MarvinAndrews

You not seen it?

It does seem picky. The fact we haven't been lumping the ball into the box for headers concerns you?

Not sure why people keep bringing up the Hibs game, saying they missed all these chances and could've won, without mentioning the number of chances we created and missed too. They could've scored 2 or 3 goals had they been more clinical. But so could we have.

So you don't think people should be allowed to have an opinion on people based on their past performances? He's a professional football player, he should be able to, at the very least, put in some tackles and show some heart regardless of who his manager is. That aside, he hasn't been particularly great this season. Only better than last. Also from what I can remember, he set up one goal this season. So far I can remember Zelalem setting up 3 and he's been here a week.

You realise people don't dislike him for no reason, right?

I'm wondering why Ball played there when either of those 2 would've been a better option for me. Ball looks decent but he's not up to much at LB.

I'm not sure why everyone is so worried to be honest. We've played 8 games and conceded 5 goals. It's not exactly the worst defensive record. Plus we've score 30

I know what you mean, you don't want to be one dimensional. I think we tried that against Hibs when they packed the midfield and it didn't work out well. We're better off just playing our game and being patient IMO. Nothing wrong with mixing it up once in a while though. Someone told me none of our goals this season have been headers. Not sure if that's true though

I have, I've been to every one. I disagree that he's been one of the best players. He's been better than last season. That's all. I didn't mean running about alone without anyone near him, I meant running about in itself isn't much use unless you put pressure on someone or put in a challenge. I agree with you there and that's why MW picked Zelalem against our closest rivals so far and only a week after arriving at the club

What is it about Law the you think makes him hard working exactly? Running about alone isn't very effective. He doesn't exactly fly into tackles or get physical in any way. For me Zelalem is by far the better player and should be in the team every week if it's a straight pick between him and Law, which of course it isn't.

You think he gives more energy than Zelalem?

He's been converted to a RB though. Tav's undroppable!

Because he's a physical player and loves a tackle?

Ally?

I like the fact he's taking the piss when it's 5-0/5-1 Would hope it would be different if it was 0-0.

I saw that Basically Rae is a prick

??

Only Zelalem started.

If Hutton does anything of note, I'll eat Warburtons magic hat.

Is he getting a game for them?

No chance, Wilson is a fantastic passer. Especially long passing.

Really? Zelalem/Law? You can't decide?

He'd be a decent addition to the squad. It's all about the squad

So he wasn't good enough for the championship but yet signed for Utd and walked into their team in the Premiership? And what did he do for McKay other than ship him away elsewhere when we were crying out for a player like him? MacLeod came good DESPITE Ally, not thanks to him. Playing him out on the left? It's a testament to how good he was that he managed to get a move to England despite being played out of position while being arguably our best player.

It's a fair point actually, but for for that reason we should've been utilising the Murray Park set-up which in theory should have had enough quality to be able to get us out of the bottom divisions, with the help of the experienced players that stayed, otherwise what's the point in having youth players? And the players we signed on frees were never Rangers players regardless of the division we were in. You are right though, the board(s) were a absolutely no help at all but like you said, it's all behind us now and things are looking up for a change