nemisis 358 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 Not everybody has the same opinion on FF there are a lot of arguements the only thing you get banned for that i have seen is personal abuse and being one of themso you dont even read the FF forum then?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted July 28, 2012 Author Share Posted July 28, 2012 What's the point of talking about real Rangers men when none of them could better a paltry £5.5 million Ah but they did.Pity a big part of their bid was based on us reaching the Champions League quarter finals. :anguish: Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bombaybadboy08 15,660 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 What's the point of talking about real Rangers men when none of them could better a paltry £5.5 million This is true and Walter Smith was even talked into being the face of a bid only to be left looking like a fool when the folk behind the bid realised they don't love Rangers that much. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
snoopyboymason 13 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 so you dont even read the FF forum then??Yeah i'm a member Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemisis 358 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 Yeah i'm a memberThree other explanations come to mind then, 1. amnesia, 2. you are a thick cunt, 3 You are a liar. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
snoopyboymason 13 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 Three other explanations come to mind then, 1. amnesia, 2. you are a thick cunt, 3 You are a liar.Ah personal abuse i take they banned you Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiebreak54 151 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 IF it's such a great site why do they ban anybody who says the most innocuous things just because they disagree with them.IMO that attitude makes it the poorest of sites. If everybody needs to have the same opinion then what's the feckin point of the place.From what I can gather, this forum: General support for Green, anti RST, anti ff. FF, generally against Green, pro RST, anti RM.Anybody on either forum who has their own opinion and breaks the 'unwritten house rules' often face a barrage of criticism. So how does this forum differ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemisis 358 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 Ah personal abuse i take they banned you Ah changing the subject, take it I hit too near to home Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MayboleLoyal_atb 3,772 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 He's a fud Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemisis 358 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 From what I can gather, this forum: General support for Green, anti RST, anti ff. FF, generally against Green, pro RST, anti RM.Anybody on either forum who has their own opinion and breaks the 'unwritten house rules' often face a barrage of criticism. So how does this forum differ?You are allowed to post different opi nions here is the MAJOR difference. FF people come here to debate, ask your self why. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
snoopyboymason 13 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 Ah changing the subject, take it I hit too near to home No i would just say my views are more akin to FF i used to take abuse on here for not liking Murray(but he gave us 9 in a row) and Ferguson 2nd time around.Have you ever been on FF? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nimrod 62 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 So how does this forum differ?Well I've never been banned from here.I've been banned three times from FF.See the pattern. If this site had a similar attitude to FF, you and me wouldn't be having this dialogue. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane 338 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 Found out today a FF admin didn't take too kindly to my "CUNT" profile of Stewie Rhegan when someone posted it up. What a bunch of shallow self-serving cunts they've got over there Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buzz 306 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 It's amusing that whenever there's a thread on Dingwall/RST on this place, the same posters with the same low post counts who post on no other threads come out to defend him.It's almost as if they're from another forum and as soon as one of these threads appear, the alarm bell is rung and they all rush off to defend him. Perhaps the alarm bell is situated in an almost 'Secret Lounge' sort of forum. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane 338 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 It's amusing that whenever there's a thread on Dingwall/RST on this place, the same posters with the same low post counts who post on no other threads come out to defend him.It's almost as if they're from another forum and as soon as one of these threads appear, the alarm bell is rung and they all rush off to defend him. Perhaps the alarm bell is situated in an almost 'Secret Lounge' sort of forum. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiebreak54 151 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 It's amusing that whenever there's a thread on Dingwall/RST on this place, the same posters with the same low post counts who post on no other threads come out to defend him.It's almost as if they're from another forum and as soon as one of these threads appear, the alarm bell is rung and they all rush off to defend him. Perhaps the alarm bell is situated in an almost 'Secret Lounge' sort of forum. You mean low posters who strongly believe in the RST, attempt to defend the organisation from constant criticism? yes, that is amusing....... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
S1lv3r 274 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 WHO is this guy Dingwall ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buzz 306 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 You mean low posters who strongly believe in the RST, attempt to defend the organisation from constant criticism? yes, that is amusing....... Strongly believe in the RST?Interesting. By that, do you mean you strongly believe in the idea, its aims, its principles, its board, its statements or its reputation with its fellow Rangers organisations?There are many aspects to believing in the RST. Some I also believe very strongly in. Others, not so much. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RowP113 2 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 ironic name for a website mr dingwall Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted July 28, 2012 Author Share Posted July 28, 2012 From what I can gather, this forum: General support for Green, anti RST, anti ff. FF, generally against Green, pro RST, anti RM.Anybody on either forum who has their own opinion and breaks the 'unwritten house rules' often face a barrage of criticism. So how does this forum differ?FF are also pro-hurting the club (but buying STs).Big difference. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane 338 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 Strongly believe in the RST?Interesting. By that, do you mean you strongly believe in the idea, its aims, its principles, its board, its statements or its reputation with its fellow Rangers organisations?There are many aspects to believing in the RST. Some I also believe very strongly in. Others, not so much.By strongly believing in the RST he means paying his money and taking no part in anything to do with it, as stated prior. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
S1lv3r 274 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 All I can say is that all of the so-called Rangers fans who are against Mr Green and Super Ally and their stance against this MOST AWFUL MHANKY sfa lot can go flee.... piss off like. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trueblue68 2,497 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 Just sharing my disappointment that nobody has posted the dancing Dingwall in this thread. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiebreak54 151 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 By strongly believing in the RST he means paying his money and taking no part in anything to do with it, as stated prior. Yes, that is true. You are aware that the trust has 1200-1400 members, how many are involved with the running of the organisation? Very few. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted July 29, 2012 Share Posted July 29, 2012 Precisely what is your argument, arguing the facts is precisely what I was saying rather than this constant allegations of obsession when anyone says anything against dingwall or what he has said.As regarding the point of the alleged vehemence of reaction being evidence, what total and unmitigated drivel. So for example allowing that some one got annoyed as many people do when someone calls them a racist or sexist or even a sexist racist, by your distinctly dubious logic that would make them guilty of the alleged allegation.Total garbage which is obviously designed to detract from the point that this statement is in some way supposed to stop people taking issue with statements they disagree with. Don't think soLMAO: Yet another goes for the obsession card, how predictableI get it, you don't think such an obsession exists.You are wrong.But well done, you used a lot of words being wrong Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.df745cc91b83abab0590131961ba2774.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.