Possibly the most important agm in our history

[JamieG54 812]

Did he pay tho' ?? Lol

Can of cream soda and two mars bars covered it.

[Ace 3,556]

EVERY share holder should turn up or ensure their proxy vote has been passed to someone who will vote in a manner they themselves would ... be it for or against the board.

[The Beast 9,262]

Seems a dig at those who chose to purchase their shares through the RST is actually more important.

But if you did this you haven't actually purchased any shares in Rangers. That's the point.

[TheLawMan 6,240]

Because that was the condition on which the EGM was cancelled for. If it doesnt happen by then (or invites and accounts sent out 21 days prior) then they will reactivate the EGM call.

Got ye. I thought you were meaning something different.

[Ace 3,556]

But if you did this you haven't actually purchased any shares in Rangers. That's the point.

Shares were purchased, so your statement in incorrect. They are controlled via RST but all the money raised via the scheme was invested in the clubs IPO

[Gillete 1,338]

Will this likely be at ibrox ?

[woodvale1690 43]

Shares were purchased, so your statement in incorrect. They are controlled via RST but all the money raised via the scheme was invested in the clubs IPO

is it not true that when you buy into a share scheme like rst, the block vote of 12% only has one vote, might be wrong tho?

[Carsons Dog 9,878]

It wouldn't have appealed to me but it still gave fans an option to invest especially if money was tight but they still wanted to do their bit. These fans are also buying with no expectations of a vote or a place at the meeting so they knew what they were getting into.

I don't know how they work it or have any knowledge of the RST but I would like to imagine they will have some sort of proportional voting system which will be utilised prior to the AGM.

The RST have nailed their colours firmly to the Mini mast regardless of how many of the people who invested in their scheme agree or not

I would be surprised if the investors were consulted

[Ace 3,556]

is it not true that when you buy into a share scheme like rst, the block vote of 12% only has one vote, might be wrong tho?

As far as I know, you are wrong.

As Easdale has 24% of the vote because he has 24% of the shares, the fans (with RST included) have 12% of the vote with 12% of the shares.

[Ace 3,556]

The RST have nailed their colours firmly to the Mini mast regardless of how many of the people who invested in their scheme agree or not

I would be surprised if the investors were consulted

Glad you're surprised. RST members are consulted

[RST 19]

is it not true that when you buy into a share scheme like rst, the block vote of 12% only has one vote, might be wrong tho?

You are wrong. We have the voting rights of over 300,000 shares.

[shankillblue1 349]

It is indeed the most important AGM in our history and the mini/McColl cabal can be buried for good for the crimes committed against our Club by them. End of!

[shankillblue1 349]

I agree that this is vitally important AGM.

So vital that petty squabbles should become irreverent.

How about rather than looking for things the separate us, look for the things that link us i.e. The Rangers.

50k in the stadium ... 200k in Manchester, every of of us there for one reason & one reason only, the very reason we should all be at the AGM with one thought .... what's best for The Rangers.

Fuck, here's me thinkin it's what's best for mini. How could I make such a mistake?!!

[elephants stoned 2,994]

For once I almost welcome a boardroom thread

[Carsons Dog 9,878]

Glad you're surprised. RST members are consulted

So everyone who paid their £125 is consulted?

Is that a email consultation?

Letters with voting forms?

What happens if a majority oppose Mini?

[bawsburst 1,381]

An excellent appraisal by young McMurdo as usual.

http://billmcmurdo.wordpress.com/2013/09/22/falling-short-of-the-standard/

[Carson's cat 744]

So, according to McMurdo, we should only vote not to re-elect existing directors if it can be shown 'beyond reasonable doubt that they are not fit for purpose'. What a lot of bollocks. I thought elections were all about choosing the candidates we prefer. Nothing more; nothing less.

[Bad Robot 21,512]

So everyone who paid their £125 is consulted?

Is that a email consultation?

Letters with voting forms?

What happens if a majority oppose Mini?

It's not really mini they would be opposing, it's the investors.

[Ace 3,556]

So everyone who paid their £125 is consulted?

Is that a email consultation?

Letters with voting forms?

What happens if a majority oppose Mini?

Under rules set out, the RST must abide my a majority vote, whatever the result may be.

[bawsburst 1,381]

So, according to McMurdo, we should only vote not to re-elect existing directors if it can be shown 'beyond reasonable doubt that they are not fit for purpose'. What a lot of bollocks. I thought elections were all about choosing the candidates we prefer. Nothing more; nothing less.

Making stuff up again attributing opinions to others which have not been expressed, the usual MO of your sort and camp, the only bollox are in your head.

[Carson's cat 744]

Making stuff up again attributing opinions to others which have not been expressed, the usual MO of your sort and camp, the only bollox are in your head.

Are you for real? Just read McMurdo's blog - you know, the one you posted.

[bawsburst 1,381]

Are you for real? Just read McMurdo's blog - you know, the one you posted.

Yes the one that you invented and attributed a comment to, unfortunately you and your cohorts are all too real.

[DelightfulDennis 123]

The AGM can't come soon enough. We can only hope sufficient changes are made in the boardroom but many challenges lie ahead. Paul Murray being voted onto the board would certainly be a step in the right direction. One thing is for sure, the majority of Rangers supporters want change. We can no longer trust those in power.

• 
  

[Carsons Dog 9,878]

Under rules set out, the RST must abide my a majority vote, whatever the result may be.

That's refreshing to hear

[Carson's cat 744]

Yes the one that you invented and attributed a comment to, unfortunately you and your cohorts are all too real.

Yes, it must be a real nuisance to you that the club has 'real' fans like me, who are not taken in by your spin.

McMurdo stated quite clearly in his blog that we should all give the Board our backing until it can be shown beyond reasonable doubt that they are not fit for purpose. Do you agree or disagree that this is the test we should apply when we cast our vote at the AGM?