willygers4life

Exactly, ally being a legend shouldn't warrant extra time in the job as a manager, he lacks the conviction of one. So I have noticed that when anyone posts something up like I have done then the ally backers don't want to answer it or maybe willing to answer it even. It shows a blind loyalty, if ally backers want him still involved then do it as a fan rep, simple

Poor tactics and performances, signing of poor players. Cause we all must remember that he is being judged as a manager not as the man or player

.

Ok take ally out the equation, if it was any other person that was doing what he has done at ibrox what would people being saying mainly ally's backers, let's say if it was Paul le guen

That's what I was thinking would be the excuse, but did ally not say in his Q&A that the players are motivated, so he would be lying one way or the other in regards to this

Ain't making excuses, who is at fault for under performing, and lack of motivation, if we lose tomorrow at Forfar who or what do you think will be excuses

The difference is that games for Motherwell and that is one off games, the only reason for the inprovement from last season is the amount that was spent on wages this season, we could have got by with mohsni,law,Clark and probably bell. There was no need for the others as we had capable players to play in the other positions, then the money spent could have gone on his budget in the summer. The performances have been ok but as the season has progressed we have lost momentum and the motivation has gone. Whose job is it to motivate the players, now if we lose tomorrow at Forfar who will be at fault

And is the board not in the process of sorting it out, they don't need ally to keep passing the buck every time he pulled up about finances, a simple reply would be is it ain't my department. But remember ally still spent the money thinking of only short term, that to me is a sign he world about his ability to put excellent displays on the park. Now remember ally said judge me on my new signings and how they perform, well they have performed badly this season, yeah we scored a lot of goals and won all league games apart from one, but that is down to the quality of opposition.

It simply put ally had money to spend and he wasted it, like a bairn opening his piggy bank. Simple put ally thought he would he able to blow all the money put to him at once and still get more at ever window. Any manager with common sense would have thought wait a minute we ain't got much income cause of where we are, maybe save a little bit for the next window. In all of this the board and ally are at fault, the board for sanctioning all his wants, and ally for wanting to spend all his budget in one window

Deluded, costs need cut before anyone would invest, and it would need to be accepted by current investors before Dave king was considered, stop relying in Dave king for investment. If there was a share issue and costs not cut the money would be spent again. So what different would the Req's do if they got in and made a share issue how would the money not be spent without the cutting of costs

It's under used due to the lack of young ayers being brought through. And just buying players, the place would be more used if it was full time training and the actual pitches being used

That right there would tell me the players are motivated by money and greed rather than the club. It is ally's job to get that motivated and up for the game

The club ain't confirmed a fire sale. The thing is no one would invest till cuts is made, that's why GW has said 120 days to forment a plan and take to investors that are currently shareholders in the club. So you tell me that Dave king would invest just now knowing that the money would be let's say wasted. So is Dave king your only plan for investment, was that Paul Murray's plan aswell. Cause from your posts since the Agm you haven't let it go that Paul Murray and his lot never got anywhere near the boardroom

So then use the money from Dave king and end up back at square one when the money is spent again. Why would Dave king invest when the money is being used, the point of cuts is so the club can survive without having to keep getting investment. And as Wallace has said at the Agm cuts would be made, so he is doing what he said and it classed as going backwards. Seeking investment without the cuts would be going backwards

How are we going backwards, and what different would you do.

How are we going backwards, and what different would you do.

I think it more the point if ally doesn't want to get rid of no one and keep filling the squad up, the old board backed ally to the hilt now ally doesn't want to back the board in what is competent to the secured future of the club

It is something that will or has been discussed, but the director costs is something like 10% of the first team budget so how can you cut it more, then only way to get through this now is to get rid of players

That was agreed by Malcolm Murray, but which in turn was a handed back so can't actually be used as a stick to beat the man now

To me it seems like the targeting of BS was uncalled for then, and also that you are hurting from Murray and co not dipping into there pockets, or actually putting out a plan that would win the vote, maybe if they had facts and not smears it would have been a different story but alas the investors voted for what the thought was right and could do a job without smearing and spreading lies

Do you think it would he right if the board sell Wallace or law, and keep cribari,smith or say simmosen, all cause ally didn't have the testicular fortitude to say who he could do without. Ally is doing what green was guilty of and playing to the crowd. Refuse to do his job and select who can go, to make it all the hoards fault if he is sacked or walks, cause the board couldn't back him

Seems like ally washing his hands of any blame, if fans turn against club. If ally had balls would say to GW that he can get rid of players that's contracts are to end this summer, along with perry and hegarty, due yo these two being injury prone

What's the reasoning behind dumped Crawford

Or it could be that next summer we could be improving the squad vastly while keeping our best players

Is Wiktorski even still at the club, keep smith and punt the rest I would say, he would be good as cover if bell and Gallacher get injured