craigyrfc11 24 Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 Agree i thought the tactics looked negative from off,didnt see game so cant really comment did ally do anything change it during game what did he try. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulRFC1 115 Posted July 26, 2011 Author Share Posted July 26, 2011 I see no possible way we can overturn this.Needing 2 goals in Sweden while they can sit in and counter attack us.Lets see what Ally does, going out against Malmo is worse than Kaunas. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulRFC1 115 Posted July 26, 2011 Author Share Posted July 26, 2011 Agree i thought the tactics looked negative from off,didnt see game so cant really comment did ally do anything change it during game what did he try.He did nothing.We needed something in there badly, why not bring on Wylde for Edu/McCulloch and play him on the left and then play Ortiz on the right with Davis in the middle and attack them ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaryMc 2,394 Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 AND HE IS SHITE AT DIVING,FKN EMBARASSING.THANKS FOR THAT!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nachothelegend 1,932 Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 Whittekar is never a full back cant defend and was skinned evrrytime by thier link up play on the left. Just like unirea he is ok going fward in right mid 5at the back shocking tactics this allows teams the onus and they then run at us. Clugger and edu will never work and to stick davis on the right just issolates him and he is our best midfielder. Moved in the middle 2nd half and was mich better i am afraid the whole balance of this team is wrong and lots of players out of position. Thank god we have a brilliant keeper.Poor tactics from tje team. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,548 Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 Got it all wrong, from starting with 5 at the back. I mean why the fuck be such a shitebag against such awful opposition ?we didnt start 5 at the back, wallace was a left mid, and we played 4-4-2/4-5-1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebestest 2,145 Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 We should have beat this team playing 3-3-1. It's the players fault.Ally, I sympathise. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulRFC1 115 Posted July 26, 2011 Author Share Posted July 26, 2011 we didnt start 5 at the back, wallace was a left mid, and we played 4-4-2/4-5-1No we never.It was definetly 5 at the back.I would have been happy with 4-5-1/4-3-3. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSuedeSambas 53,792 Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 Defended the team selection before the game, but that was dire, dire stuff. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fourfourtwo 1,960 Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 dire Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulRFC1 115 Posted July 26, 2011 Author Share Posted July 26, 2011 Defended the team selection before the game, but that was dire, dire stuff.As did I.We never set out 4-3-3/4-5-1 the way I thought we would tho.Pathetic. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.