KeyserSoze

just had to Willis With Heart And Hand

fuck that ya pair of wallopers we need some MORE Gazza's flute some good old fashioned "shooshing" a bit of a sing song led by our "goalie" a square go perhaps? all topped off with an Advocaat huddle Lets ride it right up them at every single opportunity, bar none........

I agree, hopefully he will stay and learn some techniques to help him with his confidence. He is a classic "confidence" player isn't he? when he's up he's fantastic but when he's down he's utter mince. But yes, there is a player in there.

1. The poster didn't read the article properly - He told people to cut'n'paste from online articles- the VB article said not to fund them - that's funding them ffs 2. No it's not it's still funding them - like what the article said (Plus who wants to wake up with loads n loads of pictures of the thumb whilst trying to eat breakfast) 3. You actually don't because of your statement at number 2. The article said not to fund them by visiting their trash, not "someone do it for us so we can still get fauxed up to fuck" People cut n paste their shite because theirs still an appetite for it on here. Threads go mental, folks crying, grabbing their knees in the corner, spitting and farting over made up pish in a rhag Getting their rage on by proxy if you like.

No one is listening mate (including yourself) Anyway if we have to cut'n'paste an article it's still giving them hits ffs The VB article finished with "Until our print media find some integrity do not fund their biased and corrupt publications." let's try that instead.

it's like fucking Groundhog Day in here. There's more talk of them, pictures of their players, that paper and child sex abuse than Rangers It's getting more and more difficult to read stuff on my own team that's for sure.

God in the wrong boots! (I'll stop now)

God?

https://www.gov.uk/set-up-a-social-enterprise

Just that you would normally comment with a negative - re a bear being so overly critical that's all. My bad

Keep them all add in 10 first teamers - squad of 21 job done unless offers come in that is

shitebag, lying fuck, shitebag bastard are just some of the phrases used to describe Toral based on nothing at all on here I wonder what folks would have said if he played with sore ribs and didn't look or play 100% - I'm guessing some of those statements would be repeated. Folk make up shit then say it a lot so it becomes their truth. Just like a newspaper or a blog or a news report. Fucking stupid if you ask me.

I agree, but from what you posted initially it was clear you hadn't read it!

The use of capitalisation at the word "Tim" and not "rangers" is poor, very poor.

A "warch" list is for someone who is looking out for a war with someone. Which is why it is in inverted comma's you imbecile. I'm "warching" you. Buffoon

Look Scot, if you are going to indulge in this forum you need to get your act together with your English. It's common decency, that's all. You should also talk about Rangers, as all you have done so far is talk about pedo's and shagging, so get a grip - you are on the "warch" list from now on until there are more Rangers related posts than anything else. The clock is ticking.

at least he used full stops ffs

you are not going about this correctly

sheepo's

Did you read his piece? I think things would be different if it was a neutral piece that at least had an element of balance to it. Sadly it was a bit snidey with reference to "imposters" and the hairstyle of one of our directors. Something that the paper has done over time I wish the Dude all the best and hope his pieces are just what you suggest but it's not a good start

O'Neil being shot in the arse by a sniper and Stubbs not knowing where to look

NOW WE ARE TALKING! never happen but. Cos they just want snide references to director's hair doo's and "imposters" and as long as they have that they will pay up.

It's the Rekord but.... they make stuff up don't you know

finally, a short post

That could have been written by any snide journo, Instead it's from one of our own. That saddens me that you OP have decided to join the rhetoric of this paper rather than kick against the pricks. Take their coin by all means but change their ways not fall into line.