willygers4life

So what you are saying is the original investors are taking money out the club with no one noticing that it's missing

Stockbridge said we would be down to about a million plus there was money due in from merchandise plus a overdraft facility if needed, has the extra money came in and been spent, can't see it really. The story is nothing more than scaremongering, if the finances were that bad why wasn't lee Wallace sold for 900k.

And in all of this it's only Dave king that would save the club, who is to say the current investors would be willing to lose their percentage holding. Seems to me like a non story cause lee Wallace wasn't sold really think if we was going to be broke that he would still be here really, also what fan or supporter would be hoping this is true for big man Dave king to come in.

Big jon with faure maybe

Good performance first half, half decent second so far, this is now the time for ally to let mohsni know he won't be back in the team for a few weeks once suspension is ended, two acts of stupidity from him this season

Hutton is but perry and hegarty are next year I think

Xbox 360/Xbox one Futureshockwrx

That's been similar to what I been thinking, Mather mainly didn't want ally to go out and say he wasn't backed and fans turn against the club, so backed him.

If lee Wallace goes, how does everyone think the team will play and how ally will adjust to it

2nd place at most and a Europa league spot let us build from there

So you feel we should get investment first then cost cut, what happens when the investment money is gone, do we cost cut then or just seek more investment. The more money saved by cutting costs will make more investment available, also graham Wallace is looking at getting more for the contracts we have, which In turn if he pulls it off will be a small investment again

During his interview in the paper the other week did GW not say that he was a quarter of the way through and had 90 days left. The 120 days is a good target as it allowing him to still focus on day to day running of the club along with looking at every contract and any other aspect required.

He be off on the summer it a regular occurrence, Mitchell for example signed a contract extension , gets shipped out then told he not wanted, and next season McKay will be back and where will he play we will still have the players in his position, and can't see ally wanting rid of anyone he took on last summer on free transfers

Are we in Europe no, so even it were true young bill said the cheque for 50 million is there for europe

Ally needs someone that can motivate the players and drop the best mates routine with the players and let them know who is boss, when something goes wrong or the performance drops on the pitch he needs to be shouting from the sidelines,

The point I am trying to get across is ally said these players was to compete against the spfl teams meaning Celtic aswell now they ain't, so what has changed. Now is this ally admitting he failed in improving them or is he admitting they were never good enough and he lied about being judged on them

No I don't think we are good enough, but ally said judge him for his team come September, these players was brought in to compete against teams from top division now he saying they ain't good enough to compete against one of those teams, so why being them in. That's what I am trying to get at, if he built the team then possibly he would have had the funds to buy quality players when needed, the board will be looking at things like that, and if they feel They could bring someone in that could do the job ally is doing and improve on it with the same or less money he is currently on, cause the board is more concerned at value for money than loyalty of ally. And if they felt for the sake of losing some season tickets for a season to bring someone in that could change the way games are played and on less money, and the performances improved then more people in end would buy season tickets. But the way I look at it is if ally was sacked and you never renewed season ticket for that then you backed the man and not the club, and that is my opinion not to say yours is wrong or mine is right but that is how I feel about it

He was injured more than not, he was snapping at his shots cause he was trying to hard to impress, which shows he was actually struggling with the pressure to keep the fans happy. But he will score against us according to everyone that keeps bringing up he scoring in a higher division

Ally said judge him for his team and he was building for challenging spfl teams no today he says needs more investment cause his free transfers can't be expected to compete with the teams in top division, now what does that tell you, to me it saying ally is only worried about each season not looking at building his team, why did he bring all those players in that was free transfers if now he feels they ain't good enough to challenge Celtic. Even though that's what we was told when he signed them, that they was there to challenge the teams from the top division, it also says to me that ally has relised he needs to spend rather than build his team and the only way he can bring success is by spending

Fair enough he scoring goals at a higher level, doesn't explain why games he played for us last season he never scored in lower leagues. That argument is invalid, the pressure of the fans obviously got to him, and he ended up trying to hard, every young player will be affected differently. So in your argument he should score goals against us with ease if both clubs meet next year

I have respected your desire to express you view but accusing other rangers supporters of being obsessed when you have been doing the exact same for months to stick a dagger in,slightly pisses me off, all you do is bang on about king investing and Murray on board, never about giving graham Wallace and the board time to implement changes

Dp

You can talk, you been obsessed since Murray popped his head from behind the sofa, you are obsessed that you cock buddy wasn't deemed good enough by the investors that it's been your obsession to constantly hound the board, you sir are a wallpaper with telling abuser to get over his obsession. You told Murray to get over his obsession and that the only way he will get In the job is if and it's a big if face king buys all the investors out or Murray dips into his pockets and does it

Fair enough but can't see the current investors letting king come on, and hope to god Paul Murray don't come in, down to his lies and the way he acted throughout the turmoil last year.

But Dave king said he wouldn't buy anyone out he would invest in a new share issue and then the current investor ain't going to let there share percentage diluted are they