Yes, that was my understanding. It's a bit worrying though; i think they understand that this isn't just a normal administration, and all eyes are on the process and the outcome. I assume the best outcome for the creditors is the bidder with the biggest wad, but that may not be the best outcome for Rangers. If they do take a broader view, then who do they take advice form as they are not really qualified to make decisions on running a football club - though they couldn't do any worse than us in the last decade or more i suppose. Despite all the troubles we've endured, i still retain ambition...i want us to grow, be successful, do well in Europe, and dominate the scum; i don't want us to become an over-cautious, under ambitious, middle of the road kinda club. We are Rangers after all! I guess that means i want the investor with the big bucks, business acumen, and ambition rather than the bean-counters with limited resources and a rolling 5 year plan.