thehost

Now we have the latest stitch up of Scottish football.
Now we have a CEO talking about being humble.
Now we have a club seemingly intent on having the biggest squad with little to no reference being made to financial control.
Now we have a chairman who seems determined to never open his mouth.
Now we have a board for Scottish football that excludes the country's biggest club (yes fury we ain't on it)
Are you now publically going to:
Ask about our TV revenue, upon which most of this charade is based.
Ask about the treatment of Hearts and when they are going to be subject to the same rules as ourselves?
Ask why Dunfermline haven't been subject to the same punishments that we faced?
Or do we only do press releases when it suits the political ambitions of a few folk?
You got your board of Rangers men, I hope you are happy with what you helped create.

Ok Christopher.
Explain the need for the SPL to force through reconstruction so quickly, explain what benefits SFL1 clubs minus Rangers would bring to the table moving forward. Rangers were involved im discussions re SPL2. That is fact. This wasn't made public because of the adverse reaction from all sides, however it was on the cards. Now, you being Mr Rangers with your microchip link to the Blue room can deny this all you want to be honest I would expect nothing less, bar the odd condescending remark. That said, if you read what I said it was the uncertainty and rumours that forced the SFL clubs hands. Mr Longmuir and Mr Ballantyne held all the aces when Charles Green was in charge, as Rangers were going to back them to the hilt. This changed when "Real Rangers Men" staged their coup, of course you would know all this being Mr Rangers eh.
"Real Rangers Men" is indeed used as a slur by myself, simply because it is the moronic pedestal ex Managers and players are placed upon. We have the worst manager in our history leading us into Admin #2 after time, protected by his guardian Walter who will protect his protege at all costs despite the fact he can't coach players or improve them. His chequebook management style was a major factor in our money problems under Murray, of course this wasn't his fault as who would turn down money to make their job easier. Walter though should have learnt from this for his tenure on the board, though he hasn't as he is like an Absent father with his son in a candy store lavishing whatever is asked on him. Given your budding Businessman aspirations, surely you understand that a business fresh from Adnin/Liquidation needs to seriously alter their methods to build the business back up. It was Green and his men that toured the world working extortiante hours to get us new sponsors, new kit suppliers, £22m investment during the worst economic downturn any of us have known. He was forced out by those he offered the hand of friendship to simply because he wasn't prepared to stand by and let the worst manager in out history have whatever he wanted at all costs.
Yiu claim that those who speak out against you and your ilk for having an agenda are indeed those with an agenda. True, I know my personal agenda is to see our club financially stable and parasites within our support ostracised so we can unite and take our enemies head on. This won't be the case as long as money or blazers can be sought.
I don't need Bill McMurdo to tell me anything, I will simply praise the fact that he didn't let self interests dictate his blogs.
D'artgnan is far and away the most talented writer in the Rangers family and its an absolute godsend he never toed no party line.
I welcome your condescending reply professing to know better than I and all others, but remember Christopher you are nothing more than a wee nobody like us all that happened to have a tweet acknowledged by STV. You know nothing but the party line told onto you

How about this Christopher. The financial carrots to SFL1 clubs to jump ship for an SPL2 only held water if Rangers were to join an SPL2 set up also. There are no 2 ways about it, Div 1 clubs can threaten all they like but they could have done nothing without us. The morally and fiscally insolvent SPL needed the SFL for our inclusion in TV games, hence the need to "reconstruct" or in laymans terns takeover.
If our mute Chairman or any other spokesperson spoke out and stated clearly that we would not join any SPL2 nor indeed SPL1 then smaller SFL clubs that welcomed us with open arms would not have been bullied into accepting the takeover. Instead, "Real Rangers Men" are "humble" to accept full membership and be able to play trialists in the first 4 games. McCoist will have lost his ready made excuse of losing the first 4 games, but heyho. Our silence ensured clubs were bullied into accepting this farce, if Charles Green and his team (who actually stood up to the plate when it mattered and saved us) were not forced out by "Real Rangers Men" who put nothing into the club then we would have stood alongside the SFL clubs with Longmuir and Ballentyne. Once Green was forced out, so too was our integrity in standing alongside our friends. Dignified silence on the Gravy Train ride, but heyho the big bad businessmen are away so all is well. Our club doesn't need Gravytrain passengers with jobs for the boys, it will see us enter Administration #2. We need businessmen that realise for them to make money we need to be successful and protect the brand by fighting our detractors, not getting into bed so we can be their bitches for the forseeable.
Given Fans groups and the majority of bloggers were working to the Gravytrain agenda, little wonder the future is so bleak. Bill McMurdo is the only frequent blogger to have any dignity left, of course alongside the fabulous D'artagnan who has only Rangers interests at heart.
Hell mend those with an agenda Christopher, any wonder the club is nothing but a limp wristed shadow of itself

Now we have the latest stitch up of Scottish football.
Now we have a CEO talking about being humble.
Now we have a club seemingly intent on having the biggest squad with little to no reference being made to financial control.
Now we have a chairman who seems determined to never open his mouth.
Now we have a board for Scottish football that excludes the country's biggest club (yes fury we ain't on it)
Are you now publically going to:
Ask about our TV revenue, upon which most of this charade is based.
Ask about the treatment of Hearts and when they are going to be subject to the same rules as ourselves?
Ask why Dunfermline haven't been subject to the same punishments that we faced?
Or do we only do press releases when it suits the political ambitions of a few folk?
You got your board of Rangers men, I hope you are happy with what you helped create.

Now we have the latest stitch up of Scottish football.
Now we have a CEO talking about being humble.
Now we have a club seemingly intent on having the biggest squad with little to no reference being made to financial control.
Now we have a chairman who seems determined to never open his mouth.
Now we have a board for Scottish football that excludes the country's biggest club (yes fury we ain't on it)
Are you now publically going to:
Ask about our TV revenue, upon which most of this charade is based.
Ask about the treatment of Hearts and when they are going to be subject to the same rules as ourselves?
Ask why Dunfermline haven't been subject to the same punishments that we faced?
Or do we only do press releases when it suits the political ambitions of a few folk?
You got your board of Rangers men, I hope you are happy with what you helped create.

Now we have the latest stitch up of Scottish football.
Now we have a CEO talking about being humble.
Now we have a club seemingly intent on having the biggest squad with little to no reference being made to financial control.
Now we have a chairman who seems determined to never open his mouth.
Now we have a board for Scottish football that excludes the country's biggest club (yes fury we ain't on it)
Are you now publically going to:
Ask about our TV revenue, upon which most of this charade is based.
Ask about the treatment of Hearts and when they are going to be subject to the same rules as ourselves?
Ask why Dunfermline haven't been subject to the same punishments that we faced?
Or do we only do press releases when it suits the political ambitions of a few folk?
You got your board of Rangers men, I hope you are happy with what you helped create.

Now we have the latest stitch up of Scottish football.
Now we have a CEO talking about being humble.
Now we have a club seemingly intent on having the biggest squad with little to no reference being made to financial control.
Now we have a chairman who seems determined to never open his mouth.
Now we have a board for Scottish football that excludes the country's biggest club (yes fury we ain't on it)
Are you now publically going to:
Ask about our TV revenue, upon which most of this charade is based.
Ask about the treatment of Hearts and when they are going to be subject to the same rules as ourselves?
Ask why Dunfermline haven't been subject to the same punishments that we faced?
Or do we only do press releases when it suits the political ambitions of a few folk?
You got your board of Rangers men, I hope you are happy with what you helped create.

Now we have the latest stitch up of Scottish football.
Now we have a CEO talking about being humble.
Now we have a club seemingly intent on having the biggest squad with little to no reference being made to financial control.
Now we have a chairman who seems determined to never open his mouth.
Now we have a board for Scottish football that excludes the country's biggest club (yes fury we ain't on it)
Are you now publically going to:
Ask about our TV revenue, upon which most of this charade is based.
Ask about the treatment of Hearts and when they are going to be subject to the same rules as ourselves?
Ask why Dunfermline haven't been subject to the same punishments that we faced?
Or do we only do press releases when it suits the political ambitions of a few folk?
You got your board of Rangers men, I hope you are happy with what you helped create.

The Problem is D'art that the media are allowed to present them as some form of spokespeople of the fans. Hence a few folk organising 3 bodies to make statements on the day of the board meeting.
I'm not so sure that people understand that those statements represented the views of a HANDFUL of individuals and not the membership of each grouping. Add to that the "on-side" bloggers and suddenly we have the walter and ally show.
Meanwhile the club is heading for the grubber.

Now we have the latest stitch up of Scottish football.
Now we have a CEO talking about being humble.
Now we have a club seemingly intent on having the biggest squad with little to no reference being made to financial control.
Now we have a chairman who seems determined to never open his mouth.
Now we have a board for Scottish football that excludes the country's biggest club (yes fury we ain't on it)
Are you now publically going to:
Ask about our TV revenue, upon which most of this charade is based.
Ask about the treatment of Hearts and when they are going to be subject to the same rules as ourselves?
Ask why Dunfermline haven't been subject to the same punishments that we faced?
Or do we only do press releases when it suits the political ambitions of a few folk?
You got your board of Rangers men, I hope you are happy with what you helped create.

Now we have the latest stitch up of Scottish football.
Now we have a CEO talking about being humble.
Now we have a club seemingly intent on having the biggest squad with little to no reference being made to financial control.
Now we have a chairman who seems determined to never open his mouth.
Now we have a board for Scottish football that excludes the country's biggest club (yes fury we ain't on it)
Are you now publically going to:
Ask about our TV revenue, upon which most of this charade is based.
Ask about the treatment of Hearts and when they are going to be subject to the same rules as ourselves?
Ask why Dunfermline haven't been subject to the same punishments that we faced?
Or do we only do press releases when it suits the political ambitions of a few folk?
You got your board of Rangers men, I hope you are happy with what you helped create.

Feel free to laugh away as we follow the same tried and trusted business plan that made the brand toxic.
I'd also advise you to have a wee google search for The Gub and espanyolification as that as where we are heading, steered there by "rangers men".

Now we have the latest stitch up of Scottish football.
Now we have a CEO talking about being humble.
Now we have a club seemingly intent on having the biggest squad with little to no reference being made to financial control.
Now we have a chairman who seems determined to never open his mouth.
Now we have a board for Scottish football that excludes the country's biggest club (yes fury we ain't on it)
Are you now publically going to:
Ask about our TV revenue, upon which most of this charade is based.
Ask about the treatment of Hearts and when they are going to be subject to the same rules as ourselves?
Ask why Dunfermline haven't been subject to the same punishments that we faced?
Or do we only do press releases when it suits the political ambitions of a few folk?
You got your board of Rangers men, I hope you are happy with what you helped create.

Now we have the latest stitch up of Scottish football.
Now we have a CEO talking about being humble.
Now we have a club seemingly intent on having the biggest squad with little to no reference being made to financial control.
Now we have a chairman who seems determined to never open his mouth.
Now we have a board for Scottish football that excludes the country's biggest club (yes fury we ain't on it)
Are you now publically going to:
Ask about our TV revenue, upon which most of this charade is based.
Ask about the treatment of Hearts and when they are going to be subject to the same rules as ourselves?
Ask why Dunfermline haven't been subject to the same punishments that we faced?
Or do we only do press releases when it suits the political ambitions of a few folk?
You got your board of Rangers men, I hope you are happy with what you helped create.

so he should tell the press exactly what he told the player ......seriously...
Anyway great news that we have our leader back in a prime position with the club.

The problem is that he represents everything that is bad about RFC
Lover of minty Check
Dignified silence. Check
Refusal to defend the club Check
Refusal to defend the fans. Check
Wine and dine with those who seek our destruction. Check
He has already stuck his nose into the managers roll when he had no right to do so.
In short he is the last person we should be wanting to be involved in any club business other than giving him a free couple of seats for past contributions.

FFS!!!!
Dignified silence, jobs for the boys, daily rebel in the know, bbc welcomed, radio snyde welcomed and an sfa love-in. Hope I'm wrong.