willygers4life

Why will there be an egm and in what capacity will Dave king return this year

How do you plan to chase these shareholders away, considering it was Those same backers that kept Wallace in the position he is in, maybe we should chase Paul Murray's backers away

Don't you remember we ain't got money according to some so how could he get anything

If he got sacked could have gotten a pay off, but he has walked away with nothing, and he was used as the scapegoat, he wasn't the only one running the company was it, all I want know know is whom is going to get the unwarranted attention cause seriously who is running the company badly

He should be thanked for not taking a pay off to leave, credit where credit is due IMO, yes he was there. For the over the top spending but he wasn't the only one so people need to remember that, but who are all his haters going to blame for the position we are in now

Stop With your accusations for 5 minutes, has it not been stated where it went. You got what you wanted after BS stopped the ship sinking for a few month at least give him credit for leaving without a payoff. And leaving the club in safe hands with wallace

They bought shares at ipo, then bought off other investors, but still do you back king or favour him to invest and take control of the thread

Do you back Dave king as an investor, did you back Paul Murray at Agm. The easedales bought shares and paid into the club then bought from investors, when others wouldn't, every heard of a second chance, the easedales are under the spotlight so can't really do anything that would be illegal, I myself have been I. Trouble with the police quite recently in 2009 for assault, I served my time and haven't been in any trouble since then does that make me not to be trusted, no it doesn't I have even been involved at coaching upto under 12 level with my assault convictions, if it wasn't for fellow coaches accepting that I was indeed on my second chance I wouldn't have gotten my youth coaching badges upto under16 level. Now I don't coach anymore, but the point I am getting is has the easedales done any wrong while involved with rangers

It's cause the investors currently involved in rangers would get first choice on any new share issue so there percentage doesn't get diluted, then any shares left would he offered to any new investor, so in that reasoning Dave king could still not get any shares

I asked you the question, it is the exact same as the shareholders that backed the board they bought shares at 70p so why would they be willing to lose a anything. If another share offer was to happen, also why would they be willing to let the club value drop more and not invest, if they have to part with money to keep the club in the up then they would. But the whole time you are driven by an agenda and what seems like a hatred all cause Paul Murray didn't get in,, what exactly would he be doing that is different from the current board. Cause no point in seeking investment before the losses are cut otherwise within 12-18 be back at this exact point again of the losses be at the same level again and seeking more investment

So why doesn't he buy his mate Paul Murray's backers shares, I am sure since they was against the board would be keen to sell there shares

So what has the easedales done wrong at rangers to not be trusted, and what has David somers done, just wondering

Wonder how the season ticket holder feel and blame next season when the prices go up and the same performances happen, I got a feeling it is the board that will be at fault, it is actually now time for ally to put his hands up and admit to having been at fault for performances, it no one else to blame apart from ally and his staff not pushing the players to perform better in the park. This ain't a dig at ally just hard truths. And don't the usual lot come out with oh but look at the stats, cause yes we are unbeaten in the league but that is due to the poor quality of strikers we are up against

So why doesn't he got to his mate Paul Murray's backers and offer to buy there shares then, surely that gives him a foothold and majority share in the club, but really if a new share issue happens then the current investors are offered the chance to buy shares so as not to dilute there shares and what is left would be available to king and what not. All this interview is going to Sonia drive a wedge between the hoard and fans. Also as you point out if Dave king bought some shares it would drive the share price up, ain't that a good thing as it would increase the value of the club and then when it came to the next share issue it wold then result in more money for the club. Or don't you want this to happen cause of your hatred for the current investors

Oh well if that is the case who needs investment in the playing squad then if there is no difference in quality, either Dave king and ally is lying about needing investment in the squad to compete in spfl or jig is telling porkies in the quality to make the current performances acceptable, which one is it

It simple, if good old Carson is clear in his mind that someone involved with the board buying, why doesn't he just buy his mate Paul Murray's 28% of backers and the fans shares then he has 30% to push through buying the club. Yes or no

Seriously does everyone really thinking we will still be cost cutting right upto summer 2015, cut cost just now, get another share offering done in The summer then use said investment in January and the summer of 2015, build a team to challenge for the title.

I think too was never really in it, was wanting ticketus to stump up the money so that they became number 1. It seemed to be one excuse after another, then after Charles green got club, tbk claimed that Charles was always favorite and they was never going to get the club. Even though bill miller was actually accepted till he got chased away

So why wait till cva was rejected, green came up with the money, yes the fans could have done it but we didn't, nothing was put forward from the fans for raising money to actually buy the club. There wasn't really time to hang about to see what other offers came in. If say took an extra month for offers after cva rejected we would have struggled to get our licence before season started imo

What gives the impression I am mad

Dortmund ain't a complete fan ownership who, it something like 51/49 percentage ownership ain't it, so who would have bought the club if not Charles green

They put an offer in after everything was signed, why wait till then, and you do remember bill miller was before green and he was chased away, then green came in, why wasn't any other party involved providing prove they had the ffunds

So who would those people be I wonder, if we are kept as a traceable commodity at least then the owners and board would lead with there head and not there heart. Also who do you always make out the current investors are not to be trusted, and if it wasn't green that could have bought the company who would have been a rival with prove of funds to back them up

Point 2 who would have outbid greens lot

Wallace never actually asked the players to take a pay cut, he put a preposition to see of they would consider it, 2 different things, also it is part of cost cutting, Wallace light not have bought shares but creighton has bought shares are you trying to say cause Wallace ain't bought shares then the club is heading to admin. Why the constant shout for Dave king exactly, how wold you feel if current investors but up all the shares at the next share offering, would you still be shouting that they all crooks and wrong uns, and that the club is in the wrong hands