Non_Sucumbi 876 Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Good article in www.thelawyer.comCollier Bristow Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
J_RFC87 761 Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 This is a very interesting article for a number of reasons.It is certainly doing the rounds around a lot of firms down here. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sergio 1,199 Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 This is a very interesting article for a number of reasons.It is certainly doing the rounds around a lot of firms down here.Has there been any reaction to it, do they think we have a solid case ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebear4eva 6 Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 having read that i reckon now that sdm did have rangers best intrests at heart but he is still guilty of no doin his homework on whyte . whyte n whitney seem to be in the smelly stuff Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loyalfollower 1,543 Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 To me it doesnt say anything we didnt already know. Ofcourse the firm will defend itself.it has a right to. Lawyers can be dodgy bastards if you pay one enough. As if some as dishonest as whyte would have a credible lawyer. Its bolloks and that withey is an embarrasment to that company Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,287 Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 To me it doesnt say anything we didnt already know. Ofcourse the firm will defend itself.it has a right to. Lawyers can be dodgy bastards if you pay one enough. As if some as dishonest as whyte would have a credible lawyer. Its bolloks and that withey is an embarrasment to that companyFair point ... it's like rats fighting in a sack now Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guardian 4,281 Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 So Minis £25m bid at the time was only a share offer.Even then he wanted us to fund his crown. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BritishBear 34 Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 To me it doesnt say anything we didnt already know. Ofcourse the firm will defend itself.it has a right to. Lawyers can be dodgy bastards if you pay one enough. As if some as dishonest as whyte would have a credible lawyer. Its bolloks and that withey is an embarrasment to that companyToo true, Lawyers are a bunch of mercenary bastards.Withey is fucked, he'll end up losing his licence and that's at least a little bit of karma on the cunt. Collyer Bristow must also be losing business due to the bad publicity.Fully expect Collyer Bristow to settle. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 Reiterates most of what we knew and still seems damming !! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ritchieshearercaldow 22,190 Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 First I've heard of threats made to this lawyer, normally it would be headline news, still I suppose it's a good excuse to do a runner Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BritishBear 34 Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 First I've heard of threats made to this lawyer, normally it would be headline news, still I suppose it's a good excuse to do a runnerYeah and at the time, these threats were so sinister, none were reported to the Metropolitan Police. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.