Jump to content

Typical Mark Dingwall


Recommended Posts

If people disagree with me critisising Dingwall's post then they should say why, different opinions are obviously allowed.

Writing it off as 'obsession' is just petty rubbish.

If you think it is not an obsession you should say why, different opinions are allowed.

But I don't argue with obsessives.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 259
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I've tried to lay off him on that basis, but I find what he posted beneath contempt on a day like this.

Trouble is some people actually listen to him and the RST give him a voice.

RST made a couple of good statements in a period of 5 months.

Not good enough. no credibilty left and will have no future within our club going forward.

If they don't see it they really are deluded.

Link to post
Share on other sites

RST made a couple of good statements in a period of 5 months.

Not good enough. no credibilty left and will have no future within our club going forward.

If they don't see it they really are deluded.

Nail, head.

Time for change where EVERYONE has faith in the trust, may even entice many more to join.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is getting tedious every time some one is critical of something Dingwall says we get some clown in here claiming that RM has an obsession with him. If Mr Dingwall does not like criticism then perhaps he should stop making statements like this.

This is not FF and although I find some of the topic and discussions that go on here distasteful I respect peoples rights to discuss what they wish which is why i joined RM as people don't get banned for not following the party line.

Perhaps some people might be better received if they actually argued the facts in a reasonable way rather than these tiresome claims of obsession which I find particulary objectionable as I for one do not have an obsession I just frequently find myself disagreeing with what he says.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps some people might be better received if they actually argued the facts in a reasonable way rather than these tiresome claims of obsession which I find particulary objectionable as I for one do not have an obsession I just frequently find myself disagreeing with what he says.

An interesting thing to say, but some of us prefer to stick to the facts rather then post things that might be well recieved.

The vehemence of the reaction to people pointing out RM's obsession is, in itself, evidence of that obsession.

Link to post
Share on other sites

An interesting thing to say, but some of us prefer to stick to the facts rather then post things that might be well recieved.

The vehemence of the reaction to people pointing out RM's obsession is, in itself, evidence of that obsession.

Fuck me, I quoted the whole post, what facts did I miss out?

I have an interpretation of it, if some see differently it's up to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Upcoming Events

    No upcoming events found

×
×
  • Create New...