belter 1 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 Trying to get my facts straight ,if we had beaten kanus then alborg and qualified for he champions league how much different would things have been. 1. cuellar would probably not been sold or would he 2. we would have got 10 million cl money ? 3. would that money have been used to buy davis, mendes ect 4 would we be any better off in the playing sense 5 we may have been better off in the financial side depending how much money was invested.But would we be Felt these points needed debate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emerson 2 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 We didnt thats the reality. That is what is needed to be debated. Nothing gets sorted by arguing over 'what ifs....' If my uncle had balls....etc Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
belter 1 Posted January 16, 2009 Author Share Posted January 16, 2009 The point of the post is that possibly things would not have been a lot different if what i posted had been so. Therefore the loss of cl money is not one of the reasons we are in the situation we find ourselves in Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steakbake 403 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 We didnt thats the reality. That is what is needed to be debated. Nothing gets sorted by arguing over 'what ifs....' If my uncle had balls....etc Is it not if my auntie had balls she'd be my uncle? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emerson 2 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 We didnt thats the reality. That is what is needed to be debated. Nothing gets sorted by arguing over 'what ifs....' If my uncle had balls....etc Is it not if my auntie had balls she'd be my uncle? You havent met my uncle Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kplfishtank 4,656 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 We didnt thats the reality. That is what is needed to be debated. Nothing gets sorted by arguing over 'what ifs....' If my uncle had balls....etc Is it not if my auntie had balls she'd be my uncle? your auntie is your uncle you goin for a beer after game tmro? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steakbake 403 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 We didnt thats the reality. That is what is needed to be debated. Nothing gets sorted by arguing over 'what ifs....' If my uncle had balls....etc Is it not if my auntie had balls she'd be my uncle? You havent met my uncle Maybe just as well-hope it doesn't run in the family! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
outlaw69uk 123 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 Trying to get my facts straight ,if we had beaten kanus then alborg and qualified for he champions league how much different would things have been. 1. cuellar would probably not been sold or would he 2. we would have got 10 million cl money ? 3. would that money have been used to buy davis, mendes ect 4 would we be any better off in the playing sense 5 we may have been better off in the financial side depending how much money was invested.But would we be Felt these points needed debate All fine, but, add to that May not have signed Bougherra, Mendes, Davis, Edu (he will turn out to be a great signing imho), as most seem to think that Kaunus forced the purchase of these players Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steakbake 403 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 We didnt thats the reality. That is what is needed to be debated. Nothing gets sorted by arguing over 'what ifs....' If my uncle had balls....etc Is it not if my auntie had balls she'd be my uncle? your auntie is your uncle you goin for a beer after game tmro? Yes Den,before and after-usual arrangements. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfc_no1fan 13 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 Trying to get my facts straight ,if we had beaten kanus then alborg and qualified for he champions league how much different would things have been. 1. cuellar would probably not been sold or would he 2. we would have got 10 million cl money ? 3. would that money have been used to buy davis, mendes ect 4 would we be any better off in the playing sense 5 we may have been better off in the financial side depending how much money was invested.But would we be Felt these points needed debate All fine, but, add to that May not have signed Bougherra, Mendes, Davis, Edu (he will turn out to be a great signing imho), as most seem to think that Kaunus forced the purchase of these players Failure forced SDM to give Walter money to bring in quality (Davis, Mendes and Bougherra) However, if they had shown some ambition and signed quality before the Kaunas game (Which they should have done) we'd have signed some good players and been able to recoup all of the money spent in the Summer by participating in the Champions League. That is to simple for a club like Rangers. We are in the wrong hands and this is a prime example of why. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthernLights 2,526 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 I think we'd be in a pretty similar league position, but better financially. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cumbria_blue 51 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 We'd have been worse off in the league, as we'd have dropped more points after each CL game. We wouldn't have signed Mendes and Davis, as I believe that had we won SDM wouldn't have spent any money as he wouldnt think he needed to. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMWWBK 0 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 Trying to get my facts straight ,if we had beaten kanus then alborg and qualified for he champions league how much different would things have been. 1. cuellar would probably not been sold or would he 2. we would have got 10 million cl money ? 3. would that money have been used to buy davis, mendes ect 4 would we be any better off in the playing sense 5 we may have been better off in the financial side depending how much money was invested.But would we be Felt these points needed debate All fine, but, add to that May not have signed Bougherra, Mendes, Davis, Edu (he will turn out to be a great signing imho), as most seem to think that Kaunus forced the purchase of these players Failure forced SDM to give Walter money to bring in quality (Davis, Mendes and Bougherra) However, if they had shown some ambition and signed quality before the Kaunas game (Which they should have done) we'd have signed some good players and been able to recoup all of the money spent in the Summer by participating in the Champions League. That is to simple for a club like Rangers. We are in the wrong hands and this is a prime example of why. Murray sanctioned £7M worth of transfers though, it's just the buffoon that is Walter Smith chose to bring in 3 strikers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 Trying to get my facts straight ,if we had beaten kanus then alborg and qualified for he champions league how much different would things have been. 1. cuellar would probably not been sold or would he 2. we would have got 10 million cl money ? 3. would that money have been used to buy davis, mendes ect 4 would we be any better off in the playing sense 5 we may have been better off in the financial side depending how much money was invested.But would we be Felt these points needed debate All fine, but, add to that May not have signed Bougherra, Mendes, Davis, Edu (he will turn out to be a great signing imho), as most seem to think that Kaunus forced the purchase of these players Failure forced SDM to give Walter money to bring in quality (Davis, Mendes and Bougherra) However, if they had shown some ambition and signed quality before the Kaunas game (Which they should have done) we'd have signed some good players and been able to recoup all of the money spent in the Summer by participating in the Champions League. That is to simple for a club like Rangers. We are in the wrong hands and this is a prime example of why. Murray sanctioned £7M worth of transfers though, it's just the buffoon that is Walter Smith chose to bring in 3 strikers. That's a good point actually, and one that's often overlooked. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cumbria_blue 51 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 Trying to get my facts straight ,if we had beaten kanus then alborg and qualified for he champions league how much different would things have been. 1. cuellar would probably not been sold or would he 2. we would have got 10 million cl money ? 3. would that money have been used to buy davis, mendes ect 4 would we be any better off in the playing sense 5 we may have been better off in the financial side depending how much money was invested.But would we be Felt these points needed debate All fine, but, add to that May not have signed Bougherra, Mendes, Davis, Edu (he will turn out to be a great signing imho), as most seem to think that Kaunus forced the purchase of these players Failure forced SDM to give Walter money to bring in quality (Davis, Mendes and Bougherra) However, if they had shown some ambition and signed quality before the Kaunas game (Which they should have done) we'd have signed some good players and been able to recoup all of the money spent in the Summer by participating in the Champions League. That is to simple for a club like Rangers. We are in the wrong hands and this is a prime example of why. Murray sanctioned £7M worth of transfers though, it's just the buffoon that is Walter Smith chose to bring in 3 strikers. I'd say 2 strikers. I firmly believe that Walter originally intended to play Lafferty on the left wing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts