Zonal Marking

[dougie76 15,359]

On 23/04/2017 at 7:22 PM, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

Thought it looked awful at the game. The highlights there showed it to be worse. 

At least 4 free headers, we got lucky they never took advantage.

It's not a good idea in the slightest.

Stops cunts taking responsibility so the players will enjoy it?

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,819]

3 hours ago, the_r_sole said:

that's the issue, we don't have many that can compete if the opposition have big players, so if they are in a zone rather than trailing a big fucker around, they can attack the ball no matter which one of their players it's aimed for - the reality is we don't have anyone commanding enough, but we've known that since ally's days.

If the opposition have three big players and we man mark them, all they have to do is drag our big guys out of where the ball is going and they've got their other tall players being marked by lightweights

If the 3 of the cunts are running unhindered from the penalty spot to the 6 yard box to attack the ball against our one in that 'zone' we're fucked.

If we man mark at the penalty spot and block, barge, hold etc we've got a chance of stopping them attacking a ball.

Their big centre half and forwards aren't interested in dragging anyone anywhere.

[STEPPS BOY 74,232]

Zones dont score goals..

Players do though.

 

An absolute shambles of a tactic.