 7, 2007 Author Share Posted April 7, 2007 was quite a strange move... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSuedeSambas 53,782 Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 Not really as it protected SDM's reputation! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nvager 498 Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 SDM seems as slippery as THEFISH!!! Is that possible?Are they one and the same?????Who knows? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
THEFISH 0 Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 SDM seems as slippery as THEFISH!!! Is that possible?Are they one and the same?????Who knows?There is a big difference between me and him, Im concerned about the long term future of RFC, he is not !If any RFC supporter thinks he has then they are way out of touch :pipeguy: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nvager 498 Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 SDM seems as slippery as THEFISH!!! Is that possible?Are they one and the same?????Who knows?There is a big difference between me and him, Im concerned about the long term future of RFC, he is not !If any RFC supporter thinks he has then they are way out of touch :pipeguy:Great Stuff! I just PUSHED YOUR BUTTON!! Hook, line and sinker!!ha ha !!Good on you Buddy! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 9 Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 McLelland was put in place to 'financially stabilise' us, but he will be best remembered for overseeing the era of the Capuchos, Manieros and Ostenstads.He doesn't have a clue about football, he's a businessman - and he was used to try to manage us at a tight time.Then SDM comes in like a knight in shining armour to take over again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
THEFISH 0 Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 SDM seems as slippery as THEFISH!!! Is that possible?Are they one and the same?????Who knows?There is a big difference between me and him, Im concerned about the long term future of RFC, he is not !If any RFC supporter thinks he has then they are way out of touch :pipeguy: Great Stuff! I just PUSHED YOUR BUTTON!! Hook, line and sinker!!ha ha !!Good on you Buddy!Away an lie in yer pesh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albahighlander 0 Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 SDM seems as slippery as THEFISH!!! Is that possible?Are they one and the same?????Who knows?There is a big difference between me and him, Im concerned about the long term future of RFC, he is not !If any RFC supporter thinks he has then they are way out of touch :pipeguy:The other difference being that you never have to provide any answers or solutions. It's always easier to criticise than to be constructive Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 Fish, I must ask.You say your interested in the long term future of RFC, but at the same time say you wouldn't be happy unless Murray pumped £20million+ a season into the team.We all know both can't happen, so what would your solution be? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts