Jump to content

stfu

First Team
  • Content Count

    729
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About stfu

  • Rank
    First Team

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    UK

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. stfu

    Paul McStay

    This is nonsense never happened. He was roundly ridiculed for throwing his top into the jungle at the last home game of the season because as usual the yahoo media had him going to all these big clubs. And guess what he never went anywhere because he was another over rated joke. I just surprised he didn't win young player of the year this year. He did however give me one moment of great joy when he bottled it from taking a penalty in the Raith Rovers final at Ibrox and then missed when he was forced to. 🤣
  2. LMAO the madness on here is hilarious. So BlueMe and King Jela thinks that we spent the same money with Warburton in total than we made on Windass. Forget Senderos and Joey Barton. We covered the budget. FFS.
  3. So the last one from pedo FC currently to face criminal charges is the only one to put forward a guilty plea. I cannot think of any reason why that might be suspicious in any way. All questions to be sent to the newly formed Catholics United Not Telling Sexual Story's.
  4. What worries me is why did they think that the likes of Lafferty was good enough anyway.
  5. I remember in 1986 when Uruguay beat Scotland in the world cup with a team of hammer throwers. Look at how the players and the football of that country has progressed since then and compare it to Scotland. Until all clubs in this country agree to try and play decent technical football we have no chance. My oldest used to play every weekend for a boys club and some of the attitudes from the coaches and parents of the clubs is like something out of the 70's. Screaming and swearing at young boys to fecking smash him and stuff is frankly embarrassing in this day, but that's Scottish football for you. If we fix it we need need to get every club to agree no more hammer throwers.
  6. Yet another job for the boys. I wonder how much we are wasting on him this time. Its about time we started looking at things with a modern view not scouting like it's 1980.
  7. The apology should have come after the 2nd or 3rd stupid red not the fifth. He is a liability that also forces our team to play in a certain way which has no back up plan. We need to start playing and acting like a team not 10 guys and Morelos, if we are so reliant on him that we cannot adapt and beat teams without him then we have to move him on while he is still worth something. The whole team need to start apologising because some of their performances have been shocking. Worrall yesterday had a nightmare and that's not the first time he has let us down. I am fed up hearing pish from our Manager like i was too angry to talk to them or I know who didnt step up and do a job. How many times does Worrall or Jack or Morelos need to play badly before they are dropped. If we have no strength in depth in our squad then that is down to one man only, and lets be honest apart from McGregor, Kamara and Kent i have not seen much from any of his other signings and there have been quite a few. Apart from Europe we have a worse record with Gerard than we did with Pedro. And even the magic hat managed to beat the yahoos even if it was on penalties. When the chancer Warburton left we were in 2nd place in the league so no great improvement there. I really want Gerard to succeed but we should never have let a rookie Manager learn his job at our club. The minute we put pressure on the beggars they went out and paid a lot of money to bring Rogers in, we however went fro an under 21 coach to an under 18 coach and expected miracles.
  8. Its funny how i got a virtually word for word response from a different MP from the same party.
  9. I got a very similar reply mate from my MP which makes me think that they have already decided how they are going to let them away with this. My reply goes on about the SFA as if they are part of the judiciary.
  10. Part of our problems over the last 20 years is we don't rate our own players highly enough, it has become almost trendy to slag our own and under value them. On the other hand the yahoos over the years are picking up money for utter dross like Gary Hooper and Craig Beattie who between them brought in more than six million. Now I am not a huge Tav fan but if you take into account the number of assists that he has had even before you count his goals then we should be holding out for a lot more than £2M. Thankfully I think we are now starting to put a true value on our players.
  11. Fact, Rangers hit with five SFA charges following their criticism of referee Willie Collum. Fact no other team has been charged by SFA for criticising referees. Here are the charges in full. Notice of Complaint | Rangers FC Wednesday 28 November 2018 Alleged Party in Breach: Rangers FC Date: Between 8 and 16 November 2018 Disciplinary Rules allegedly breached: Charge 1: No recognised football body, club, official, Team Official or other member of Team Staff, player or other person under the jurisdiction of the Scottish FA, shall in an interview, a ‘blog’ on the internet, on a social networking or microblogging site, or in any other manner calculated or likely to lead to publicity (i) criticise the Decision(s) and/or performance(s) of any or all match official(s) in such a way as to indicate bias or incompetence on the part of such match official; or (ii) make remarks about such match official(s) which impinge on his character. For the avoidance of doubt this Rule applies (i) whether reported to the Scottish FA by a match official for Misconduct or otherwise, and (ii) where remarks are brought to the Scottish FA’s attention, or of which the Scottish FA becomes aware, by whatever manner or means. There shall be a presumption that any material published in such manner was published in the name of and/or with the authority of the person or body bearing to have published the material. Or alternatively: A club or recognised football body which publishes, distributes, issues, sells or authorises a third party to publish, distribute, issue or sell a match programme or any other publication or audio/visual material of any description in any media now existing or hereinafter invented, including but not limited to the Internet, social networking or micro-blogging sites, shall ensure that any such publications or audio/visual material does not contain any criticism of any match official calculated to indicate bias or incompetence on the part of such match official or to impinge upon his character. There shall be a presumption that any material issued, published, distributed and/or sold in such manner was issued, published, distributed and/ or sold in the name of and/or with the authority of the body bearing to have issued, published, distributed and/or sold the material. Charge 2: No recognised football body, club, official, Team Official or other member of Team Staff, player, match official, or other person under the jurisdiction of the Scottish FA shall bring the game into disrepute. Charge 3: A recognised football body, club, official, Team Official, other member of Team Staff, player, match official or other person under the jurisdiction of the Scottish FA shall, at all times, act in the best interests of Association Football. Furthermore such person or body shall not act in any manner which is improper or use any one, or a combination of, violent Conduct, serious foul play, threatening, abusive, indecent or insulting words or behaviour. Charge 4: All members shall: (a) observe the principles of loyalty, integrity and sportsmanship in accordance with the rules of fair play; (b) be subject to and shall comply with: (i) the Articles; (ii) this Protocol; (iii) the Cup Competition Rules; (iv) the Registration Procedures; (v) the International Match Calendar; (vi) Club Licensing Procedures; and (vii) any statutes, regulations, directives, codes, Decisions promulgated by the Board, the Professional Game Board, the Non-Professional Game Board, the Judicial Panel, a Committee or sub-committee, FIFA, UEFA or the Court of Arbitration for Sport; (c) recognise and submit to the jurisdiction of the Court of Arbitration for Sport as specified in the relevant provisions of the FIFA Statutes and the UEFA Statutes; (d) respect the Laws of the Game; (e) refrain from engaging in any activity, practice or conduct which would constitute an offence under sections 1, 2 or 6 of the Bribery Act 2010; (f) behave towards the Scottish FA and other members with the utmost good faith. Charge 5: Each member shall procure that its officials, its Team Officials and its players act in accordance with Rule 1. Or alternatively: Each member shall use its best endeavours to procure that its Team Staff its employees and its Team Scout(s) (other than its officials, Team Officials or players) act in accordance with Rule 1. Or alternatively: All Parties must keep confidential any information or documentation relating to Proceedings arising under this Protocol which is not in the public domain (including but not limited to the identities of the Panel Members), save where disclosure is allowed under the Protocol and/or required by law. Principal hearing date: Wednesday 19 December 2018 Response date: Tuesday 4 December 2018
  12. But surely treating Rangers differently to other clubs proves "anti Rangers positioning "?
  13. Lafferty struggles to hold up the ball. We tried to get him to do it two games in a row and in both games he couldn't do it. I didn't think he was good enough for us the first time and I stand by that.
×
×
  • Create New...