terrywarlock 9 Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 I take it everyone hates him because of his second name?Why dont you watch the video then see if you have to ask that questionGrea player, utter prick bit like Beckham Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 Why dont you watch the video then see if you have to ask that questionGrea player, utter prick bit like BeckhamHow is David Beckham, in any way, comparable to O'Sullivan after watching that video? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 25,044 Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 Tosser, scumbag of a man.Not as talented or as good as stephen hendry. A far better and more successful player in EVERY department.even long before hendry, look at people like hurricane higgens, taylor, griffiths, davis and thats just that i can remember, sure the older guys on here will remeber even older players that were better Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommy2212 151 Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 He is a cock, never liked him since this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YdhIp2Io6cPeople pay good money to go and watch him, put bets on him and he just says he's had enough and walks out He says snooker bores him,there is no challenge etc well GTF ya wank if you don't like it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieD 19,326 Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 Tosser, scumbag of a man.Not as talented or as good as stephen hendry. A far better and more successful player in EVERY department.He's clearly more talented than Hendry. He's just deficient in every other department, and that's why Hendry is (was) better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoff 7 Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 He's clearly more talented than Hendry. He's just deficient in every other department, and that's why Hendry is (was) better.Just because commentators have this fantasy about a "flawed genius" doesn't make it true. How can he be more talented than the greatest player ever to play the game. He will never match up. Hendry in his prime was even more consistent and still had higher breaks than o'sullivan. So he can play with both hands, big deal, nothing about O'sullivan comes close to hendry. Away from the table as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,746 Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 I'll give you a game of snooker sometime, no throwing frames though, mind... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dee9 3,997 Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 I have never been a fan of this guy, Stephen Hendry all the way for me! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeReadyStu 70 Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 He's clearly more talented than Hendry. He's just deficient in every other department, and that's why Hendry is (was) better.Hendry's tactical/safety play was what gave him the upper hand on O'Sullivan, in his prime it was just in a different postcode to everybody else including Ronnie. Ronnie is more creative at the table, and has more natural talent than anyone I've ever seen hold a cue. His attacking play is of a higher standard than Hendry's, almost flawless, but Hendry is mentally tougher, and has a winner's mentality, Ronnie doesn't have the mental toughness and can't grind it out when the going gets tough as well as Hendry could. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts