King Jela 20,687 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 Id say that lineup would change like most teams, hut it is a good starting eleven.Our line up doesn't need to change, playing Aluko on the right with Wylde on the left, Lafferty and Jelavic up-front will get goals again. We simply do not need Kris Boyd. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Jela 20,687 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 Sticks in my craw, that Boyd turned his back on us, when we needed him. Sold us out for more money. Failure at M/boro, and only played 76 minutes in his time in Turkey. :beer1:Karma's a bitch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef 436 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 Our line up doesn't need to change, playing Aluko on the right with Wylde on the left, Lafferty and Jelavic up-front will get goals again. We simply do not need Kris Boyd.So no striker at all is needed ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott-RFC 308 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 I'd rather have Boyd than sandaza, and miller over either Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Jela 20,687 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 So no striker at all is needed ?Where did I say that ? I said we don't need Kris Boyd. Try reading posts properly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef 436 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 Where did I say that ? I said we don't need Kris Boyd. Try reading posts properly. I read, And u said the wings, aluko and wylde yeaaah,, laff and jella to score goals. That would work but I'm sure Boyd will be perfect back up even for your preferred line up.Unless it's personal mate, who would u have, for free transfer of course Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Jela 20,687 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 I read, And u said the wings, aluko and wylde yeaaah,, laff and jella to score goals. That would work but I'm sure Boyd will be perfect back up even for your preferred line up.Unless it's personal mate, who would u have, for free transfer of courseI'd honestly rather pay money for a striker than have Kris Boyd back. And its honestly nothing to do with the way he left us, he's played 72 minutes of football in 4 months and put on a good stone or two. I like Zandasa, and for £400,000 I think buying him would be a bargain. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfcfraserrfc 262 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 Boyd single handedly won us 2 trophies in the manchester season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef 436 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 I'd honestly rather pay money for a striker than have Kris Boyd back. And its honestly nothing to do with the way he left us, he's played 72 minutes of football in 4 months and put on a good stone or two. I like Zandasa, and for £400,000 I think buying him would be a bargain.sandaza is injury prone, Boyd is proven though will need to do that again, I'm perplexed why people would pay for sandaza when Boyd is a free.I agree about laff and take stick when I show support for the guy at times, but Boyd is to good to not attempt his return Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 Where did I say that ? I said we don't need Kris Boyd. Try reading posts properly. Boyd is probably as good as any striker we could get right now, you may not have noticed but our finances are limited. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
minstral 5,375 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 Boyd single handedly won us 2 trophies in the manchester season.Shame he could not have won us the title. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Jela 20,687 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 Boyd is probably as good as any striker we could get right now, you may not have noticed but our finances are limited.Disagree. And our finances are not good ? Fuck, I didn't know that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IamRangers 12 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 Boyd single handedly won us 2 trophies in the manchester season.Remind me when that was?....4 years ago. Boyd has gone backwards on so many levels since then Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Jela 20,687 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 sandaza is injury prone, Boyd is proven though will need to do that again, I'm perplexed why people would pay for sandaza when Boyd is a free.I agree about laff and take stick when I show support for the guy at times, but Boyd is to good to not attempt his returnSo he'd definitely score goals then, guaranteed ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef 436 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 So he'd definitely score goals then, guaranteed ?Would sandaza? Would still only be backup with your preferred line up, id rather pay nowt regardless and Boyd knows the club wwll Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Jela 20,687 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 Would sandaza? Would still only be backup with your preferred line up, id rather pay nowt regardless and Boyd knows the club wwllI don't think Sandaza would score as much as Boyd used to, but I think he'd link up and create a healthy amount of goals along with chipping in with his fair share, definitely. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef 436 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 I don't think Sandaza would score as much as Boyd used to, but I think he'd link up and create a healthy amount of goals along with chipping in with his fair share, definitely.Can wee really afford to pay for an injury prone player but Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CyprusBear 1 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 For me id take him back. But i think he knows he would have to pull his finger out big time and well we all know running around is not his game!!But with boyd you need to give him service and the way were playing at the moment boyd wont work. Altough id still take him back we also need to get some more creativity into the team.For me id let Jelavic and Davis go aslong as coisty gets all the money to spend. Get down into the lower english leagues and sign up players like ricky lambert and jordan rhodes.Bit contreversial maybe!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Jela 20,687 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 Can wee really afford to pay for an injury prone player butI'd certainly rather take the chance than sign Boyd. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicika Jelavic 7 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 Thankfully he won't be returning. Thank fuck. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 And our finances are not good ? Fuck, I didn't know that.Well, because of that I don't see how people can turn their nose up at the idea of signing a striker with Boyd's goal record in the SPL.He may have struggled elsewhere for goals since leaving (although you could argue the Nottingham Forest loan actually showed he was capable) but the SPL is a poorer league than the likes of the Championship and Turkey. And that's the league we play in and need to win every year, Stokes is prime example of someone who was attracted to clubs in England by his goal tally in Scotland, couldn't hit a barn door down south but came back to the SPL and started scoring all the time again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Jela 20,687 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 Well, because of that I don't see how people can turn their nose up at the idea of signing a striker with Boyd's goal record in the SPL.He may have struggled elsewhere for goals since leaving (although you could argue the Nottingham Forest loan actually showed he was capable) but the SPL is a poorer league than the likes of the Championship and Turkey. And that's the league we play in and need to win every year, Stokes is prime example of someone who was attracted to clubs in England by his goal tally in Scotland, couldn't hit a barn door down south but came back to the SPL and started scoring all the time again.You can't understand why people wouldn't want to re-sign a weight gained striker who has played 72 of football in 4-6 months ? Not to mention the fact the striker doesn't help the team and purely relies on the assistance of other. We need players in who can create for our main striker, not a striker who relies on players to create for him. He'd be useless in our current team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef 436 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 it would be in our best interests on many levels, fans will just have to put there personal feeling to the side for the clubs interests, if it were to happen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 You can't understand why people wouldn't want to re-sign a weight gained striker who has played 72 of football in 4-6 months ? Not to mention the fact the striker doesn't help the team and purely relies on the assistance of other. We need players in who can create for our main striker, not a striker who relies on players to create for him. He'd be useless in our current team.He's had injury problems, if he was signed obviously he'd be recovering from them.No I can't understand it, you just have to look at our striking options outside of Jelavic and Lafferty and I don't see how Boyd wouldn't be a useful option to have, and I don't see how everything has to be centred around Jelavic considering some of his average displays this season and him probably not being here beyond the summer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef 436 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 Boyd Boyd Boyd. Certainly puts a Smile on my face all oh this gossip Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts