ray 105 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 All the handwringers that think we should bend over and self lube, two questions.1) What exactly are we to be punished for.2) If we take a chance and conclude that you managed to get the first question right, how do you justify putting forward your shithouse opinion that we should be punished for doing exactly fuck all. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rfc#1. 1,877 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 We're to be punished further for having the audacity to be the Most Successful Team in the World. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ray 105 Posted June 28, 2012 Author Share Posted June 28, 2012 We're to be punished further for having the audacity to be the Most Successful Team in the World.You get rewarded for success, the hand wringers think we should accept anything these sfa/spl kunts decide to hit us with, can the hand wringers tell us why. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 which previously banned member are you?right now i am guessing you are gunslinger, but you are 100% a previous banned member. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Who actualy thinks we should be punished more than the draconian and occasionly illegal punishments we've already had? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 which previously banned member are you?right now i am guessing you are gunslinger, but you are 100% a previous banned member.Hes Spangles, Gunslinger and Ray used to have some right old arguments, unless that was to throw us of track, hmmmmmm Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmyblue75 20 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 which previously banned member are you?right now i am guessing you are gunslinger, but you are 100% a previous banned member.Was gunslinger hooked? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Was gunslinger hooked?yeah a couple of months ago i thinkmaybe sometime around the 12th of april lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVB 2,560 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 All the handwringers that think we should bend over and self lube, two questions.1) What exactly are we to be punished for.2) If we take a chance and conclude that you managed to get the first question right, how do you justify putting forward your shithouse opinion that we should be punished for doing exactly fuck all.1) Dodgy food from the catering outlets2) We should have to change our pie people. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmarriedAfineYin 5 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 reeking in here Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.T.G 10,773 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Ray aint GunslingerGunslinger was a cockRay's a fannyNot the same Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.T.G 10,773 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Was gunslinger hooked?Seriously?????It was an ambush mate, two letters flying everywhere, keyboards roastinWas quite a timeOooooh the banter Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ray 105 Posted June 28, 2012 Author Share Posted June 28, 2012 Who actualy thinks we should be punished more than the draconian and occasionly illegal punishments we've already had?FFS this is hard work, why the fuck should we be punished we haven't done fuck all !!Fuckin moonbeams whit next warchests ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwhiteandblue 3,330 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Seriously?????It was an ambush mate, two letters flying everywhere, keyboards roastinWas quite a timeOooooh the banterwhat actually happened? I missed it.I think North Rd is gunslinger. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 FFS this is hard work, why the fuck should we be punished we haven't done fuck all !!Fuckin moonbeams whit next warchests ? Thats what im saying, im also asking who thinks we should be punished more? I havnt seen or heard anyone who thinks that amongst our supporters. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
californiadreamin52 339 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 What we have been saying for months has proven to be true unfortunately it has just got throught to the games legislators. Now we have an economic weapon which we should us advisory, We should not give away anything more than we have to no blank sheets of paper to continually penalise us or give up our right to legal recourse. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.T.G 10,773 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 what actually happened? I missed it.I think North Rd is gunslinger.He made a dodgy comment about Clydebank bombings and got choppedNorthRd aint GunslingerJust look for the one word answers and the love of TBK, then you shall find what you seek Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloorichtthru 24 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 fannysI love TBKshit i've blown my cover Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwhiteandblue 3,330 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 He made a dodgy comment about Clydebank bombings and got choppedNorthRd aint GunslingerJust look for the one word answers and the love of TBK, then you shall find what you seekwho was the comment to?Anychance of a PM what the comment was? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
T_Cradle85 3 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 1) What exactly are we to be punished for.2) If we take a chance and conclude that you managed to get the first question right, how do you justify putting forward your shithouse opinion that we should be punished for doing exactly fuck all.1) The 'punishments' being discussed about the entry of the NewCo in to the SPL (and/or SFL1 etc) are nothing to do with the previous club/company (delete as approproiate to your own belief). It is to do with the fact that a new company, with a new club name are applying for a footballing license and admission in to the top tier(s) of the Scottish game. ANY other NewCo would be expected to start at the very bottom and work their way back in. Clearly the situation we find ourselves in is a bit different than most. Firstly being of the sheer size of the club in comparison to the rest of the clubs in the Scottish game (Celtic excluded), and secondly because of this size of club the financial implications it has.So to answer the first questions shortly, we are being 'punished' for jumping 3 leagues. They will be deciding on the stipulations on our entry in to SPL, as opposed to take the more tradtional method of working up the leagues. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.T.G 10,773 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 who was the comment to?Anychance of a PM what the comment was?Can't remember mate, wasn't much tbhJust google 'gunslinger banned rangers media'Should come up Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ray 105 Posted June 28, 2012 Author Share Posted June 28, 2012 1) The 'punishments' being discussed about the entry of the NewCo in to the SPL (and/or SFL1 etc) are nothing to do with the previous club/company (delete as approproiate to your own belief). It is to do with the fact that a new company, with a new club name are applying for a footballing license and admission in to the top tier(s) of the Scottish game. ANY other NewCo would be expected to start at the very bottom and work their way back in. Clearly the situation we find ourselves in is a bit different than most. Firstly being of the sheer size of the club in comparison to the rest of the clubs in the Scottish game (Celtic excluded), and secondly because of this size of club the financial implications it has.So to answer the first questions shortly, we are being 'punished' for jumping 3 leagues. They will be deciding on the stipulations on our entry in to SPL, as opposed to take the more tradtional method of working up the leagues.Application for entry is a straight yes or no vote there is no punishment ascribed for making an application, we have had 10 points deducted for administration, have another go. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
T_Cradle85 3 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Application for entry is a straight yes or no vote there is no punishment ascribed for making an application, we have had 10 points deducted for administration, have another go. Step back and think for a moment.The 10[pts was for OldCo going in to administration., Now forget about that, it's in the past.NewCo is applying for a spot in the SPL, without going through the traditional mehtod of climbing the leagues. SPL are set to vote yes/no on this - they can however put stipulations (punishments if you will) on this in regards to the fact that NewCo haven't went the traditional way of winning their place to the SPL.Why so many of our fellow support fail to understand that the potential 'punishments' are for jumping the leagues is beyond me.Don't get me wrong, we know there will be underling motives in these things, but it will be caked up for jumping the leagues.Geez, me and you right now could get together and put a team in place and apply for the 12th share if we wanted. And the same 'punishments' will be given to us. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ray 105 Posted June 28, 2012 Author Share Posted June 28, 2012 Step back and think for a moment.The 10[pts was for OldCo going in to administration., Now forget about that, it's in the past.NewCo is applying for a spot in the SPL, without going through the traditional mehtod of climbing the leagues. SPL are set to vote yes/no on this - they can however put stipulations (punishments if you will) on this in regards to the fact that NewCo haven't went the traditional way of winning their place to the SPL.Why so many of our fellow support fail to understand that the potential 'punishments' are for jumping the leagues is beyond me.Don't get me wrong, we know there will be underling motives in these things, but it will be caked up for jumping the leagues.Geez, me and you right now could get together and put a team in place and apply for the 12th share if we wanted. And the same 'punishments' will be given to us.We aren't jumping anything we were applying for a perfectly legal share transfer as confirmed by Doncaster.Have another go. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
T_Cradle85 3 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 We aren't jumping anything we were applying for a perfectly legal share transfer as confirmed by Doncaster.Have another go. Division 3 - jumpedDivision 2 - jumpedDivision 1 - jumpedWe won't play in ANY of those leagues as NewCo.Applying for the share is perfectly legal, any club can apply for it if they really wanted. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.