NessFTW

Absolutely brilliant header against a world class defender. Best headerer of all our strikers?

Was planning to head down directly before the match and get tickets, about 6.45 probably. Early enough you think?

Ah I see, so as long as the finances are sorted out first then they can take time to select a buyer and they will foot the bill. Gotcha.

What financial services company do you know that works on tic?

Ok so if the purchase is completed then the buyer provides the funds for the CVA. But you can't tell me that the prospective bidders are paying the administrators just now surely. They must be getting paid by Rangers; unless they work on tic So assuming that the administrators are getting paid out of Rangers bank account at the moment (how else would they), what happens if we run out of cash before the sale is completed? Start liquidating assets? Ok I am probably getting ahead of myself here and all this is just conjecture but the point is, I don't think we should just sit back and let Duff and Phelps have a free reign considering who they were appointed by. Oh and to the guy who said it wouldn't matter how long we stayed in administration for, sorry pal that's rubbish. If a business runs out of cash before they are able to exit from administration then that's game over. Well, for us it's liquidation and a newco but you get the point.

Precisely, the longer this process continues, the more Duff and Phelps benefit, the more the creditors will lose out. This may be an obvious one, but this 'kitty' I keep hearing about, I assume this is just the spare cash that Rangers currently have sitting in the bank? Any idea how much? Can't be a vast sum surely. As I said previously I'm more than happy for the administrators to be scrutized; after all, they were appointed by Craig Whyte

I'm not so keen on this weeks or months thing, seems awful ambiguous. Financial services companies are notorious for sucking as much money as they can from their clients and administration is a notoriously expensive process. I think we should be putting pressure on Duff and Phelps tbh. At the end of the day they have no affiliation to the club and probably could not give two shits if our club went down the drain, as long as they're racking up a huge bill in the process.

Question, do we have sell on clause?

Is this going to be played a Ibrox then? Could be a future anthem

Exactly

Couple of good articles there, refreshing to hear a couple of people let rip at them for a change

I think it's brilliant

As far as I was aware, Whyte got the ticketus money using his own assets as security against the loan. But...does that not mean that we technically haven't sold any season tickets to ticketus Anyone care to try and explain

Loved when they were all talking about the reasons to buy Rangers. Hopefully the Sheikh was listening

Of course, yes!

*Away to read first thread*

Agreed, top piece of refereeing and I hope he gets the total support of his colleagues if he is challenged on this.

That's about as low as you can go. Don't want to read shite like that anywhere. Disgusting.

I would definitely give him till at least next January if the club normalises itself and is able to rebuild in the summer. If anyone deserves it it's him Even then I would only consider a managerial change if we were already miles behind Celtic, otherwise he'd get till the end of the season for sure. Barring disaster, Ally deserves a full normal season in charge before he is judged.

What accounts?

So predictable, I said correct me if I'm wrong not tell me

So what is this serious rule?Iit's not a hard question, just give a straight answer. Why isn't it in CAPS and labelled as "serious rule" if it's so important? How are we supposed to know which rules are serious and which are minor infractions?

Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Promotion of other sites Members are not permitted to promote another site on RM without the permission of an administrator via the personal messaging system. Don't see why that was such a big deal.

I see. Well it seems that I would have to agree that some rules are being applied a lot more stringently than others. Disappointing RM. Edit: Also just clicked what rule has been broken by both members. It's fair enough I guess but still can't argue with the fact a lot of the forum rules are broken every day and are not acted upon. Should maybe define within the rules which rules we are and aren't allowed to break.