Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted July 16, 2013 Share Posted July 16, 2013 Thanks for the complimentOMG...how tedious is this becoming Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted July 16, 2013 Share Posted July 16, 2013 Thanks for the complimentI'm sure it seems to be. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NamibianBear 1,853 Posted July 16, 2013 Share Posted July 16, 2013 What do I have to say to end this stream of drivel?"Goodbye" and then not look into this thread again. Simple really. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted July 16, 2013 Share Posted July 16, 2013 "Goodbye" and then not look into this thread again. Simple really.The RST puppets have successfully diverted any attention away from awkward questionsIt's an art form now Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Beast 9,515 Posted July 16, 2013 Share Posted July 16, 2013 I believe he was looking to get the thread locked. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted July 16, 2013 Share Posted July 16, 2013 I believe he was looking to get the thread locked.There can be no other explanation for such bizarre behaviour Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NamibianBear 1,853 Posted July 16, 2013 Share Posted July 16, 2013 I believe he was looking to get the thread locked.There can be no other explanation for such bizarre behaviourCan he not see that by getting the answers to all the questions, minds would be put at ease and more people would join the RST? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted July 16, 2013 Share Posted July 16, 2013 Can he not see that by getting the answers to all the questions, minds would be put at ease and more people would join the RST?That would be dependant on the answers of course Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainofIndustry 921 Posted July 16, 2013 Share Posted July 16, 2013 Can he not see that by getting the answers to all the questions, minds would be put at ease and more people would join the RST?Manticore has an odd attitude, he only ever posts when the RST are criticised. Every time it happens, he posts more or less the same statements.Not sure what his angle is, TBH. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted July 16, 2013 Share Posted July 16, 2013 Manticore has an odd attitude, he only ever posts when the RST are criticised. Every time it happens, he posts more or less the same statements.Not sure what his angle is, TBH.Deflector in chief? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted July 16, 2013 Share Posted July 16, 2013 Manticore has an odd attitude, he only ever posts when the RST are criticised. Every time it happens, he posts more or less the same statements.Not sure what his angle is, TBH.not true. Manti will argue about anything, his speciality is semantics Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NamibianBear 1,853 Posted July 16, 2013 Share Posted July 16, 2013 That would be dependant on the answers of courseOf course, that goes without saying. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted July 16, 2013 Share Posted July 16, 2013 I m so out of touch, who was trying to get that thread closed? And why do people argue, I have never saw the sense in this, merely ask a question and the person will reply, if the reply leads to other questions ......then we have a discussion. This is all I look for on this forum. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace 3,645 Posted July 16, 2013 Author Share Posted July 16, 2013 Is that so, can you explain then Ace how Data Protection Laws are broken when RST mailing lists are used to sell a fanzine from £ollow £ollow? As I've said before, I'm not in any kind of any inner circle so I've never heard if this before, if true then yes, it is an egregious break of DPA ... if true !! Do you know this for a fact, you have irrefutable proof of this claim because if you do, then I presume that you have reported this infarction to the authorities ??After all, you believe the RST in a dead duck, why not use this evidence as the killing blow?Again, if its true!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Army 4,146 Posted July 16, 2013 Share Posted July 16, 2013 Can he not see that by getting the answers to all the questions, minds would be put at ease and more people would join the RST?Ask this question.RST (The person) has made the claim that Mark Dingwall never ever owed the RST almost £2,700.She claims that he donated £2,700 to the RST after money was lost at functions.Did MD attend these functions and did he pay for his tables either on the night or before the function ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NamibianBear 1,853 Posted July 16, 2013 Share Posted July 16, 2013 Ask this question.RST (The person) has made the claim that Mark Dingwall never ever owed the RST almost £2,700.She claims that he donated £2,700 to the RST after money was lost at functions.Did MD attend these functions and did he pay for his tables either on the night or before the function ?The sum of 2700 or whatever appears in another question regarding the resignation of the treasurer. Is this related to that before I ask the same question in two different ways? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Army 4,146 Posted July 16, 2013 Share Posted July 16, 2013 The sum of 2700 or whatever appears in another question regarding the resignation of the treasurer. Is this related to that before I ask the same question in two different ways?The £2,700 was the sum that was owed to the RST by Mark Dingwall of FF, It was owed for almost 2 years. with no interest payable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NamibianBear 1,853 Posted July 16, 2013 Share Posted July 16, 2013 The £2,700 was the sum that was owed to the RST by Mark Dingwall of FF, It was owed for almost 2 years. with no interest payable.Yes I have that already as a point to raise with them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Army 4,146 Posted July 16, 2013 Share Posted July 16, 2013 Yes I have that already as a point to raise with them.RST made a fatal mistake and said that Mark Dingwall gifted £2,700 to the Trust.In previous discussions other RST reps have said it was money he owed for tables he purchased at fund raisers. My questions are. Did Mark Dingwall attend these fundraisers, if he did then why did he take 2 years to pay the money that the RST obviously paid up front, That would constitute an interest free loan of Rangers Supporters money. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NamibianBear 1,853 Posted July 16, 2013 Share Posted July 16, 2013 RST made a fatal mistake and said that Mark Dingwall gifted £2,700 to the Trust.In previous discussions other RST reps have said it was money he owed for tables he purchased at fund raisers.My questions are. Did Mark Dingwall attend these fundraisers, if he did then why did he take 2 years to pay the money that the RST obviously paid up front, That would constitute an interest free loan of Rangers Supporters money.The question is already in the list. Before they are sent out everyone can see them and suggest changes/check they ask the right things to your satisfaction. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resting in my account 231 Posted July 16, 2013 Share Posted July 16, 2013 As I've said before, I'm not in any kind of any inner circle so I've never heard if this before, if true then yes, it is an egregious break of DPA ... if true !!Do you know this for a fact, you have irrefutable proof of this claim because if you do, then I presume that you have reported this infarction to the authorities ??After all, you believe the RST in a dead duck, why not use this evidence as the killing blow?Again, if its true!!Indeed, when I joined the forum community namely ££ I used a yahoo account I opened in college, this was when emails were foreign to myself. As I got more proficient with the internet, I set up a hotmail account which I used when I was a member of the RST. The only other thing I used that email account for was Our Wee Country forum. I know this as fact because of the immature email address it was under. By the time I was banned from ££, which was around 2008/2009 I was using a much more professional email name which is still used by me today. I have had many ££ emails yo my original hotmail, which under no circumstances did I ever use for ££.Also, it may be worth asking Big Mark if he has ever used RST finances to post fanzines or other ££ garbage through along with RST material. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainofIndustry 921 Posted July 16, 2013 Share Posted July 16, 2013 Indeed, when I joined the forum community namely ££ I used a yahoo account I opened in college, this was when emails were foreign to myself. As I got more proficient with the internet, I set up a hotmail account which I used when I was a member of the RST. The only other thing I used that email account for was Our Wee Country forum. I know this as fact because of the immature email address it was under. By the time I was banned from ££, which was around 2008/2009 I was using a much more professional email name which is still used by me today. I have had many ££ emails yo my original hotmail, which under no circumstances did I ever use for ££.Also, it may be worth asking Big Mark if he has ever used RST finances to post fanzines or other ££ garbage through along with RST material.Fuck me! What I'll never understand is how guys like Stephen Smith and David Edgar can be so wilfully complicit in this man's appalling chicanery. Are they afraid that Mark Dingwall won't be their friend if they speak out? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 not true. Manti will argue about anything, his speciality is semantics There is only one thing worse than being talked about... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 I already figured that out.It was a fucking stupid question in that case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrhead loyalist 10 Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 Why not get a true fans group involved with the board , why not the VB,s they are the one real group who will fight to the death for the club, and before anyone accuses me of being a member of VB , I can assure u I'm not Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts