kirkiebear 1,013 Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 I thought papac was solid and looked comfortable when he came on. He was playin in his REAL position in central defence, not as a wingback. i was very pleased for him today. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
justiston 91 Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 Yeah he looked not bad, won balls in the air, stuck him self in, no real dodgey moments ala Ugo or Svensson. Worth being given a run in the side with Weir. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangersross 6,577 Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 He was pretty good apart from one header where he went at the ball with the back of his neck Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ibroxblue 122 Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 He played very well after being out of the picture for a while. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSuedeSambas 54,498 Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 Papac was good during his first run of games for us and most people acknowledged that and I am right to think some even praised him as a good signing. He looked physically able to play in the SPL and was also very handy with the ball at his feet.It was only when he starting being in and out of the team due to being cup tied that we started to question his ability. I think most players would struggle to come onto a game if they are not playing regularly and I think the criticism was very, very harsh.And just because he was left footed media people assumed he could also play as a full back and when he acted as a stopgap there it became pretty obvious that he couldnt play there.He's one player I think deserves a chance and should not be punted. he has not had a fair chance and just because he was a PLG signing he shouldn't be tarred with the same brush as the rest of his flops IMO. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangersross 6,577 Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 Papac was good during his first run of games for us and most people acknowledged that and I am right to think some even praised him as a good signing. He looked physically able to play in the SPL and was also very handy with the ball at his feet.It was only when he starting being in and out of the team due to being cup tied that we started to question his ability. I think most players would struggle to come onto a game if they are not playing regularly and I think the criticism was very, very harsh.And just because he was left footed media people assumed he could also play as a full back and when he acted as a stopgap there it became pretty obvious that he couldnt play there.He's one player I think deserves a chance and should not be punted. he has not had a fair chance and just because he was a PLG signing he shouldn't be tarred with the same brush as the rest of his flops IMO. Totally agree - shame he's Cup tied Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boab 73 Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 agreed - although put earlier in a thread I had put up but never mind - although Sasa has never played wing back for us, only full back and Centre back but I apoligise for plucking at straws. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
savenosouls 97 Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 I thought he did ok today - but both him & Svenson should be taught how to head a ball properly - ie head it forward, not up in the air!!! Also though Adam & Sionko put in shoker today. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 9 Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 Didn't Papac lose his man for Falkirk's goal? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 Thought Papac was decent at best. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
J_RFC87 762 Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 Didnt impress me that much, and he played Finnigan onside did he not? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 9 Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 Thought Papac was decent at best.Agreed. Not rotten, not spectacular. Just ok, but I swear he cost us the goal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boab 73 Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 I was up at that end but would have to see it again Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 Thought Papac was decent at best.Agreed. Not rotten, not spectacular. Just ok, but I swear he cost us the goal.Agree with that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nvager 498 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Didn't Papac lose his man for Falkirk's goal?Correct Danny - he did. He's kinda like Svensson can appear ok for a spell and then ballwatches, misses his man/the ball/his tackle and we have lost a goal.Not quite good enough and hopeless in the air. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts