Young Bob 1,360 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 http://www.scribd.co...4/Ibrox-Stadium Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Young Bob 1,360 Posted September 2, 2013 Author Share Posted September 2, 2013 Having a quick google this guy Morgan seems to have had a few companies all of which have had nothing to do with facilities management. Anyone know of Morgan? Has he invested in Rangers? To me this is why we need to have the accounts scrutinised. Its an easy way to ship money out of a company. Also somebody asked if Overmans was still there. According to this it would appear he is. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
barcodebear 85 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Herron no longer at Rangers?A fair few will be pleased with that? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Travelrug 268 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Reckon that bloggers English teacher will be looking for a change of career if he had the misfortune to read that article. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 This does seem a little plausible but not quite convincing, given the poorly written quality of the piece. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Rd 2,860 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Only bit that interested me was the Ken Overmans piece, if true he is still in our payroll ! Why TF is he? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Young Bob 1,360 Posted September 2, 2013 Author Share Posted September 2, 2013 This does seem a little plausible but not quite convincing, given the poorly written quality of the piece.Im not really worried about the quality of the writing. There were rumours when Ross got bagged of some dodgy goings on. As mentioned its a bit odd that a company with no maintenance experience has taken control. If it means cost reduction with similar work quality why not but it is being claimed they are overcharging. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexander7 2 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 This does seem a little plausible but not quite convincing, given the poorly written quality of the piece.Well done. Play the man not the ball. Shoot the messenger. Don't under any circumstances check out the information.It may be right it may be wrong. It is worth checking rather than dismissed with slight condescension. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Well done. Play the man not the ball. Shoot the messenger. Don't under any circumstances check out the information.It may be right it may be wrong. It is worth checking rather than dismissed with slight condescension.You do know what plausible means, don't you? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Rd 2,860 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Well done. Play the man not the ball. Shoot the messenger. Don't under any circumstances check out the information.It may be right it may be wrong. It is worth checking rather than dismissed with slight condescension.Some other blogger always uses that phrase! I wonder who? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,512 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 It comes across as a bit of scaremongering to me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverBlue_Since91 2,895 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 People still won't listen. As Mather and Stockbridge have invested there own money into Rangers thats all that counts to some people.It's a joke that when these stories come out other Rangers fans see it as "scaremongering" Remember the last time yous all said this? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverBlue_Since91 2,895 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 It comes across as a bit of scaremongering to me.Doesn't sound like Scaremongering to me. Just sounds like a Rangers fan in the know and it not sitting back on it. Remember the slagging some people got for not telling us about Whyte ie Rangers board members? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Well done. Play the man not the ball. Shoot the messenger. Don't under any circumstances check out the information.It may be right it may be wrong. It is worth checking rather than dismissed with slight condescension.Oh Hello!!!!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexander7 2 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 You do know what plausible means, don't you?Yes I do. And once again you play the man not the ball. Plausible is not the same as "seems plausible but not quite convincing" Your underlying message struck me as dismissive..You come across as a knowledgeable guy in most of your posts. Can this not be easily checked out by people close to the scene? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainofIndustry 921 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Having a quick google this guy Morgan seems to have had a few companies all of which have had nothing to do with facilities management. Anyone know of Morgan? Has he invested in Rangers? To me this is why we need to have the accounts scrutinised. Its an easy way to ship money out of a company. Also somebody asked if Overmans was still there. According to this it would appear he is.I've met Iain Morgan. Active Corporate were/are behind the Rangers Crossbar Challenge. I was asked through a mutual supplier to help promote it on social media some months ago, which I did briefly.I don't know if he personally invested in the IPO but I would suspect Morgan has taken a great deal more out of Rangers than anything he may have put in. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Beast 9,274 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 To me it sounds like the rants of a bitter ex employee Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexander7 2 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Some other blogger always uses that phrase! I wonder who?My apologies if I was using some well-worn cliches. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Beast 9,274 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Well done. Play the man not the ball. Shoot the messenger. Don't under any circumstances check out the information.It may be right it may be wrong. It is worth checking rather than dismissed with slight condescension.So what's your name on FF? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,512 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 People still won't listen. As Mather and Stockbridge have invested there own money into Rangers thats all that counts to some people.It's a joke that when these stories come out other Rangers fans see it as "scaremongering" Remember the last time yous all said this?The part about Asbestos, most companies need to get specialists in both for testing and removal, nothing out of the ordinary. Also the public tendoring part, as far as I'm believe we're a private company and have no obligations regarding who we give contracts too. I suppose this is just more information that we can all comment on pending the accounts being published. Iv said it countless times but FB is certainly the man I want in charge of finance. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 It's got to the stage where the bheasts are the least of our worries now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Yes I do. And once again you play the man not the ball. Plausible is not the same as "seems plausible but not quite convincing" Your underlying message struck me as dismissive..You come across as a knowledgeable guy in most of your posts. Can this not be easily checked out by people close to the scene?Since I consider it to be somewhat plausible, I think it's worthy of further investigation. Only the truth will confirm or dismiss the assertions. Therefore, it is completely appropriate for the question to be asked of the board. Nonetheless, we would be equally wise not to take it for granted until we know the facts. We should be wary of possible scaremongering and propagandising by now, even whilst asking those questions. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Young Bob 1,360 Posted September 2, 2013 Author Share Posted September 2, 2013 I've met Iain Morgan. Active Corporate were/are behind the Rangers Crossbar Challenge. I was asked through a mutual supplier to help promote it on social media some months ago, which I did briefly.I don't know if he personally invested in the IPO but I would suspect Morgan has taken a great deal more out of Rangers than anything he may have put in. Fair enough as long as we got value for money. Has he been involved in facilities management before to your knowledge? At least we know there was a standing connection with the club. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCDBigBear 10,865 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Doesn't sound like Scaremongering to me. Just sounds like a Rangers fan in the know and it not sitting back on it.Remember the slagging some people got for not telling us about Whyte ie Rangers board members?No facts or figures though, just allegations. Tell you what, note down your questions and ask about this at the AGM. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
8Ace 49 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 To me it sounds like the rants of a bitter ex employeeThis ^^^^The points may be perfectly valid, but they are being clouded by the author's personal bitterness. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.