glasgowrangersno1

Saying people shouldn't be abused is negative? I'm assuming you didn't think that one through. I'm going on what I witness also. I condone it when it happens, even when it doesn't happen to me.

If someone dishes out abuse then they can hardly complain about getting it back but that is, of course, not what I'm talking about. I have witness nothing more than someone giving their opinion and folk telling them to fuck off, that they are a cunt or a taig(the worst one!)

I can take big boy words from keyboard warriors, I've taken them a plenty on here don't worry about that. I hate the offended bus more than the next man, however, what I don't like is people who think it's necessary to abuse fellow fans - it's piss poor. What sort of reverse logic are we working under that the ones being abused for no real reason are the ones in the wrong.

Could you not just have said: "Anyone who says something negative about the board should be abused"? It would have saved you some time. The problem with your novel is that it often doesn't happen the way you describe it.

I'm exactly the same but it doesn't mean people should be allowed to continue doing it.

And the problem is, you and those like you give anyone, who doesn't like the board, that label. Despite them doing none of the above.

Since when are they 2 different things? Let me be clear: - People should behave like adults, and not wee neds. - If people still can't act like adults and insist on abusing fellow fans(regardless of their opinion) then admin should look at it. I don't feel I should have to report something before people stop it.

Maybe people should behave like adults instead of children, just a thought.

Intriguing that the ones who's are deadset against UOF etc are the ones condoning the abuse. The others seems to agree with the OP.

I'm talking in perspective, I've saw it and been the victim of it. If someone has something to say and you don't like it, it doesn't give you the right to abuse them.

There's a difference between stepping in to a debate and stepping in when people saying "fuck off" or "cunt" in response to a someone giving an opinion. The forum is becoming a joke because of some people.

From the record: Scottish Professional Football League Revealed: Cost to SPFL of televising Rangers matches following Ibrox club's collapse sits at £725k THE cash has been dished out as subsidies to the major broadcasters to help them cover production expenses for live broadcasts from remote and ill-equipped grounds. THE cost of the “cashback“ deal between Scotland’s league bosses and TV companies after the Rangers collapse is currently sitting at more than £700,000. Record Sport can reveal £250,000 has already been paid back to broadcasters – with another £250,000 set to follow this summer – for screening the Ibrox club’s rise through the bottom two tiers. The cash has been dished out as subsidies to ESPN, BT Sport and Sky to help them cover the soaring production expenses involved in staging live broadcasts from remote and ill-equipped grounds. And as part of a separate agreement the total payout rose by another £225,000 to a whopping £725,000 after last term’s viewing figures for the full Scottish game failed to hit projected targets. Details of the deal struck in summer 2012 – during crisis talks involving league boss Neil Doncaster, Celtic chief executive Peter Lawwell and the broadcasters – were leaked online over the weekend sparking an angry reaction from fans. Record Sport can confirm the bumper payments were part of the £15million-a-year package negotiated with Sky and ESPN in the wake of the financial collapse at Ibrox which wiped Rangers out of the top flight. But last night SPFL sources denied suggestions the deal was struck to keep Rangers in the media spotlight. And Doncaster said: “The support given to Scottish football by our broadcast partners, in 2012 and since, has been fundamental to the health of our game.” The subsidies, covering seasons 2012-13 and 2013-14, were agreed after ESPN and Sky demanded a share of 15 Rangers matches per season but were unwilling to shell out the extra cash required for live broadcasts at lower-league grounds. ESPN were also paid the viewing figure rebate of £225k. But when their contract was taken over by BT a year ago that clause was removed – sparing the SPFL another big payout. Doncaster is also believed to be angered by claims the TV deal was altered ahead of RangerÂ’ liquidation to stipulate it must include four Old Firm derbies a season. Our SPFL source said: “That stipulation had been part of all the SPLÂ’s TV deals for a decade. It was inserted at the broadcasters request. "So when Rangers collapsed the SPL was in breach of contract. The deal agreed with the broadcasters was saving the game."

Must have had a few takers - it's 14/1 now.

I remember it because taigs were driving around in limos BEFORE the match as if they were celebrating, stupid pricks.

It's a no brainer. People need to stop judging signings on whether they are ex players or not. He's the best finisher in Scotland.

OUT - Cribari, Perry, Hegarty, Little, Simonsen IN - Boyd, Miller, Centre Back, Wide Midfielder. Bell Peralta McCulloch CB Wallace WM Law McLeod Templeton Miller Boyd I must add, I've tried to be realistic, not necessarily what I would do.

The record(if you believe it) says he's agreed less than what Faure and Peralta are on?

Was originally coined by Barca after a game against....yes, Celtic From Wikipedia: In November 2004, Frank Rijkaard described Celtic's style of play as anti-football after FC Barcelona's Champions League match with the Glasgow side.

Our defence is poor by our standards I agree but who exactly do other teams make you think we have such a poor defence for that league.

People might subscribe to the theory that because we aren't winning 6/7 nil every week that we would struggle in the Championship but I disagree. The better the team, the more open they'll play which will suit us better. Yes, McCoist has said it himself but manager will say anything to get more players. I'm not saying I am happy with the current level of performance or that I wouldn't like us to add to the squad.

Pathetic comments from our fans I would say. The player is in a no win situation with regards performances. He's still one of the best players in the league by a country mile.

Some of our fans are an embarrassment. People seem to blame Law for making these comments. How would you feel if your own fans were tweeting you saying you didn't deserve it (and probably much worse). Not the kind of club I want us to be. I'm glad we have high standards but some of the shite people come out with is a joke.

It's an achievement of sorts but not one I would be boasting or going on about. I certainly wouldn't even attempt to compare it to Bayern, that's embarrassing. Let's just get back to the top league and win it, that's what counts.

None taken. It's a sort of up on the dressing room was so we can laugh at it moment.

Lennon said: “Celtic can dominate Scottish football. I think 10 is premature but we have quality and style in the team and we are easy on the eye. “There’s also great mental strength in the side and this doesn’t stop here. We’re looking to build on what we’ve achieved. “This season’s been a transitional period for us but now we don’t want it to end. “I’ve got world-class players in my team. Fraser Forster is one of the greatest goalkeepers in Celtic’s history and he’s allowed us to create a clean-sheet record. Cannot wait to get back and beat these cants