Roger Mitchell Has A Go At Green

[Jimfanciesthedude 24,540]

Charles said that if Dave King got his way and the cva was refused, that our whole history and tradition would be swept aside. The full comment wasnt in regard to nobody purchasing our club, it was in regard to the cva failing and us going the newco route.

quite simply he could have said that because king and co didn't have a back up plan. King or the blue knights didn't have a plan to keep the club together if the cva failed.

If the blue knights had their cva knocked back there was nothing stopping anyone with a bit of cash (not the blue knights as they had fuck all) buying the assets and closing the club down. Or different people buying the assets singularly

green on the otherhand bought all assets and kept the club going as a club. It's two different scenario's

[Jimfanciesthedude 24,540]

and they were said in the context of a cva failing.

exactly it "A" cva failing i.e a cva with no back up plan. Green had a back up plan

[bombaybadboy08 15,660]

While the article that the Op has posted is no doubt written by a rhabid beast, it does us no favours to try re-write history. Charles said that if Dave King got his way and the cva was refused, that our whole history and tradition would be swept aside. The full comment wasnt in regard to nobody purchasing our club, it was in regard to the cva failing and us going the newco route. Link to video below so people can decide for themselves.

Its open to debate what he meant about our "history and tradition" would be swept aside, but denying he said it in regards to a cva failure, is only lying to yourself.

http://www.bbc.co.uk...otball/18369796 1:40 onwards for the cva comments.

1.The OP is a lot of pish.

2.You are the banned poster 'comeoffit',your obsession with quoting the same pish over and over again gives the game away.